`allow_accepted_answer` should be `allow_accepted_answers` (with an `s` at the end) in the `TopicAnswerMixin`.
The `enable_solved_tags` setting description seemed to be using the description intended for `allow_solved_on_all_topics`. Both descriptions have been updated.
This PR adds a site setting called `enable_solved_tags`. Solved will be enabled for topics containing these tags, just like we do for specific categories.
* Make it possible to disallow topic starters to accept a solution
* Make adding QAPage schema markup optional
* Address @eviltrout's comments
Co-authored-by: Richard <richard@communiteq.com>
* FEATURE: Publish WebHook event when solving/unsolving
This feature will publish a post edit webhook event whenever a solution
is accepted or unaccepted.
I went ahead and used the existing post-edit webhook because all the
post custom fields for the solved plugin are already included in the
post-edit serializer.
* Create Solved Event Webhook
This commit adds a solved event webhook that will only trigger when an
answer has been marked as accepted or unaccepted.
It uses 100 as the webhook ID. This way any new webhooks in core can
keep using lower numbers like 11, 12, 13, but plugins can use 101, 102,
etc.
* Removed functionality that was added to core
This [PR][1] to discourse core adds what what removed in this commit.
It is better to have this logic in core so that it is discoverable and
future webhooks won't end up accidentally using the same ID.
[1]: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/9110
* UX: Add "solved" status filter in advanced search page.
And rename `in:solved` to `status:solved`.
* FEATURE: Publish WebHook event when solving/unsolving
This feature will publish a post edit webhook event whenever a solution
is accepted or unaccepted.
I went ahead and used the existing post-edit webhook because all the
post custom fields for the solved plugin are already included in the
post-edit serializer.
* Create Solved Event Webhook
This commit adds a solved event webhook that will only trigger when an
answer has been marked as accepted or unaccepted.
It uses 100 as the webhook ID. This way any new webhooks in core can
keep using lower numbers like 11, 12, 13, but plugins can use 101, 102,
etc.
* Removed functionality that was added to core
This [PR][1] to discourse core adds what what removed in this commit.
It is better to have this logic in core so that it is discoverable and
future webhooks won't end up accidentally using the same ID.
[1]: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/9110
Co-authored-by: Vinoth Kannan <vinothkannan@vinkas.com>