mirror of https://github.com/apache/lucene.git
SOLR-7603: more detail in asserts, and more asserts on the initial chain (before looking at the distributed version) to try and figure out WTF is going on here
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk@1682564 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
parent
f35ca87130
commit
9cf98e784e
|
@ -20,22 +20,36 @@ package org.apache.solr.update.processor;
|
|||
import static org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributingUpdateProcessorFactory.DISTRIB_UPDATE_PARAM;
|
||||
|
||||
import java.util.Arrays;
|
||||
import java.util.ArrayList;
|
||||
import java.util.List;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore;
|
||||
import org.apache.solr.response.SolrQueryResponse;
|
||||
import org.apache.solr.util.AbstractSolrTestCase;
|
||||
import org.junit.AfterClass;
|
||||
import org.junit.BeforeClass;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public class UpdateRequestProcessorFactoryTest extends AbstractSolrTestCase {
|
||||
|
||||
private static org.apache.log4j.Level SAVED_LEVEL = null; // SOLR-7603
|
||||
|
||||
@BeforeClass
|
||||
public static void beforeClass() throws Exception {
|
||||
|
||||
// SOLR-7603
|
||||
SAVED_LEVEL = org.apache.log4j.LogManager.getRootLogger().getLevel();
|
||||
org.apache.log4j.LogManager.getRootLogger().setLevel(org.apache.log4j.Level.DEBUG);
|
||||
|
||||
initCore("solrconfig-transformers.xml", "schema.xml");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@AfterClass
|
||||
public static void fixLogLevelAfterClass() throws Exception { // SOLR-7603
|
||||
org.apache.log4j.LogManager.getRootLogger().setLevel(SAVED_LEVEL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testConfiguration() throws Exception
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -78,60 +92,76 @@ public class UpdateRequestProcessorFactoryTest extends AbstractSolrTestCase {
|
|||
"distrib-chain-noop")) {
|
||||
|
||||
UpdateRequestProcessor proc;
|
||||
List<UpdateRequestProcessor> procs;
|
||||
|
||||
UpdateRequestProcessorChain chain = core.getUpdateProcessingChain(name);
|
||||
assertNotNull(name, chain);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// either explicitly, or because of injection
|
||||
assertEquals(name + " chain length", EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH,
|
||||
assertEquals(name + " chain length: " + chain.toString(), EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH,
|
||||
chain.getFactories().length);
|
||||
|
||||
// Custom comes first in all three of our chains
|
||||
// test a basic (non distrib) chain
|
||||
proc = chain.createProcessor(req(), new SolrQueryResponse());
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " first processor isn't a CustomUpdateRequestProcessor: "
|
||||
+ proc.getClass().getName(),
|
||||
proc instanceof CustomUpdateRequestProcessor);
|
||||
procs = procToList(proc);
|
||||
assertEquals(name + " procs size: " + procs.toString(),
|
||||
// -1 = NoOpDistributingUpdateProcessorFactory produces no processor
|
||||
EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH - ("distrib-chain-noop".equals(name) ? 1 : 0),
|
||||
procs.size());
|
||||
|
||||
// Custom comes first in all three of our chains
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " first processor isn't a CustomUpdateRequestProcessor: " + procs.toString(),
|
||||
( // compare them both just because i'm going insane and the more checks the better
|
||||
proc instanceof CustomUpdateRequestProcessor
|
||||
&& procs.get(0) instanceof CustomUpdateRequestProcessor));
|
||||
|
||||
// varies depending on chain, but definitely shouldn't be Custom
|
||||
// Log should always come second in our chain.
|
||||
assertNotNull(name + " proc.next is null", proc.next);
|
||||
assertNotNull(name + " second proc is null", procs.get(1));
|
||||
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " second proc isn't LogUpdateProcessor: " + procs.toString(),
|
||||
( // compare them both just because i'm going insane and the more checks the better
|
||||
proc.next instanceof LogUpdateProcessor
|
||||
&& procs.get(1) instanceof LogUpdateProcessor));
|
||||
|
||||
// fetch the distributed version of this chain
|
||||
proc = chain.createProcessor(req(DISTRIB_UPDATE_PARAM, "non_blank_value"),
|
||||
new SolrQueryResponse());
|
||||
procs = procToList(proc);
|
||||
assertNotNull(name + " (distrib) chain produced null proc", proc);
|
||||
assertFalse(name + " (distrib) procs is empty", procs.isEmpty());
|
||||
|
||||
assertNotNull(name + " distrib chain had no proc's in it",
|
||||
proc);
|
||||
assertFalse(name + " post distrib proc should not be a CustomUpdateRequestProcessor: "
|
||||
+ proc.getClass().getName(),
|
||||
proc instanceof CustomUpdateRequestProcessor);
|
||||
// for these 3 (distrib) chains, the first proc should always be LogUpdateProcessor
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " (distrib) first proc should be LogUpdateProcessor because of @RunAllways: "
|
||||
+ procs.toString(),
|
||||
( // compare them both just because i'm going insane and the more checks the better
|
||||
proc instanceof LogUpdateProcessor
|
||||
&& procs.get(0) instanceof LogUpdateProcessor));
|
||||
|
||||
int n=0;
|
||||
boolean foundLog = false;
|
||||
String seen = "";
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
n++;
|
||||
seen = seen + proc.toString() + ", ";
|
||||
if (proc instanceof LogUpdateProcessor) {
|
||||
foundLog = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (null == proc.next) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
proc = proc.next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
// for these 3 (distrib) chains, the last proc should always be RunUpdateProcessor
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " (distrib) last processor isn't a RunUpdateProcessor: " + procs.toString(),
|
||||
procs.get(procs.size()-1) instanceof RunUpdateProcessor );
|
||||
|
||||
// some processors should have been dropped
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " expected a distrib chain shorter then " + EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH + " but got: " + n
|
||||
+ " (" + seen +")",
|
||||
n < EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH );
|
||||
// make sure the marker interface was successful in keeping the log processor even though it comes
|
||||
// before distrib
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " expected LogUpdateProcessor in chain due to @RunAllways, but not found: " + seen,
|
||||
foundLog );
|
||||
|
||||
// all of these (shortened) distrib chains should still end with RunUpdateprocessor
|
||||
assertTrue(name + " last processor isn't a RunUpdateProcessor: " + proc.getClass().getName(),
|
||||
proc instanceof RunUpdateProcessor);
|
||||
// either 1 proc was droped in distrib mode, or 1 for the "implicit" chain
|
||||
assertEquals(name + " (distrib) chain has wrong length: " + procs.toString(),
|
||||
// -1 = all chains lose CustomUpdateRequestProcessorFactory
|
||||
// -1 = distrib-chain-noop: NoOpDistributingUpdateProcessorFactory produces no processor
|
||||
// -1 = distrib-chain-implicit: does RemoveBlank before distrib
|
||||
EXPECTED_CHAIN_LENGTH - ( "distrib-chain-explicit".equals(name) ? 1 : 2),
|
||||
procs.size());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* walks the "next" values of the proc building up a List of the procs for easier testing
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public static List<UpdateRequestProcessor> procToList(UpdateRequestProcessor proc) {
|
||||
List<UpdateRequestProcessor> result = new ArrayList<UpdateRequestProcessor>(7);
|
||||
while (null != proc) {
|
||||
result.add(proc);
|
||||
proc = proc.next;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue