commit
42a00e2003
|
@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ SecurityFilterChain web(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
|
|||
.requestMatchers("/resources/**", "/signup", "/about").permitAll() // <2>
|
||||
.requestMatchers("/admin/**").hasRole("ADMIN") // <3>
|
||||
.requestMatchers("/db/**").access(new WebExpressionAuthorizationManager("hasRole('ADMIN') and hasRole('DBA')")) // <4>
|
||||
.anyRequest().denyAll() // <5>
|
||||
// .requestMatchers("/db/**").access(AuthorizationManagers.allOf(AuthorityAuthorizationManager.hasRole("ADMIN"), AuthorityAuthorizationManager.hasRole("DBA"))) // <5>
|
||||
.anyRequest().denyAll() // <6>
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
return http.build();
|
||||
|
@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ Specifically, any user can access a request if the URL starts with "/resources/"
|
|||
You will notice that since we are invoking the `hasRole` method we do not need to specify the "ROLE_" prefix.
|
||||
<4> Any URL that starts with "/db/" requires the user to have both "ROLE_ADMIN" and "ROLE_DBA".
|
||||
You will notice that since we are using the `hasRole` expression we do not need to specify the "ROLE_" prefix.
|
||||
<5> Any URL that has not already been matched on is denied access.
|
||||
<5> The same rule from 4, could be written by combining multiple `AuthorizationManager`.
|
||||
<6> Any URL that has not already been matched on is denied access.
|
||||
This is a good strategy if you do not want to accidentally forget to update your authorization rules.
|
||||
|
||||
You can take a bean-based approach by constructing your own xref:servlet/authorization/architecture.adoc#authz-delegate-authorization-manager[`RequestMatcherDelegatingAuthorizationManager`] like so:
|
||||
|
@ -116,7 +118,7 @@ AuthorizationManager<RequestAuthorizationContext> requestMatcherAuthorizationMan
|
|||
RequestMatcher admin = mvcMatcherBuilder.pattern("/admin/**");
|
||||
RequestMatcher db = mvcMatcherBuilder.pattern("/db/**");
|
||||
RequestMatcher any = AnyRequestMatcher.INSTANCE;
|
||||
AuthorizationManager<HttpRequestServlet> manager = RequestMatcherDelegatingAuthorizationManager.builder()
|
||||
AuthorizationManager<HttpServletRequest> manager = RequestMatcherDelegatingAuthorizationManager.builder()
|
||||
.add(permitAll, (context) -> new AuthorizationDecision(true))
|
||||
.add(admin, AuthorityAuthorizationManager.hasRole("ADMIN"))
|
||||
.add(db, AuthorityAuthorizationManager.hasRole("DBA"))
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ You could then refer to the method as follows:
|
|||
----
|
||||
http
|
||||
.authorizeHttpRequests(authorize -> authorize
|
||||
.requestMatchers("/user/**").access("@webSecurity.check(authentication,request)")
|
||||
.requestMatchers("/user/**").access(new WebExpressionAuthorizationManager("@webSecurity.check(authentication,request)"))
|
||||
...
|
||||
)
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue