* FEATURE: Tool name validation
- Add unique index to the name column of the ai_tools table
- correct our tests for AiToolController
- tool_name field which will be used to represent to LLM
- Add tool_name to Tools's presets
- Add duplicate tools validation for AiPersona
- Add unique constraint to the name column of the ai_tools table
* DEV: Validate duplicate tool_name between builin tools and custom tools
* lint
* chore: fix linting
* fix conlict mistakes
* chore: correct icon class
* chore: fix failed specs
* Add max_length to tool_name
* chore: correct the option name
* lintings
* fix lintings
### Why
This pull request fundamentally restructures how AI bots create and update web artifacts to address critical limitations in the previous approach:
1. **Improved Artifact Context for LLMs**: Previously, artifact creation and update tools included the *entire* artifact source code directly in the tool arguments. This overloaded the Language Model (LLM) with raw code, making it difficult for the LLM to maintain a clear understanding of the artifact's current state when applying changes. The LLM would struggle to differentiate between the base artifact and the requested modifications, leading to confusion and less effective updates.
2. **Reduced Token Usage and History Bloat**: Including the full artifact source code in every tool interaction was extremely token-inefficient. As conversations progressed, this redundant code in the history consumed a significant number of tokens unnecessarily. This not only increased costs but also diluted the context for the LLM with less relevant historical information.
3. **Enabling Updates for Large Artifacts**: The lack of a practical diff or targeted update mechanism made it nearly impossible to efficiently update larger web artifacts. Sending the entire source code for every minor change was both computationally expensive and prone to errors, effectively blocking the use of AI bots for meaningful modifications of complex artifacts.
**This pull request addresses these core issues by**:
* Introducing methods for the AI bot to explicitly *read* and understand the current state of an artifact.
* Implementing efficient update strategies that send *targeted* changes rather than the entire artifact source code.
* Providing options to control the level of artifact context included in LLM prompts, optimizing token usage.
### What
The main changes implemented in this PR to resolve the above issues are:
1. **`Read Artifact` Tool for Contextual Awareness**:
- A new `read_artifact` tool is introduced, enabling AI bots to fetch and process the current content of a web artifact from a given URL (local or external).
- This provides the LLM with a clear and up-to-date representation of the artifact's HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, improving its understanding of the base to be modified.
- By cloning local artifacts, it allows the bot to work with a fresh copy, further enhancing context and control.
2. **Refactored `Update Artifact` Tool with Efficient Strategies**:
- The `update_artifact` tool is redesigned to employ more efficient update strategies, minimizing token usage and improving update precision:
- **`diff` strategy**: Utilizes a search-and-replace diff algorithm to apply only the necessary, targeted changes to the artifact's code. This significantly reduces the amount of code sent to the LLM and focuses its attention on the specific modifications.
- **`full` strategy**: Provides the option to replace the entire content sections (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) when a complete rewrite is required.
- Tool options enhance the control over the update process:
- `editor_llm`: Allows selection of a specific LLM for artifact updates, potentially optimizing for code editing tasks.
- `update_algorithm`: Enables choosing between `diff` and `full` update strategies based on the nature of the required changes.
- `do_not_echo_artifact`: Defaults to true, and by *not* echoing the artifact in prompts, it further reduces token consumption in scenarios where the LLM might not need the full artifact context for every update step (though effectiveness might be slightly reduced in certain update scenarios).
3. **System and General Persona Tool Option Visibility and Customization**:
- Tool options, including those for system personas, are made visible and editable in the admin UI. This allows administrators to fine-tune the behavior of all personas and their tools, including setting specific LLMs or update algorithms. This was previously limited or hidden for system personas.
4. **Centralized and Improved Content Security Policy (CSP) Management**:
- The CSP for AI artifacts is consolidated and made more maintainable through the `ALLOWED_CDN_SOURCES` constant. This improves code organization and future updates to the allowed CDN list, while maintaining the existing security posture.
5. **Codebase Improvements**:
- Refactoring of diff utilities, introduction of strategy classes, enhanced error handling, new locales, and comprehensive testing all contribute to a more robust, efficient, and maintainable artifact management system.
By addressing the issues of LLM context confusion, token inefficiency, and the limitations of updating large artifacts, this pull request significantly improves the practicality and effectiveness of AI bots in managing web artifacts within Discourse.
* DEV: raise timeout for reasoning LLMs
* FIX: use id to identify llms, not model_name
model_name is not unique, in the case of reasoning models
you may configure the same llm multiple times using different
reasoning levels.
We have a flag to signal we are shortening the embeddings of a model.
Only used in Open AI's text-embedding-3-*, but we plan to use it for other services.
* Use AR model for embeddings features
* endpoints
* Embeddings CRUD UI
* Add presets. Hide a couple more settings
* system specs
* Seed embedding definition from old settings
* Generate search bit index on the fly. cleanup orphaned data
* support for seeded models
* Fix run test for new embedding
* fix selected model not set correctly
Adds a comprehensive quota management system for LLM models that allows:
- Setting per-group (applied per user in the group) token and usage limits with configurable durations
- Tracking and enforcing token/usage limits across user groups
- Quota reset periods (hourly, daily, weekly, or custom)
- Admin UI for managing quotas with real-time updates
This system provides granular control over LLM API usage by allowing admins
to define limits on both total tokens and number of requests per group.
Supports multiple concurrent quotas per model and automatically handles
quota resets.
Co-authored-by: Keegan George <kgeorge13@gmail.com>
This update adds some structure for handling errors in the spam config while also handling a specific error related to the spam scanning user not being an admin account.
- Add spam_score_type to AiSpamSerializer for better integration with reviewables.
- Introduce a custom filter for detecting AI spam false negatives in moderation workflows.
- Refactor spam report generation to improve identification of false negatives.
- Add tests to verify the custom filter and its behavior.
- Introduce links for all spam counts in report
This commit adds an "unavailable" state for the AI semantic search toggle. Currently the AI toggle disappears when the sort by is anything but Relevance which makes the UI confusing for users looking for AI results. This should help!
In this PR, we added functionality to hide the admin header for edit/new actions - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/30175
To make it work properly, we have to rename `show` to `edit` which is also a more accurate name.
This introduces a comprehensive spam detection system that uses LLM models
to automatically identify and flag potential spam posts. The system is
designed to be both powerful and configurable while preventing false positives.
Key Features:
* Automatically scans first 3 posts from new users (TL0/TL1)
* Creates dedicated AI flagging user to distinguish from system flags
* Tracks false positives/negatives for quality monitoring
* Supports custom instructions to fine-tune detection
* Includes test interface for trying detection on any post
Technical Implementation:
* New database tables:
- ai_spam_logs: Stores scan history and results
- ai_moderation_settings: Stores LLM config and custom instructions
* Rate limiting and safeguards:
- Minimum 10-minute delay between rescans
- Only scans significant edits (>10 char difference)
- Maximum 3 scans per post
- 24-hour maximum age for scannable posts
* Admin UI features:
- Real-time testing capabilities
- 7-day statistics dashboard
- Configurable LLM model selection
- Custom instruction support
Security and Performance:
* Respects trust levels - only scans TL0/TL1 users
* Skips private messages entirely
* Stops scanning users after 3 successful public posts
* Includes comprehensive test coverage
* Maintains audit log of all scan attempts
---------
Co-authored-by: Keegan George <kgeorge13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
* UX: Improve rough edges of AI usage page
* Ensure all text uses I18n
* Change from <button> usage to <DButton>
* Use <AdminConfigAreaCard> in place of custom card styles
* Format numbers nicely using our number format helper,
show full values on hover using title attr
* Ensure 0 is always shown for counters, instead of being blank
* FEATURE: Load usage data after page load
Use ConditionalLoadingSpinner to hide load of usage
data, this prevents us hanging on page load with a white
screen.
* UX: Split users table, and add empty placeholders and page subheader
* DEV: Test fix
* FEATURE: first class support for OpenRouter
This new implementation supports picking quantization and provider pref
Also:
- Improve logging for summary generation
- Improve error message when contacting LLMs fails
* Better support for full screen artifacts on iPad
Support back button to close full screen
Previously, when clicking add footnote on an explain suggestion it would replace the selected word by finding the first occurrence of the word. This results in issues when there are more than one occurrences of a word in a post. This is not trivial to solve, so this PR instead prevents incorrect text replacements by only allowing the replacement if it's unique. We use the same logic here that we use to determine if something can be fast edited.
In this PR we also update tests for post helper explain suggestions. For a while, we haven't had tests here due to streaming/timing issues, we've been skipping our system specs. In this PR, we add acceptance tests to handle this which gives us improved ability to publish message bus updates in the testing environment so that it can be better tested without issues.
This PR fixes an issue where the tag suggester for edit title topic area was suggesting tags that are already assigned on a post. It also updates the amount of suggested tags to 7 so that there is still a decent amount of tags suggested when tags are already assigned.
Add support for versioned artifacts with improved diff handling
* Add versioned artifacts support allowing artifacts to be updated and tracked
- New `ai_artifact_versions` table to store version history
- Support for updating artifacts through a new `UpdateArtifact` tool
- Add version-aware artifact rendering in posts
- Include change descriptions for version tracking
* Enhance artifact rendering and security
- Add support for module-type scripts and external JS dependencies
- Expand CSP to allow trusted CDN sources (unpkg, cdnjs, jsdelivr, googleapis)
- Improve JavaScript handling in artifacts
* Implement robust diff handling system (this is dormant but ready to use once LLMs catch up)
- Add new DiffUtils module for applying changes to artifacts
- Support for unified diff format with multiple hunks
- Intelligent handling of whitespace and line endings
- Comprehensive error handling for diff operations
* Update routes and UI components
- Add versioned artifact routes
- Update markdown processing for versioned artifacts
Also
- Tweaks summary prompt
- Improves upload support in custom tool to also provide urls
In the tag suggester menu we use `DButton` as a wrapper element and use the `discourseTag` helper to render the text inside the element. So visually there is text content inside the button. However, since `DButton` assumes that no `label`/`translatedLabel` inside an element means `.no-text` CSS style should be applied to the button's element, it was resulting in some incorrect styling being applied to this menu. This PR resolves that by programmatically adding the tag as a `translatedLabel` and then visually hiding it with CSS.
- Added a new admin interface to track AI usage metrics, including tokens, features, and models.
- Introduced a new route `/admin/plugins/discourse-ai/ai-usage` and supporting API endpoint in `AiUsageController`.
- Implemented `AiUsageSerializer` for structuring AI usage data.
- Integrated CSS stylings for charts and tables under `stylesheets/modules/llms/common/usage.scss`.
- Enhanced backend with `AiApiAuditLog` model changes: added `cached_tokens` column (implemented with OpenAI for now) with relevant DB migration and indexing.
- Created `Report` module for efficient aggregation and filtering of AI usage metrics.
- Updated AI Bot title generation logic to log correctly to user vs bot
- Extended test coverage for the new tracking features, ensuring data consistency and access controls.
This commit applies further admin UI guidelines, now that they have been more
fleshed out in core, to the AI admin UI:
* Tools
* LLMs
* Personas
The changes include but are not limited to:
* Applying the table CSS classes, for desktop and mobile
* Adding a description and learn more link for each tab
* Adding an empty list placeholder with CTA using `AdminConfigAreaEmptyList`
* Replacing custom headings with `AdminPageSubheader`
* FEATURE: Make emotion /filter ordering match the dashboard table
This change makes the /filter endpoint use the same criteria we use
in the dashboard table for emotion, so it is not confusing for users.
It means that only posts made in the period with the emotion shall be
shown in the /filter, and the order is simply a count of posts that
match the emotion in the period.
It also uses a trick to extract the filter period, and apply it to
the CTE clause that calculates post emotion count on the period, making
it a bit more efficient. Downside is that /filter filters are evaluated
from left to right, so it will only get the speed-up if the emotion
order is last. As we do this on the dashboard table, it should cover
most uses of the ordering, kicking the need for materialized views
down the road.
* Remove zero score in filter
* add table tooltip
* lint
