Add test to verify that bug 61532 is fixed as far as I see via the changes for bug 61148.

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1808932 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
This commit is contained in:
Dominik Stadler 2017-09-19 19:19:30 +00:00
parent ecf7d0f277
commit cf2265d0b0
1 changed files with 29 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -17,16 +17,13 @@
package org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull;
import static org.junit.Assert.assertSame;
import static org.junit.Assert.fail;
import java.io.IOException;
import org.apache.poi.ss.ITestDataProvider;
import org.junit.Test;
import static org.junit.Assert.*;
/**
* Common superclass for testing implementation of {@link FormulaEvaluator}
*/
@ -600,4 +597,31 @@ public abstract class BaseTestFormulaEvaluator {
private Cell getCell(Sheet sheet, int rowNo, int column) {
return sheet.getRow(rowNo).getCell(column);
}
@Test
public void testBug61532() throws IOException {
try (Workbook wb = _testDataProvider.createWorkbook()) {
final Cell cell = wb.createSheet().createRow(0).createCell(0);
cell.setCellFormula("1+2");
assertEquals(0, (int)cell.getNumericCellValue());
assertEquals("1+2", cell.toString());
FormulaEvaluator eval = wb.getCreationHelper().createFormulaEvaluator();
CellValue value = eval.evaluate(cell);
assertEquals(CellType.NUMERIC, value.getCellType());
assertEquals(3.0, value.getNumberValue(), 0.01);
assertEquals(CellType.FORMULA, cell.getCellType());
assertEquals("1+2", cell.getCellFormula());
assertEquals("1+2", cell.toString());
assertNotNull(eval.evaluateInCell(cell));
assertEquals("3.0", cell.toString());
assertEquals(CellType.NUMERIC, cell.getCellType());
assertEquals(3.0, cell.getNumericCellValue(), 0.01);
}
}
}