This commit introduces a new way for Solr to do backups (with a new
underlying file structure). This new "incremental" backup process
improves over the existing backup mechanism in several ways:
- multiple backups "points" can now be stored at a given backup
location/name, allowing users to choose which point in time they want
to restore
- subsequent backups skip over uploading files that were uploaded by
previous backups, saving time and network time.
- files are checksumed as they're uploaded, ensuring that corrupted
indices aren't persisted and accidentally restored later.
Incremental backups are now the default, and traditional backups
should now be considered 'deprecated' but can still be created by
passing an `incremental=false` parameter on backup requests.
Our policy is to not maintain write logic for old formats that can't be written
to. The write logic is moved to the test folder to support unit testing.
We fail to close the merged readers of an aborted merge if its
output segment contains no document.
This bug was discovered by a test in Elasticsearch
(elastic/elasticsearch#67884).
* Creating Scripting contrib module to centralize the less secure code related to scripts.
* tweak the changelog and update notice to explain why the name changed and the security posture thinking
* the test script happens to be a currency.xml, which made me think we were doing something specific to currency types, but instead any xml formatted file will suffice for the test.
* Update solr/contrib/scripting/src/java/org/apache/solr/scripting/update/ScriptUpdateProcessorFactory.java
* Update solr/contrib/scripting/src/java/org/apache/solr/scripting/update/package-info.java
* drop the ing, and be more specific on the name of the ref guide page
* comment out the script update chain.
The sample techproducts configSet is used by many of the solr unit tests, and by default doesn't have access to the jar file in the contrib module. This is commented out, similar to how the lang contrib is.
* using a Mock for the script processor in order to keep the trusted configSets tests all together.
* tweak since we are using a mock script processor
Co-authored-by: David Smiley <dsmiley@apache.org>
When we are creating a new thread we should give it a descriptive name and enforce this via ForbiddenAPIs. This doesn't apply to Runnable or Callable objects that we pass to an executor, since those should be getting named by the executor itself.
We don't require this in tests because the tests should be more self contained and there is less benefit in descriptive names. If somebody is already profiling a test, then they likely have the context to understand what the unnamed threads are doing, whereas a thread dump from a running Solr instance should have good thread names for everything. This is especially helpful when doing profiling, otherwise we end up with a bunch of Thread-# that are hard to tell apart and search on.
Jason Gerlowski
Dawid Weiss
Peter Gromov
Michael Sokolov
Mike Drob
Chris Hostetter
Julie Tibshirani
Andrzej Bialecki
Nazerke Seidan
orenovadia
sbeniwal12
Nhat Nguyen
zacharymorn
András Salamon
Mike McCandless
cammiemw
Patrick Zhai
Eric Pugh
Tim Dillon
Tim Owen
Cassandra Targett
Joel Bernstein