From b8dfb7e911e68dd89741675c70e0f7b6745b4502 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nhat Nguyen Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2018 11:13:42 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] LUCENE-8472: Always rewrite soft-deletes retention query This change ensures that we always rewrite the soft-deletes merge retention policy before passing it into `createWeight` as some Query does not support `createWeight` directly. --- lucene/CHANGES.txt | 2 ++ .../SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java | 2 +- .../TestSoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lucene/CHANGES.txt b/lucene/CHANGES.txt index 5120f2808f3..a2d88cd48ef 100644 --- a/lucene/CHANGES.txt +++ b/lucene/CHANGES.txt @@ -312,6 +312,8 @@ Bug Fixes: * LUCENE-8384: Fix missing advance docValues generation while handling docValues update in PendingSoftDeletes. (Simon Willnauer, Nhat Nguyen) + * LUCENE-8472: Always rewrite the soft-deletes merge retention query. (Adrien Grand, Nhat Nguyen) + ======================= Lucene 7.4.0 ======================= Upgrading diff --git a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java index a309b7a8bb2..9097a037368 100644 --- a/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java +++ b/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ public final class SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy extends OneMergeWrappingMerge private static Scorer getScorer(Query query, CodecReader reader) throws IOException { IndexSearcher s = new IndexSearcher(reader); s.setQueryCache(null); - Weight weight = s.createWeight(query, ScoreMode.COMPLETE_NO_SCORES, 1.0f); + Weight weight = s.createWeight(s.rewrite(query), ScoreMode.COMPLETE_NO_SCORES, 1.0f); return weight.scorer(reader.getContext()); } diff --git a/lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestSoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java b/lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestSoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java index bc50fe52d98..fed2d195634 100644 --- a/lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestSoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java +++ b/lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/index/TestSoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy.java @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ import org.apache.lucene.search.DocValuesFieldExistsQuery; import org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher; import org.apache.lucene.search.MatchAllDocsQuery; import org.apache.lucene.search.MatchNoDocsQuery; +import org.apache.lucene.search.PrefixQuery; import org.apache.lucene.search.Query; import org.apache.lucene.search.SearcherFactory; import org.apache.lucene.search.SearcherManager; @@ -678,6 +679,32 @@ public class TestSoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy extends LuceneTestCase { IOUtils.close(writer, dir); } + public void testRewriteRetentionQuery() throws Exception { + Directory dir = newDirectory(); + IndexWriterConfig config = newIndexWriterConfig().setSoftDeletesField("soft_deletes") + .setMergePolicy(new SoftDeletesRetentionMergePolicy("soft_deletes", + () -> new PrefixQuery(new Term("id", "foo")), newMergePolicy())); + IndexWriter writer = new IndexWriter(dir, config); + + Document d = new Document(); + d.add(new StringField("id", "foo-1", Field.Store.YES)); + writer.addDocument(d); + d = new Document(); + d.add(new StringField("id", "foo-2", Field.Store.YES)); + writer.softUpdateDocument(new Term("id", "foo-1"), d, new NumericDocValuesField("soft_deletes", 1)); + + d = new Document(); + d.add(new StringField("id", "bar-1", Field.Store.YES)); + writer.addDocument(d); + d.add(new StringField("id", "bar-2", Field.Store.YES)); + writer.softUpdateDocument(new Term("id", "bar-1"), d, new NumericDocValuesField("soft_deletes", 1)); + + writer.forceMerge(1); + assertEquals(2, writer.numDocs()); // foo-2, bar-2 + assertEquals(3, writer.maxDoc()); // foo-1, foo-2, bar-2 + IOUtils.close(writer, dir); + } + static void doUpdate(Term doc, IndexWriter writer, Field... fields) throws IOException { long seqId = -1; do { // retry if we just committing a merge