* add my key to the KEYS file
* update year in NOTICE (first release of 2019)
* remove svn:executable flag from random test data files
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1855799 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
The function still doesn't deal with auto-filtering, but it now handles variations that should skip hidden rows.
Taught the evaluation framework to know about hidden rows similar to what was already there for skipping subtotals within subtotal ranges.
Added unit test cases.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1855789 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
parsed
Add some function-definitions for Excel 4 Macros and missing functions
found in regression tests
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1852277 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
added cell type = formula check when looping through the shared formula range, to ignore any non-formula cells.
Also refactored a bit to enable passing in the evaluation context, as getCellFormula() uses it behind the scenes when evaluating a shared formula cell (has to shift the formula references based on the master cell). Review of these changes is welcome, as always.
Checked all other code referencing the "SHARED" enum, and didn't see anything else that dealt with formula cell values and thus would need to notice non-formula cells.
Added unit test based on the failing file from Bugzilla. Test failed until the fixed code was in place.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1844295 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Refactored the D* function enum to have instances return the function implementation instances rather than using a case construct, now that Java 8 is required.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1819376 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Found some optimizations in the general evaluation framework related to blank cells in rows beyond the last defined row of a sheet.
I don't see any issue with passing a bit of context down deeper into this framework, as it's all POI-internal and only had one calling path.
See the above bug for the performance analysis. Not specifically related to VLOOKUP, but improves that case by more than 2/3 as well.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1817252 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Fixes Bug 61761 Conditional formatting rule evaluation doesn't like comparing cells of different types
fixed, with unit tests.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1815298 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
now evaluating based on cell references instead, and watching out for undefined cells in rules that require a cell.
Added unit test based on previously failing file.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1805245 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
One of my users found that my initial implementation was lacking a core distinction - most evaluations expect a single result, and "unwrap" 2/3D ValueEval results to a single value based on the input row/column.
However, data validation list formulas explicitly are expected to return a 2D ValueEval. This worked when the formula was simple and evaluated to a single Ptg, but only returned one value when the formula was more complex, or referenced a named range defined as a complex formula.
This change teaches WorkbookEvaluator about the distinction, by way of a new attribute for FormulaType.
There is room for discussion over how it is implemented, but this works for me.
Includes the failing workbook we had as a new unit test.
While I was in FormulaType I went ahead and removed the deprecated, unused, and redundant code marked for removal in 3.17.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/poi/trunk@1803121 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Dominik Stadler
PJ Fanning
Andreas Beeker
Tim Allison
Greg Woolsey
Yegor Kozlov
Alain Béarez