Use a different arbitrary value for the ID of the comment shape type. This appears to prevent Excel >= 2010 from turning POI-written comments into the wrong shape (giant curved arrow).

Fixes https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55410

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1683315 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
David North 2015-06-03 12:50:10 +00:00
parent f998d39515
commit 32e8fac65c
2 changed files with 4 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ public final class XSSFVMLDrawing extends POIXMLDocumentPart {
private static final QName QNAME_SHAPE_LAYOUT = new QName("urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office", "shapelayout"); private static final QName QNAME_SHAPE_LAYOUT = new QName("urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office", "shapelayout");
private static final QName QNAME_SHAPE_TYPE = new QName("urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml", "shapetype"); private static final QName QNAME_SHAPE_TYPE = new QName("urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml", "shapetype");
private static final QName QNAME_SHAPE = new QName("urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml", "shape"); private static final QName QNAME_SHAPE = new QName("urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml", "shape");
private static final String COMMENT_SHAPE_TYPE_ID = "_x0000_t202"; // this ID value seems to have significance to Excel >= 2010; see https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409
/** /**
* regexp to parse shape ids, in VML they have weird form of id="_x0000_s1026" * regexp to parse shape ids, in VML they have weird form of id="_x0000_s1026"
@ -190,7 +191,7 @@ public final class XSSFVMLDrawing extends POIXMLDocumentPart {
_qnames.add(QNAME_SHAPE_LAYOUT); _qnames.add(QNAME_SHAPE_LAYOUT);
CTShapetype shapetype = CTShapetype.Factory.newInstance(); CTShapetype shapetype = CTShapetype.Factory.newInstance();
_shapeTypeId = "_xssf_cell_comment"; _shapeTypeId = COMMENT_SHAPE_TYPE_ID;
shapetype.setId(_shapeTypeId); shapetype.setId(_shapeTypeId);
shapetype.setCoordsize("21600,21600"); shapetype.setCoordsize("21600,21600");
shapetype.setSpt(202); shapetype.setSpt(202);

View File

@ -54,14 +54,14 @@ public class TestXSSFVMLDrawing extends TestCase {
assertEquals("21600,21600", type.getCoordsize()); assertEquals("21600,21600", type.getCoordsize());
assertEquals(202.0f, type.getSpt()); assertEquals(202.0f, type.getSpt());
assertEquals("m,l,21600r21600,l21600,xe", type.getPath2()); assertEquals("m,l,21600r21600,l21600,xe", type.getPath2());
assertEquals("_xssf_cell_comment", type.getId()); assertEquals("_x0000_t202", type.getId());
assertEquals(STTrueFalse.T, type.getPathArray(0).getGradientshapeok()); assertEquals(STTrueFalse.T, type.getPathArray(0).getGradientshapeok());
assertEquals(STConnectType.RECT, type.getPathArray(0).getConnecttype()); assertEquals(STConnectType.RECT, type.getPathArray(0).getConnecttype());
CTShape shape = vml.newCommentShape(); CTShape shape = vml.newCommentShape();
assertEquals(3, items.size()); assertEquals(3, items.size());
assertSame(items.get(2), shape); assertSame(items.get(2), shape);
assertEquals("#_xssf_cell_comment", shape.getType()); assertEquals("#_x0000_t202", shape.getType());
assertEquals("position:absolute; visibility:hidden", shape.getStyle()); assertEquals("position:absolute; visibility:hidden", shape.getStyle());
assertEquals("#ffffe1", shape.getFillcolor()); assertEquals("#ffffe1", shape.getFillcolor());
assertEquals(STInsetMode.AUTO, shape.getInsetmode()); assertEquals(STInsetMode.AUTO, shape.getInsetmode());