* FIX/REFACTOR: FoldContent revamp
We hit a snag with our hot topic gist strategy: the regex we used to split the content didn't work, so we cannot send the original post separately. This was important for letting the model focus on what's new in the topic.
The algorithm doesn’t give us full control over how prompts are written, and figuring out how to format the content isn't straightforward. This means we're having to use more complicated workarounds, like regex.
To tackle this, I'm suggesting we simplify the approach a bit. Let's focus on summarizing as much as we can upfront, then gradually add new content until there's nothing left to summarize.
Also, the "extend" part is mostly for models with small context windows, which shouldn't pose a problem 99% of the time with the content volume we're dealing with.
* Fix fold docs
* Use #shift instead of #pop to get the first elem, not the last
When navigating between topic we were not correctly resetting
internal state for summarization. This leads to a situation where
incorrect summaries can be displayed to users and wrong summaries
can be displayed.
Additionally our controller for grabbing summaries was always
streaming results via message bus, which could be delayed when
sidekiq is overloaded. We now will return the cached summary
right away if it is available direct from REST endpoint.
This allows summary to use the new LLM models and migrates of API key based model selection
Claude 3.5 etc... all work now.
---------
Co-authored-by: Roman Rizzi <rizziromanalejandro@gmail.com>
* DEV: Remove the summarization feature
Instead, we'll register summarization implementations for OpenAI, Anthropic, and Discourse AI using the API defined in discourse/discourse#21813.
Core and chat will implement features on top of these implementations instead of this plugin extending them.
* Register instances that contain the model, requiring less site settings
* FEATURE: Topic summarization
Summarize topics using the TopicView's "summary" filter. The UI is similar to what we do for chat, but we don't allow the user to select a timeframe.
Co-authored-by: Rafael dos Santos Silva <xfalcox@gmail.com>