Explain the rational about deprecating .and() and non-lambda DSL methods
Closes gh-13094
This commit is contained in:
parent
07b884a2cb
commit
8481374ce7
|
@ -6,8 +6,6 @@ The following steps relate to changes around how to configure `HttpSecurity`, `W
|
|||
|
||||
The Lambda DSL is present in Spring Security since version 5.2, and it allows HTTP security to be configured using lambdas.
|
||||
|
||||
The prior configuration style will not be valid in Spring Security 7 where the usage of the Lambda DSL will be required.
|
||||
|
||||
You may have seen this style of configuration in the Spring Security documentation or samples.
|
||||
Let us take a look at how a lambda configuration of HTTP security compares to the previous configuration style.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -65,6 +63,16 @@ public class SecurityConfig {
|
|||
----
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
The Lambda DSL is the preferred way to configure Spring Security, the prior configuration style will not be valid in Spring Security 7 where the usage of the Lambda DSL will be required.
|
||||
This has been done mainly for a couple of reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
- The previous way it was not clear what object was getting configured without knowing what the return type was.
|
||||
The deeper the nesting the more confusing it became.
|
||||
Even experienced users would think that their configuration was doing one thing when in fact, it was doing something else.
|
||||
|
||||
- Consistency.
|
||||
Many code bases switched between the two styles which caused inconsistencies that made understanding the configuration difficult and often led to misconfigurations.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Lambda DSL Configuration Tips
|
||||
|
||||
When comparing the two samples above, you will notice some key differences:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue