Joshua Sattler 040111ae9e Remove Configuration meta-annotation from Enable* annotations
Before, Spring Security's @Enable* annotations were meta-annotated with @Configuration.
While convenient, this is not consistent with the rest of the Spring projects and most notably
Spring Framework's @Enable annotations. Additionally, the introduction of support for
@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods=false) in Spring Framework provides a compelling reason to
remove @Configuration meta-annotation from Spring Security's @Enable annotations and allow
users to opt into their preferred configuration mode.

Closes gh-6613

Signed-off-by: Joshua Sattler <joshua.sattler@mailbox.org>
2022-07-30 03:48:42 +02:00

110 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext

[[kotlin-config]]
= Kotlin Configuration
Spring Security Kotlin configuration has been available since Spring Security 5.3.
It lets users configure Spring Security by using a native Kotlin DSL.
[NOTE]
====
Spring Security provides https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security-samples/tree/main/servlet/spring-boot/kotlin/hello-security[a sample application] to demonstrate the use of Spring Security Kotlin Configuration.
====
[[kotlin-config-httpsecurity]]
== HttpSecurity
How does Spring Security know that we want to require all users to be authenticated?
How does Spring Security know we want to support form-based authentication?
There is a configuration class (called `SecurityFilterChain`) that is being invoked behind the scenes.
It is configured with the following default implementation:
====
[source,kotlin]
----
@Bean
open fun filterChain(http: HttpSecurity): SecurityFilterChain {
http {
authorizeRequests {
authorize(anyRequest, authenticated)
}
formLogin { }
httpBasic { }
}
return http.build()
}
----
====
The default configuration (shown in the preceding listing):
* Ensures that any request to our application requires the user to be authenticated
* Lets users authenticate with form-based login
* Lets users authenticate with HTTP Basic authentication
Note that this configuration is parallels the XML namespace configuration:
====
[source,xml]
----
<http>
<intercept-url pattern="/**" access="authenticated"/>
<form-login />
<http-basic />
</http>
----
====
== Multiple HttpSecurity Instances
We can configure multiple `HttpSecurity` instances, just as we can have multiple `<http>` blocks.
The key is to register multiple `SecurityFilterChain` ``@Bean``s.
The following example has a different configuration for URL's that start with `/api/`:
====
[source,kotlin]
----
@Configuration
@EnableWebSecurity
class MultiHttpSecurityConfig {
@Bean <1>
public fun userDetailsService(): UserDetailsService {
val users: User.UserBuilder = User.withDefaultPasswordEncoder()
val manager = InMemoryUserDetailsManager()
manager.createUser(users.username("user").password("password").roles("USER").build())
manager.createUser(users.username("admin").password("password").roles("USER","ADMIN").build())
return manager
}
@Order(1) <2>
@Bean
open fun apiFilterChain(http: HttpSecurity): SecurityFilterChain {
http {
securityMatcher("/api/**") <3>
authorizeRequests {
authorize(anyRequest, hasRole("ADMIN"))
}
httpBasic { }
}
return http.build()
}
@Bean <4>
open fun formLoginFilterChain(http: HttpSecurity): SecurityFilterChain {
http {
authorizeRequests {
authorize(anyRequest, authenticated)
}
formLogin { }
}
return http.build()
}
}
----
<1> Configure Authentication as usual.
<2> Create an instance of `SecurityFilterChain` that contains `@Order` to specify which `SecurityFilterChain` should be considered first.
<3> The `http.antMatcher` states that this `HttpSecurity` is applicable only to URLs that start with `/api/`
<4> Create another instance of `SecurityFilterChain`.
If the URL does not start with `/api/`, this configuration is used.
This configuration is considered after `apiFilterChain`, since it has an `@Order` value after `1` (no `@Order` defaults to last).
====