* LUCENE-9909: Some jflex regeneration tasks should have proper dependencies and also check the checksums of included files.
* Force a dependency on low-level spotless tasks so that they're always properly ordered (hell!). Update ASCIITLD and regenerate the remaining code. Add cross-dependencies between generation tasks that take includes as input.
The compilation of the library is slow, disable optimization as it doesn't speed up our usage of the gennorm2 tool.
Use better heuristic for make parallelism (tests.jvms rather than just hardcoded value of four).
Add a simple regeneration help doc
Improve task help and checksum failure message (include corresponding regeneration task). Sorry for being verbose. Maybe somebody will read it. :)
Co-authored-by: Dawid Weiss <dawid.weiss@carrotsearch.com>
This adds a bit of simplicity as the file is a simple domain list,
rather than a DNS zone. So the regexes parsing DNS can be removed.
Also the file may change less often as it contains JUST the list of
TLDs, and not any additional DNS metadata.
Fails the linter if an exception is swallowed (e.g. variable completely
unused).
If this is intentional for some reason, the exception can simply by
annotated with @SuppressWarnings("unused").
This enables quite a few javac warnings from java11+ that weren't
enabled for some reason. None of them fail, so lock them in.
Additionally some newer checks are only recognized for newer JDK
versions, so they are only enabled based on the javac version used. They
will cause no annoyance because they relate to newer language features.
Detects common cases of unreachable/dead code.
For generated javacc code, the check is disabled via
SuppressWarnings("unused") because javacc generates strange/bad code such as:
if ("" == null)
For TestStressNRTReplication's startNode() method, the check is also
disabled because analysis folds the "test evilness controls" which are
static final constants. This itself is a WTF, shouldn't we instead
randomize these evil things in our tests rather than hardcoding them to
specific values?
Requiring the annotation is helpful because if an abstract method is removed, the concrete methods will then show up as compile errors: preventing dead code from being accidentally left behind.
Co-authored-by: Robert Muir <rmuir@apache.org>
