From 3721a04979f3d7ddaa3c81f2f0e246b9104b20b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Alex <ben.alex@springsource.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:33:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Fixes.

---
 doc/xdocs/articles.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/xdocs/articles.html b/doc/xdocs/articles.html
index b53971861c..84bbe70602 100644
--- a/doc/xdocs/articles.html
+++ b/doc/xdocs/articles.html
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
   <p>Here are some of the external pages mentioning Acegi Security. If you've
 	found another, please let us know.
   <ul>
-    <li><b><a href="http://www.springframework.org">Spring Forums</a></b>:
+    <li><b><a href="http://forum.springframework.org">Spring Forums</a></b>:
 		The first place to look for Acegi Security support (use the 'search' function).<br><br>
 	</li>
     <li><b><a href="mail-lists.html">Acegi Security Mailing Lists</a></b>:
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 		Matthew Porter wrote this good introductory article for Javalobby.<br><br>
 	</li>
     <li><b><a href="http://www.almaer.com/blog/archives/000640.html">Container Managed Security: If your standard covers a lowest common denominator</a></b>:
-		"For this reason I end up using something like Acegi Security", Dion comments after listing a series of missing hooks from the Servlet Spec security approach.<br><br>
+		"For this reason I end up using something like Acegi Security", Dion Almaer comments after listing a series of missing hooks from the Servlet Spec security approach.<br><br>
 	</li>
     <li><b><a href="http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/20050104#re_j2ee_app_server_security">J2EE App Server Security</a></b>:
 		"After using Acegi for the last month, I think I'm going to ditch the 'standard' J2EE security stuff", blogged Matt Raible. I should note