mirror of https://github.com/apache/nifi.git
NIFI-843: Ensure that a new HashMap is used when populating the propertyMap member variable for thread safety
This commit is contained in:
parent
5962404379
commit
e9c2535df7
|
@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ import org.apache.nifi.annotation.behavior.SupportsBatching;
|
|||
import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.CapabilityDescription;
|
||||
import org.apache.nifi.annotation.documentation.Tags;
|
||||
import org.apache.nifi.annotation.lifecycle.OnScheduled;
|
||||
import org.apache.nifi.annotation.lifecycle.OnStopped;
|
||||
import org.apache.nifi.components.AllowableValue;
|
||||
import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
|
||||
import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyValue;
|
||||
|
@ -106,8 +105,7 @@ public class RouteOnAttribute extends AbstractProcessor {
|
|||
private volatile Set<String> dynamicPropertyNames = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Cache of dynamic properties set during {@link #onScheduled(ProcessContext)} and
|
||||
* cleared during {@link #onStopped(ProcessContext)} for quick access in
|
||||
* Cache of dynamic properties set during {@link #onScheduled(ProcessContext)} for quick access in
|
||||
* {@link #onTrigger(ProcessContext, ProcessSession)}
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private volatile Map<Relationship, PropertyValue> propertyMap = new HashMap<>();
|
||||
|
@ -182,20 +180,18 @@ public class RouteOnAttribute extends AbstractProcessor {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
@OnScheduled
|
||||
public void onScheduled(final ProcessContext context) {
|
||||
final Map<Relationship, PropertyValue> newPropertyMap = new HashMap<>();
|
||||
for (final PropertyDescriptor descriptor : context.getProperties().keySet()) {
|
||||
if (!descriptor.isDynamic()) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
getLogger().debug("Adding new dynamic property: {}", new Object[]{descriptor});
|
||||
propertyMap.put(new Relationship.Builder().name(descriptor.getName()).build(), context.getProperty(descriptor));
|
||||
newPropertyMap.put(new Relationship.Builder().name(descriptor.getName()).build(), context.getProperty(descriptor));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
this.propertyMap = newPropertyMap;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@OnStopped
|
||||
public void onStopped() {
|
||||
getLogger().debug("Clearing propertyMap");
|
||||
propertyMap.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session) {
|
||||
|
@ -206,8 +202,9 @@ public class RouteOnAttribute extends AbstractProcessor {
|
|||
|
||||
final ProcessorLog logger = getLogger();
|
||||
|
||||
final Map<Relationship, PropertyValue> propMap = this.propertyMap;
|
||||
final Set<Relationship> matchingRelationships = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
for (final Map.Entry<Relationship, PropertyValue> entry : propertyMap.entrySet()) {
|
||||
for (final Map.Entry<Relationship, PropertyValue> entry : propMap.entrySet()) {
|
||||
final PropertyValue value = entry.getValue();
|
||||
|
||||
final boolean matches = value.evaluateAttributeExpressions(flowFile).asBoolean();
|
||||
|
@ -219,7 +216,7 @@ public class RouteOnAttribute extends AbstractProcessor {
|
|||
final Set<Relationship> destinationRelationships = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
switch (context.getProperty(ROUTE_STRATEGY).getValue()) {
|
||||
case routeAllMatchValue:
|
||||
if (matchingRelationships.size() == propertyMap.size()) {
|
||||
if (matchingRelationships.size() == propMap.size()) {
|
||||
destinationRelationships.add(REL_MATCH);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
destinationRelationships.add(REL_NO_MATCH);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue