From c84752afb953dbee89b3049b2cae6a5601891332 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael McCandless <mikemccand@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:15:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] LUCENE-2166: don't keep warning about the same immense term

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk@891189 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---
 CHANGES.txt                                                 | 3 +++
 .../org/apache/lucene/index/DocFieldProcessorPerThread.java | 6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CHANGES.txt b/CHANGES.txt
index c2a4851294b..0b3ed5dee42 100644
--- a/CHANGES.txt
+++ b/CHANGES.txt
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ Bug fixes
 
 * LUCENE-2142: FieldCacheImpl.getStringIndex no longer throws an
   exception when term count exceeds doc count.  (Mike McCandless)
+
+* LUCENE-2166: Don't incorrectly keep warning about the same immense
+  term, when IndexWriter.infoStream is on.  (Mike McCandless)
   
 New features
 
diff --git a/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocFieldProcessorPerThread.java b/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocFieldProcessorPerThread.java
index 54cc6f47247..31e2ae1f593 100644
--- a/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocFieldProcessorPerThread.java
+++ b/src/java/org/apache/lucene/index/DocFieldProcessorPerThread.java
@@ -245,8 +245,10 @@ final class DocFieldProcessorPerThread extends DocConsumerPerThread {
     for(int i=0;i<fieldCount;i++)
       fields[i].consumer.processFields(fields[i].fields, fields[i].fieldCount);
 
-    if (docState.maxTermPrefix != null && docState.infoStream != null)
-      docState.infoStream.println("WARNING: document contains at least one immense term (longer than the max length " + DocumentsWriter.MAX_TERM_LENGTH + "), all of which were skipped.  Please correct the analyzer to not produce such terms.  The prefix of the first immense term is: '" + docState.maxTermPrefix + "...'"); 
+    if (docState.maxTermPrefix != null && docState.infoStream != null) {
+      docState.infoStream.println("WARNING: document contains at least one immense term (longer than the max length " + DocumentsWriter.MAX_TERM_LENGTH + "), all of which were skipped.  Please correct the analyzer to not produce such terms.  The prefix of the first immense term is: '" + docState.maxTermPrefix + "...'");
+      docState.maxTermPrefix = null;
+    }
 
     final DocumentsWriter.DocWriter one = fieldsWriter.finishDocument();
     final DocumentsWriter.DocWriter two = consumer.finishDocument();