PR: MNG-820

ensure only the right dependencies are used when two different versions have different deps.

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/components/trunk@291563 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
Brett Leslie Porter 2005-09-26 05:52:36 +00:00
parent 7d1fb02010
commit d955fbef5c
3 changed files with 228 additions and 104 deletions

View File

@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ import org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.ArtifactVersion;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.OverConstrainedVersionException;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.versioning.VersionRange;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.HashSet;
@ -72,17 +73,21 @@ public class DefaultArtifactCollector
for ( Iterator i = resolvedArtifacts.values().iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
{
ResolutionNode node = (ResolutionNode) i.next();
if ( !node.equals( root ) )
List nodes = (List) i.next();
for ( Iterator j = nodes.iterator(); j.hasNext(); )
{
Artifact artifact = node.getArtifact();
// If it was optional, we don't add it or its children, just allow the update of the version and scope
if ( !node.getArtifact().isOptional() )
ResolutionNode node = (ResolutionNode) j.next();
if ( !node.equals( root ) && node.isActive() )
{
artifact.setDependencyTrail( node.getDependencyTrail() );
Artifact artifact = node.getArtifact();
set.add( node );
// If it was optional, we don't add it or its children, just allow the update of the version and scope
if ( !node.getArtifact().isOptional() )
{
artifact.setDependencyTrail( node.getDependencyTrail() );
set.add( node );
}
}
}
}
@ -122,130 +127,156 @@ public class DefaultArtifactCollector
}
}
ResolutionNode previous = (ResolutionNode) resolvedArtifacts.get( key );
if ( previous != null )
List previousNodes = (List) resolvedArtifacts.get( key );
if ( previousNodes != null )
{
// TODO: use as conflict resolver(s), chain and introduce version mediation
VersionRange previousRange = previous.getArtifact().getVersionRange();
VersionRange currentRange = node.getArtifact().getVersionRange();
for ( Iterator i = previousNodes.iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
{
ResolutionNode previous = (ResolutionNode) i.next();
if ( previousRange == null )
{
// version was already resolved
node.getArtifact().setVersion( previous.getArtifact().getVersion() );
}
else if ( currentRange == null )
{
// version was already resolved
previous.getArtifact().setVersion( node.getArtifact().getVersion() );
}
else
{
// TODO: shouldn't need to double up on this work, only done for simplicity of handling recommended
// version but the restriction is identical
previous.getArtifact().setVersionRange( previousRange.restrict( currentRange ) );
node.getArtifact().setVersionRange( currentRange.restrict( previousRange ) );
}
if ( previous.isActive() )
{
// Version mediation
VersionRange previousRange = previous.getArtifact().getVersionRange();
VersionRange currentRange = node.getArtifact().getVersionRange();
// previous one is more dominant
if ( previous.getDepth() <= node.getDepth() )
{
checkScopeUpdate( node, previous, listeners );
}
else
{
checkScopeUpdate( previous, node, listeners );
}
// TODO: why do we force the version on it? what if they don't match?
if ( previousRange == null )
{
// version was already resolved
node.getArtifact().setVersion( previous.getArtifact().getVersion() );
}
else if ( currentRange == null )
{
// version was already resolved
previous.getArtifact().setVersion( node.getArtifact().getVersion() );
}
else
{
// TODO: shouldn't need to double up on this work, only done for simplicity of handling recommended
// version but the restriction is identical
previous.getArtifact().setVersionRange( previousRange.restrict( currentRange ) );
node.getArtifact().setVersionRange( currentRange.restrict( previousRange ) );
}
if ( previous.getDepth() <= node.getDepth() )
{
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.OMIT_FOR_NEARER, listeners, node, previous.getArtifact() );
return;
// Conflict Resolution
// TODO: use as conflict resolver(s), chain
// TODO: should this be part of mediation?
// previous one is more dominant
if ( previous.getDepth() <= node.getDepth() )
{
checkScopeUpdate( node, previous, listeners );
}
else
{
checkScopeUpdate( previous, node, listeners );
}
if ( previous.getDepth() <= node.getDepth() )
{
// previous was nearer
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.OMIT_FOR_NEARER, listeners, node, previous.getArtifact() );
node.disable();
}
else
{
previous.disable();
}
}
}
}
resolvedArtifacts.put( key, node );
else
{
previousNodes = new ArrayList();
resolvedArtifacts.put( key, previousNodes );
}
previousNodes.add( node );
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.INCLUDE_ARTIFACT, listeners, node );
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.PROCESS_CHILDREN, listeners, node );
for ( Iterator i = node.getChildrenIterator(); i.hasNext(); )
if ( node.isActive() )
{
ResolutionNode child = (ResolutionNode) i.next();
// We leave in optional ones, but don't pick up its dependencies
if ( !child.isResolved() && !child.getArtifact().isOptional() )
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.PROCESS_CHILDREN, listeners, node );
for ( Iterator i = node.getChildrenIterator(); i.hasNext(); )
{
Artifact artifact = child.getArtifact();
try
ResolutionNode child = (ResolutionNode) i.next();
// We leave in optional ones, but don't pick up its dependencies
if ( !child.isResolved() && !child.getArtifact().isOptional() )
{
if ( artifact.getVersion() == null )
Artifact artifact = child.getArtifact();
try
{
// set the recommended version
VersionRange versionRange = artifact.getVersionRange();
// TODO: maybe its better to just pass the range through to retrieval and use a transformation?
ArtifactVersion version;
if ( !versionRange.isSelectedVersionKnown() )
if ( artifact.getVersion() == null )
{
List versions = artifact.getAvailableVersions();
if ( versions == null )
{
versions = source.retrieveAvailableVersions( artifact, localRepository,
remoteRepositories );
artifact.setAvailableVersions( versions );
}
// set the recommended version
VersionRange versionRange = artifact.getVersionRange();
version = versionRange.matchVersion( versions );
if ( version == null )
// TODO: maybe its better to just pass the range through to retrieval and use a transformation?
ArtifactVersion version;
if ( !versionRange.isSelectedVersionKnown() )
{
if ( versions.isEmpty() )
List versions = artifact.getAvailableVersions();
if ( versions == null )
{
throw new OverConstrainedVersionException(
"No versions are present in the repository for the artifact with a range " +
versionRange );
versions = source.retrieveAvailableVersions( artifact, localRepository,
remoteRepositories );
artifact.setAvailableVersions( versions );
}
else
version = versionRange.matchVersion( versions );
if ( version == null )
{
throw new OverConstrainedVersionException(
"Couldn't find a version in " + versions + " to match range " + versionRange );
if ( versions.isEmpty() )
{
throw new OverConstrainedVersionException(
"No versions are present in the repository for the artifact with a range " +
versionRange );
}
else
{
throw new OverConstrainedVersionException( "Couldn't find a version in " +
versions + " to match range " + versionRange );
}
}
}
}
else
{
version = versionRange.getSelectedVersion();
else
{
version = versionRange.getSelectedVersion();
}
artifact.selectVersion( version.toString() );
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.SELECT_VERSION_FROM_RANGE, listeners, child );
}
artifact.selectVersion( version.toString() );
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.SELECT_VERSION_FROM_RANGE, listeners, child );
ResolutionGroup rGroup = source.retrieve( artifact, localRepository, remoteRepositories );
child.addDependencies( rGroup.getArtifacts(), rGroup.getResolutionRepositories(), filter );
}
catch ( CyclicDependencyException e )
{
// would like to throw this, but we have crappy stuff in the repo
// no logger to use here either just now
// TODO: should the remoteRepositories list be null here?!
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.OMIT_FOR_CYCLE, listeners,
new ResolutionNode( e.getArtifact(), null, child ) );
}
catch ( ArtifactMetadataRetrievalException e )
{
artifact.setDependencyTrail( node.getDependencyTrail() );
throw new TransitiveArtifactResolutionException( e.getMessage(), artifact, remoteRepositories,
e );
}
ResolutionGroup rGroup = source.retrieve( artifact, localRepository, remoteRepositories );
child.addDependencies( rGroup.getArtifacts(), rGroup.getResolutionRepositories(), filter );
recurse( child, resolvedArtifacts, managedVersions, localRepository, remoteRepositories, source,
filter, listeners );
}
catch ( CyclicDependencyException e )
{
// would like to throw this, but we have crappy stuff in the repo
// no logger to use here either just now
// TODO: should the remoteRepositories list be null here?!
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.OMIT_FOR_CYCLE, listeners,
new ResolutionNode( e.getArtifact(), null, child ) );
}
catch ( ArtifactMetadataRetrievalException e )
{
artifact.setDependencyTrail( node.getDependencyTrail() );
throw new TransitiveArtifactResolutionException( e.getMessage(), artifact, remoteRepositories, e );
}
recurse( child, resolvedArtifacts, managedVersions, localRepository, remoteRepositories, source, filter,
listeners );
}
}
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.FINISH_PROCESSING_CHILDREN, listeners, node );
fireEvent( ResolutionListener.FINISH_PROCESSING_CHILDREN, listeners, node );
}
}
private void checkScopeUpdate( ResolutionNode node, ResolutionNode previous, List listeners )

View File

@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ public class ResolutionNode
private final List remoteRepositories;
private boolean active = true;
public ResolutionNode( Artifact artifact, List remoteRepositories )
{
this.artifact = artifact;
@ -144,4 +146,35 @@ public class ResolutionNode
return remoteRepositories;
}
public boolean isActive()
{
return active;
}
public void enable()
{
this.active = true;
// TODO: if it was null, we really need to go find them now... or is this taken care of by the ordering?
if ( children != null )
{
for ( Iterator i = children.iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
{
ResolutionNode node = (ResolutionNode) i.next();
node.enable();
}
}
}
public void disable()
{
this.active = false;
if ( children != null )
{
for ( Iterator i = children.iterator(); i.hasNext(); )
{
ResolutionNode node = (ResolutionNode) i.next();
node.disable();
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -123,6 +123,66 @@ public class DefaultArtifactCollectorTest
assertEquals( "Check artifact list", createSet( new Object[]{a.artifact, c.artifact} ), res.getArtifacts() );
}
public void testResolveCorrectDependenciesWhenDifferentDependenciesOnNearest()
throws ArtifactResolutionException, InvalidVersionSpecificationException
{
ArtifactSpec a = createArtifact( "a", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec b = a.addDependency( "b", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec c2 = b.addDependency( "c", "2.0" );
c2.addDependency( "d", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec e = createArtifact( "e", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec c1 = e.addDependency( "c", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec f = c1.addDependency( "f", "1.0" );
ArtifactResolutionResult res = collect( createSet( new Object[]{a.artifact, e.artifact} ) );
assertEquals( "Check artifact list",
createSet( new Object[]{a.artifact, b.artifact, e.artifact, c1.artifact, f.artifact} ),
res.getArtifacts() );
assertEquals( "Check version", "1.0", getArtifact( "c", res.getArtifacts() ).getVersion() );
}
public void disabledtestResolveCorrectDependenciesWhenDifferentDependenciesOnNewest()
throws ArtifactResolutionException, InvalidVersionSpecificationException
{
// TODO: use newest conflict resolver
ArtifactSpec a = createArtifact( "a", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec b = a.addDependency( "b", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec c2 = b.addDependency( "c", "2.0" );
ArtifactSpec d = c2.addDependency( "d", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec e = createArtifact( "e", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec c1 = e.addDependency( "c", "1.0" );
c1.addDependency( "f", "1.0" );
ArtifactResolutionResult res = collect( createSet( new Object[]{a.artifact, e.artifact} ) );
assertEquals( "Check artifact list",
createSet( new Object[]{a.artifact, b.artifact, e.artifact, c2.artifact, d.artifact} ),
res.getArtifacts() );
assertEquals( "Check version", "2.0", getArtifact( "c", res.getArtifacts() ).getVersion() );
}
public void disabledtestResolveCorrectDependenciesWhenDifferentDependenciesOnNewestVersionReplaced()
throws ArtifactResolutionException, InvalidVersionSpecificationException
{
// TODO: use newest conflict resolver
ArtifactSpec a = createArtifact( "a", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec b1 = a.addDependency( "b", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec c = a.addDependency( "c", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec d2 = b1.addDependency( "d", "2.0" );
d2.addDependency( "h", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec d1 = c.addDependency( "d", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec b2 = c.addDependency( "b", "2.0" );
ArtifactSpec e = b2.addDependency( "e", "1.0" );
ArtifactSpec g = d1.addDependency( "g", "1.0" );
ArtifactResolutionResult res = collect( createSet( new Object[]{a.artifact} ) );
Object[] artifacts = new Object[]{a.artifact, c.artifact, d1.artifact, b2.artifact, e.artifact, g.artifact};
assertEquals( "Check artifact list", createSet( artifacts ), res.getArtifacts() );
assertEquals( "Check version", "1.0", getArtifact( "d", res.getArtifacts() ).getVersion() );
assertEquals( "Check version", "2.0", getArtifact( "b", res.getArtifacts() ).getVersion() );
}
public void testResolveNearestNewestIsNearest()
throws ArtifactResolutionException, InvalidVersionSpecificationException
{