2003-10-14 12:00:01 -04:00
|
|
|
Trying to get a large set of use cases that we can use to help drive
|
|
|
|
development in the right direction. I would like to collect some here and then
|
|
|
|
post them to the wiki as examples users can template to express what their
|
|
|
|
use cases are. So my first example is something I chatted about with Aslak
|
|
|
|
this morning. So they are brief and possibly naive but a huge collection
|
|
|
|
of these would help I think.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Being able to write artifact handler that would operate to install an
|
2003-10-14 12:08:12 -04:00
|
|
|
xdoclet plugin correctly when an xdoclet plugin is stated as a dependency.
|
2003-10-14 13:19:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- With Maven installed it should be a simple command that allows you to
|
|
|
|
checkout the sources for a project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Unified source directory structure that is analagous to the repository
|
|
|
|
itself. This way locations of intermediary artifacts of a build would be
|
|
|
|
in a known location. This would also help with developer setup i.e. getting
|
|
|
|
new developers up and running. They could run a maven command and have all
|
|
|
|
their source trees set up in the same way as their collegues.
|
2003-10-15 15:36:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- I would like to be able to execute some goals (like 'clean') even when
|
|
|
|
not all dependencies are satisfied
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Support for transitive and group dependencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- It should be easy to create a single report without a need to (call like it has place now)
|
|
|
|
maven:site. It will be nice if report generators can produce docs in few diffrent formats
|
|
|
|
(e.g pdf, html, rtf) and this format can be also choosen for group of reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- groupId
|
2003-10-15 15:44:42 -04:00
|
|
|
- Let's assume that there exists an artifact type "web-component"
|
|
|
|
which is a zip file containg css/js/gifs/jpegs etc
|
2003-10-15 15:36:51 -04:00
|
|
|
Example of such artifact is for example distribution of tigris style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say an user has declared the following dependency:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<depenedency>
|
|
|
|
<groupId>org.tigris</groupId>
|
|
|
|
<artifactId>style</artifactId>
|
|
|
|
<type>web-component</type>
|
|
|
|
<version>2.0</version>
|
|
|
|
</depenedency>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A dependency of this type should be processed only when users assembles the web application
|
|
|
|
(war:webapp goal in maven-old)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In short: user can be able to declare goal decorators and goals should be fine-grained
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Maven is Java Build Tool. It should be well defined what does it mean to "build java project".
|
2003-10-15 15:44:42 -04:00
|
|
|
It means that stages of the process should be well defined.
|
2003-10-15 15:36:51 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pre-compile (this is when tools like JAXB, XDoclet)
|
|
|
|
compile (javac, aspectj)
|
|
|
|
post-compile (aspectj? )
|
|
|
|
pre-jar
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should e.g be possible to use Castor, JAXB plugin, XDoclet plugin without writing a single line
|
2003-10-15 15:44:42 -04:00
|
|
|
of build script. In the ideal case it should be just enough to plug-in XDoclet into process simply
|
|
|
|
by "checking the checkbox in IDE".
|
2003-10-15 15:36:51 -04:00
|
|
|
This is someting what Vincent Massol started in maven-caller plugin. It will be nice to explore this idea.
|
|
|
|
|
2003-10-15 15:44:42 -04:00
|
|
|
- Reorganization of repository layout - are we going to map groupId : "a.b.c.d" to path "a/b/c/d"?
|
2003-10-15 15:36:51 -04:00
|
|
|
Are there some better alternatives?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- (Michal) I have tried to implement "platform dependend dependecies".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<depenedency>
|
|
|
|
<groupId>a</groupId>
|
|
|
|
<artifactId>b</artifactId>
|
|
|
|
<type>native</type>
|
|
|
|
<version>2.0</version>
|
|
|
|
</depenedency>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
is resolved as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a/b-2.0.dll (on windows) or a/b-2.0.so (unix)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it can/should be done differently?
|
|
|
|
What other "platform depended" artifact type do we have?
|
|
|
|
exe? shell-script?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- how to declare a dependency on JDK and what are possible implications of such dependency
|
|
|
|
(e.g javac/javadoc target jdk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|