discourse/lib/post_revisor.rb

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

766 lines
22 KiB
Ruby
Raw Normal View History

# frozen_string_literal: true
require "edit_rate_limiter"
require "post_locker"
2013-12-11 21:41:34 -05:00
class PostRevisor
# Helps us track changes to a topic.
#
# It's passed to `track_topic_fields` callbacks so they can record if they
# changed a value or not. This is needed for things like custom fields.
class TopicChanges
attr_reader :topic, :user
def initialize(topic, user)
@topic = topic
@user = user
@changed = {}
@errored = false
end
def errored?
@errored
end
def guardian
@guardian ||= Guardian.new(@user)
end
def record_change(field_name, previous_val, new_val)
return if previous_val == new_val
diff[field_name] = [previous_val, new_val]
end
def check_result(res)
@errored = true if !res
end
def diff
@diff ||= {}
end
end
POST_TRACKED_FIELDS = %w[raw cooked edit_reason user_id wiki post_type]
attr_reader :category_changed, :post_revision
def initialize(post, topic = post.topic)
@post = post
@topic = topic
# Make sure we have only one Topic instance
post.topic = topic
end
def self.tracked_topic_fields
@@tracked_topic_fields ||= {}
@@tracked_topic_fields
end
def self.track_topic_field(field, &block)
tracked_topic_fields[field] = block
# Define it in the serializer unless it already has been defined
if PostRevisionSerializer.instance_methods(false).exclude?("#{field}_changes".to_sym)
PostRevisionSerializer.add_compared_field(field)
end
end
def self.track_and_revise(topic_changes, field, attribute)
topic_changes.record_change(field, topic_changes.topic.public_send(field), attribute)
topic_changes.topic.public_send("#{field}=", attribute)
end
track_topic_field(:title) do |topic_changes, attribute|
track_and_revise topic_changes, :title, attribute
end
track_topic_field(:archetype) do |topic_changes, attribute|
track_and_revise topic_changes, :archetype, attribute
end
track_topic_field(:category_id) do |tc, new_category_id, fields|
current_category = tc.topic.category
new_category =
(new_category_id.nil? || new_category_id.zero?) ? nil : Category.find(new_category_id)
if new_category.nil? && tc.topic.private_message?
tc.record_change("category_id", current_category.id, nil)
tc.topic.category_id = nil
elsif new_category.nil? || tc.guardian.can_move_topic_to_category?(new_category_id)
tags = fields[:tags] || tc.topic.tags.map(&:name)
if new_category &&
FIX: Miscellaneous tagging errors (#21490) * FIX: Displaying the wrong number of minimum tags in the composer When the minimum number of tags set for the category is larger than the minimum number of tags set in the category tag-groups, the composer was displaying the wrong value. This commit fixes the value displayed in the composer to show the max value between the required for the category and the tag-groups set for the category. This bug was reported on Meta in https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-from-multiple-tag-groups-required-only-suggest-select-at-least-one-tag/263817 * FIX: Limiting tags in categories not working as expected When a category was restricted to a tag group A, which was set to only allow one tag from the group per topic, selecting a tag belonging only to A returned other tags from A that also belonged to other group/s (if any). Example: Tag group A: alpha, beta, gamma, epsilon, delta Tag group B: alpha, beta, gamma Both tag groups set to only allow one tag from the group per topic. If Category 1 was set to only allow tags from the tag group A, and the first tag selected was epsilon, then, because they also belonged to tag group B, the tags alpha, beta, and gamma were still returned as valid options when they should not be. This commit ensures that once a tag from a tag group that restricts its tags to one per topic is selected, no other tag from this group is returned. This bug was reported on Meta in https://meta.discourse.org/t/limiting-tags-to-categories-not-working-as-expected/263143. * FIX: Moving topics does not prompt to add required tag for new category When a topic moved from a category to another, the tag requirements of the new category were not being checked. This allowed a topic to be created and moved to a category: - that limited the tags to a tag group, with the topic containing tags not allowed. - that required N tags from a tag group, with the topic not containing the required tags. This bug was reported on Meta in https://meta.discourse.org/t/moving-tagged-topics-does-not-prompt-to-add-required-tag-for-new-category/264138. * FIX: Editing topics with tag groups from parents allows incorrect tagging When there was a combination between parent tags defined in a tag group set to allow only one tag from the group per topic, and other tag groups relying on this restriction to combine the children tag types with the parent tag, editing a topic could allow the user to insert an invalid combination of these tags. Example: Automakers tag group: landhover, toyota - group set to limit one tag from the group per topic Toyota models group: land-cruiser, hilux, corolla Landhover models group: evoque, defender, discovery If a topic was initially set up with the tags toyota, land-cruiser it was possible to edit it by removing the tag toyota and adding the tag landhover and other landhover model tags like evoque for example. In this case, the topic would end up with the tags toyota, land-cruiser, landhover, evoque because Discourse will automatically insert the missing parent tag toyota when it detects the tag land-cruiser. This combination of tags would violate the restriction specified in the Automakers tag group resulting in an invalid combination of tags. This commit enforces that the "one tag from the group per topic" restriction is verified before updating the topic tags and also make sure the verification checks the compatibility of parent tags that would be automatically inserted. After the changes, the user will receive an error similar to: The tags land-cruiser, landhover cannot be used simultaneously. Please include only one of them.
2023-05-15 16:19:41 -04:00
!DiscourseTagging.validate_category_tags(tc.guardian, tc.topic, new_category, tags)
tc.check_result(false)
next
end
tc.record_change("category_id", current_category&.id, new_category&.id)
tc.check_result(tc.topic.change_category_to_id(new_category_id))
create_small_action_for_category_change(
topic: tc.topic,
user: tc.user,
old_category: current_category,
new_category: new_category,
)
end
end
track_topic_field(:tags) do |tc, tags|
if tc.guardian.can_tag_topics?
prev_tags = tc.topic.tags.map(&:name)
next if tags.blank? && prev_tags.blank?
if !DiscourseTagging.tag_topic_by_names(tc.topic, tc.guardian, tags)
tc.check_result(false)
next
end
2019-03-12 13:09:34 -04:00
if prev_tags.sort != tags.sort
tc.record_change("tags", prev_tags, tags)
DB.after_commit do
post = tc.topic.ordered_posts.first
notified_user_ids = [post.user_id, post.last_editor_id].uniq
added_tags = tags - prev_tags
removed_tags = prev_tags - tags
if !SiteSetting.disable_tags_edit_notifications
Jobs.enqueue(
:notify_tag_change,
post_id: post.id,
notified_user_ids: notified_user_ids,
diff_tags: (added_tags | removed_tags),
)
end
create_small_action_for_tag_changes(
topic: tc.topic,
user: tc.user,
added_tags: added_tags,
removed_tags: removed_tags,
)
2019-03-12 13:09:34 -04:00
end
end
end
end
track_topic_field(:featured_link) do |topic_changes, featured_link|
if !SiteSetting.topic_featured_link_enabled ||
!topic_changes.guardian.can_edit_featured_link?(topic_changes.topic.category_id)
topic_changes.check_result(false)
else
topic_changes.record_change("featured_link", topic_changes.topic.featured_link, featured_link)
topic_changes.topic.featured_link = featured_link
end
end
def self.create_small_action_for_category_change(topic:, user:, old_category:, new_category:)
if !old_category || !new_category || !SiteSetting.create_post_for_category_and_tag_changes ||
SiteSetting.whispers_allowed_groups.blank?
return
end
topic.add_moderator_post(
user,
I18n.t(
"topic_category_changed",
from: "##{old_category.slug_ref}",
to: "##{new_category.slug_ref}",
),
post_type: Post.types[:whisper],
action_code: "category_changed",
)
end
def self.create_small_action_for_tag_changes(topic:, user:, added_tags:, removed_tags:)
if !SiteSetting.create_post_for_category_and_tag_changes ||
SiteSetting.whispers_allowed_groups.blank?
return
end
topic.add_moderator_post(
user,
tags_changed_raw(added: added_tags, removed: removed_tags),
post_type: Post.types[:whisper],
action_code: "tags_changed",
custom_fields: {
tags_added: added_tags,
tags_removed: removed_tags,
},
)
end
def self.tags_changed_raw(added:, removed:)
if removed.present? && added.present?
I18n.t(
"topic_tag_changed.added_and_removed",
added: tag_list_to_raw(added),
removed: tag_list_to_raw(removed),
)
elsif added.present?
I18n.t("topic_tag_changed.added", added: tag_list_to_raw(added))
elsif removed.present?
I18n.t("topic_tag_changed.removed", removed: tag_list_to_raw(removed))
end
end
def self.tag_list_to_raw(tag_list)
tag_list.sort.map { |tag_name| "##{tag_name}" }.join(", ")
end
# AVAILABLE OPTIONS:
# - revised_at: changes the date of the revision
# - force_new_version: bypass grace period edit window
# - bypass_rate_limiter:
# - bypass_bump: do not bump the topic, even if last post
# - skip_validations: ask ActiveRecord to skip validations
# - skip_revision: do not create a new PostRevision record
# - skip_staff_log: skip creating an entry in the staff action log
def revise!(editor, fields, opts = {})
@editor = editor
@fields = fields.with_indifferent_access
@opts = opts
@topic_changes = TopicChanges.new(@topic, editor)
# some normalization
@fields[:raw] = cleanup_whitespaces(@fields[:raw]) if @fields.has_key?(:raw)
@fields[:user_id] = @fields[:user_id].to_i if @fields.has_key?(:user_id)
@fields[:category_id] = @fields[:category_id].to_i if @fields.has_key?(:category_id)
# always reset edit_reason unless provided, do not set to nil else
# previous reasons are lost
@fields.delete(:edit_reason) if @fields[:edit_reason].blank?
Post.plugin_permitted_update_params.each do |field, val|
val[:handler].call(@post, @fields[field]) if @fields.key?(field) && val[:plugin].enabled?
end
if !should_revise?
# the draft sequence is advanced here to handle the edge case where a
# user opens the composer to edit a post and makes some changes (which
# saves a draft), but then un-does the changes and clicks save. In this
# case, should_revise? returns false because nothing has really changed
# in the post, but we want to get rid of the draft so we advance the
# sequence.
advance_draft_sequence if !opts[:keep_existing_draft]
return false
end
@post.acting_user = @editor
@topic.acting_user = @editor
@revised_at = @opts[:revised_at] || Time.now
@last_version_at = @post.last_version_at || Time.now
if guardian.affected_by_slow_mode?(@topic) && !grace_period_edit? &&
SiteSetting.slow_mode_prevents_editing
@post.errors.add(:base, I18n.t("cannot_edit_on_slow_mode"))
return false
end
@version_changed = false
@post_successfully_saved = true
@validate_post = true
@validate_post = @opts[:validate_post] if @opts.has_key?(:validate_post)
@validate_post = !@opts[:skip_validations] if @opts.has_key?(:skip_validations)
@validate_topic = true
@validate_topic = @opts[:validate_topic] if @opts.has_key?(:validate_topic)
@validate_topic = !@opts[:skip_validations] if @opts.has_key?(:skip_validations)
2014-11-17 10:06:43 -05:00
@skip_revision = false
@skip_revision = @opts[:skip_revision] if @opts.has_key?(:skip_revision)
@post.incoming_email&.update(imap_sync: true) if @post.incoming_email&.imap_uid
old_raw = @post.raw
Post.transaction do
revise_post
yield if block_given?
# TODO: these callbacks are being called in a transaction
# it is kind of odd, because the callback is called "before_edit"
# but the post is already edited at this point
# Trouble is that much of the logic of should I edit? is deeper
# down so yanking this in front of the transaction will lead to
# false positive.
plugin_callbacks
revise_topic
advance_draft_sequence if !opts[:keep_existing_draft]
end
# bail out if the post or topic failed to save
return false if !successfully_saved_post_and_topic
# Lock the post by default if the appropriate setting is true
if (
SiteSetting.staff_edit_locks_post? && !@post.wiki? && @fields.has_key?("raw") &&
@editor.staff? && @editor != Discourse.system_user && !@post.user&.staff?
)
PostLocker.new(@post, @editor).lock
end
# We log staff/group moderator edits to posts
if (
(
@editor.staff? ||
(
@post.is_category_description? &&
guardian.can_edit_category_description?(@post.topic.category)
)
) && @editor.id != @post.user_id && @fields.has_key?("raw") && !@opts[:skip_staff_log]
)
StaffActionLogger.new(@editor).log_post_edit(@post, old_raw: old_raw)
end
# WARNING: do not pull this into the transaction
# it can fire events in sidekiq before the post is done saving
# leading to corrupt state
QuotedPost.extract_from(@post)
TopicLink.extract_from(@post)
Topic.reset_highest(@topic.id)
post_process_post
alert_users
publish_changes
grant_badge
ReviewablePost.queue_for_review_if_possible(@post, @editor) if should_create_new_version?
successfully_saved_post_and_topic
end
def cleanup_whitespaces(raw)
raw.present? ? TextCleaner.normalize_whitespaces(raw).rstrip : ""
end
2013-12-11 21:41:34 -05:00
def should_revise?
post_changed? || topic_changed?
end
def post_changed?
POST_TRACKED_FIELDS.each do |field|
2019-05-06 21:27:05 -04:00
return true if @fields.has_key?(field) && @fields[field] != @post.public_send(field)
end
false
end
def topic_changed?
PostRevisor.tracked_topic_fields.keys.any? { |f| @fields.has_key?(f) }
end
def revise_post
if should_create_new_version?
revise_and_create_new_version
else
unless cached_original_raw
self.original_raw = @post.raw
self.original_cooked = @post.cooked
end
revise
end
end
def should_create_new_version?
return false if @skip_revision
FIX: Allow re-flagging of ninja-edited posts (#21360) What is the problem? Consider the following timeline: 1. OP starts a topic. 2. Troll responds snarkily. 3. Flagger flags the post as “inappropriate”. 4. Admin agrees and hides the post. 5. Troll ninja-edits the post within the grace period, but still snarky. 6. Flagger flags the post as inappropriate again. The current behaviour is that the flagger is met with an error saying the post has been reviewed and can't be flagged again for the same reason. The desired behaviour is after someone has edited a post, it should be flaggable again. Why is this happening? This is related to the ninja-edit feature, where within a set grace period no new revision is created, but a new revision is required to flag the same post for the same reason. So essentially there is a window between the naughty corner cooldown where a flagged post can't be edited, and the ninja-edit grace period, where an edit can be made without a new revision. Posts that are edited within this window can't be re-flagged by the same user. |-----------------|-------------------------------| ^ Flag accepted | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🥷🏻 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | ^ Editing grace period over ^ Naughty corner cooldown over How does this fix it? We already create a new revision when ninja-editing a post with a pending flag. The issue above happens only in the case where the flag is already accepted. This change extends the existing behaviour so that a new revision is created when ninja-editing any flagged post, regardless of the status of the flag. (Deleted flags excluded.) This should also help with posterity, avoiding situations where a successfully flagged post looks innocuous in the history because it was ninja-edited, and vice versa.
2023-05-03 22:22:07 -04:00
edited_by_another_user? || flagged? || !grace_period_edit? || owner_changed? ||
force_new_version? || edit_reason_specified?
end
def edit_reason_specified?
@fields[:edit_reason].present? && @fields[:edit_reason] != @post.edit_reason
end
FIX: Allow re-flagging of ninja-edited posts (#21360) What is the problem? Consider the following timeline: 1. OP starts a topic. 2. Troll responds snarkily. 3. Flagger flags the post as “inappropriate”. 4. Admin agrees and hides the post. 5. Troll ninja-edits the post within the grace period, but still snarky. 6. Flagger flags the post as inappropriate again. The current behaviour is that the flagger is met with an error saying the post has been reviewed and can't be flagged again for the same reason. The desired behaviour is after someone has edited a post, it should be flaggable again. Why is this happening? This is related to the ninja-edit feature, where within a set grace period no new revision is created, but a new revision is required to flag the same post for the same reason. So essentially there is a window between the naughty corner cooldown where a flagged post can't be edited, and the ninja-edit grace period, where an edit can be made without a new revision. Posts that are edited within this window can't be re-flagged by the same user. |-----------------|-------------------------------| ^ Flag accepted | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 🥷🏻 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ | | ^ Editing grace period over ^ Naughty corner cooldown over How does this fix it? We already create a new revision when ninja-editing a post with a pending flag. The issue above happens only in the case where the flag is already accepted. This change extends the existing behaviour so that a new revision is created when ninja-editing any flagged post, regardless of the status of the flag. (Deleted flags excluded.) This should also help with posterity, avoiding situations where a successfully flagged post looks innocuous in the history because it was ninja-edited, and vice versa.
2023-05-03 22:22:07 -04:00
def flagged?
@post.is_flagged?
end
def edited_by_another_user?
@post.last_editor_id != @editor.id
end
def original_raw_key
"original_raw_#{(@last_version_at.to_f * 1000).to_i}#{@post.id}"
end
def original_cooked_key
"original_cooked_#{(@last_version_at.to_f * 1000).to_i}#{@post.id}"
end
def cached_original_raw
@cached_original_raw ||= Discourse.redis.get(original_raw_key)
end
def cached_original_cooked
@cached_original_cooked ||= Discourse.redis.get(original_cooked_key)
end
def original_raw
cached_original_raw || @post.raw
end
def original_raw=(val)
@cached_original_raw = val
Discourse.redis.setex(original_raw_key, SiteSetting.editing_grace_period + 1, val)
end
def original_cooked=(val)
@cached_original_cooked = val
Discourse.redis.setex(original_cooked_key, SiteSetting.editing_grace_period + 1, val)
end
def diff_size(before, after)
@diff_size ||=
begin
ONPDiff.new(before, after).short_diff.sum { |str, type| type == :common ? 0 : str.size }
end
end
def grace_period_edit?
return false if (@revised_at - @last_version_at) > SiteSetting.editing_grace_period.to_i
if new_raw = @fields[:raw]
max_diff = SiteSetting.editing_grace_period_max_diff.to_i
if @editor.staff? || (@editor.trust_level > 1)
max_diff = SiteSetting.editing_grace_period_max_diff_high_trust.to_i
end
if (original_raw.size - new_raw.size).abs > max_diff ||
diff_size(original_raw, new_raw) > max_diff
return false
end
end
true
end
def owner_changed?
@fields.has_key?(:user_id) && @fields[:user_id] != @post.user_id
end
def force_new_version?
2013-11-21 19:52:26 -05:00
@opts[:force_new_version] == true
end
def revise_and_create_new_version
@version_changed = true
@post.version += 1
@post.public_version += 1
@post.last_version_at = @revised_at
revise
perform_edit
bump_topic
end
def revise
update_post
update_topic if topic_changed?
create_or_update_revision
remove_flags_and_unhide_post
end
2024-11-05 17:27:49 -05:00
USER_ACTIONS_TO_REMOVE = [UserAction::REPLY, UserAction::RESPONSE]
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
def update_post
if @fields.has_key?("user_id") && @fields["user_id"] != @post.user_id && @post.user_id != nil
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
prev_owner = User.find(@post.user_id)
new_owner = User.find(@fields["user_id"])
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
UserAction
.where(target_post_id: @post.id)
.where(user_id: prev_owner.id)
.where(action_type: USER_ACTIONS_TO_REMOVE)
.update_all(user_id: new_owner.id)
if @post.post_number == 1
UserAction
.where(target_topic_id: @post.topic_id)
.where(user_id: prev_owner.id)
.where(action_type: UserAction::NEW_TOPIC)
.update_all(user_id: new_owner.id)
end
end
POST_TRACKED_FIELDS.each do |field|
@post.public_send("#{field}=", @fields[field]) if @fields.has_key?(field)
end
@post.edit_reason = @fields[:edit_reason] if should_create_new_version?
@post.last_editor_id = @editor.id
@post.word_count = @fields[:raw].scan(/[[:word:]]+/).size if @fields.has_key?(:raw)
@post.self_edits += 1 if self_edit?
@post.extract_quoted_post_numbers
2014-11-17 10:06:43 -05:00
@post_successfully_saved = @post.save(validate: @validate_post)
@post.link_post_uploads
@post.save_reply_relationships
@editor.increment_post_edits_count if @post_successfully_saved
# post owner changed
if prev_owner && new_owner && prev_owner != new_owner
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
likes =
UserAction
.where(target_post_id: @post.id)
.where(user_id: prev_owner.id)
.where(action_type: UserAction::WAS_LIKED)
.update_all(user_id: new_owner.id)
private_message = @topic.private_message?
prev_owner_user_stat = prev_owner.user_stat
unless private_message
UserStatCountUpdater.decrement!(@post, user_stat: prev_owner_user_stat) if !@post.trashed?
prev_owner_user_stat.likes_received -= likes
end
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
if @post.created_at == prev_owner.user_stat.first_post_created_at
prev_owner_user_stat.update!(
first_post_created_at: prev_owner.posts.order("created_at ASC").first.try(:created_at),
)
end
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
new_owner_user_stat = new_owner.user_stat
unless private_message
UserStatCountUpdater.increment!(@post, user_stat: new_owner_user_stat) if !@post.trashed?
new_owner_user_stat.likes_received += likes
end
new_owner_user_stat.save!
end
end
def self_edit?
@editor == @post.user
end
def remove_flags_and_unhide_post
return if @opts[:deleting_post]
return unless editing_a_flagged_and_hidden_post?
flaggers = []
@post
.post_actions
.where(post_action_type_id: PostActionType.flag_types_without_additional_message.values)
.each do |action|
flaggers << action.user if action.user
action.remove_act!(Discourse.system_user)
end
@post.unhide!
PostActionNotifier.after_post_unhide(@post, flaggers)
end
def editing_a_flagged_and_hidden_post?
self_edit? && @post.hidden &&
@post.hidden_reason_id == Post.hidden_reasons[:flag_threshold_reached]
end
def update_topic
Topic.transaction do
PostRevisor.tracked_topic_fields.each do |f, cb|
if !@topic_changes.errored? && @fields.has_key?(f)
cb.call(@topic_changes, @fields[f], @fields)
end
end
unless @topic_changes.errored?
@topic_changes.check_result(@topic.save(validate: @validate_topic))
end
end
end
def create_or_update_revision
return if @skip_revision
# don't create an empty revision if something failed
return unless successfully_saved_post_and_topic
@version_changed ? create_revision : update_revision
end
def create_revision
modifications = post_changes.merge(@topic_changes.diff)
modifications["raw"][0] = cached_original_raw || modifications["raw"][0] if modifications["raw"]
if modifications["cooked"]
modifications["cooked"][0] = cached_original_cooked || modifications["cooked"][0]
end
@post_revision =
PostRevision.create!(
user_id: @post.last_editor_id,
post_id: @post.id,
number: @post.version,
modifications: modifications,
hidden: only_hidden_tags_changed?,
)
end
def update_revision
return unless revision = PostRevision.find_by(post_id: @post.id, number: @post.version)
revision.user_id = @post.last_editor_id
modifications = post_changes.merge(@topic_changes.diff)
modifications.each_key do |field|
if revision.modifications.has_key?(field)
old_value = revision.modifications[field][0]
new_value = modifications[field][1]
if old_value.to_s != new_value.to_s
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
revision.modifications[field] = [old_value, new_value]
else
revision.modifications.delete(field)
end
else
revision.modifications[field] = modifications[field]
end
end
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
# should probably do this before saving the post!
if revision.modifications.empty?
revision.destroy
@post.last_editor_id =
PostRevision.where(post_id: @post.id).order(number: :desc).pick(:user_id) || @post.user_id
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
@post.version -= 1
@post.public_version -= 1
@post.save(validate: @validate_post)
2015-05-29 14:08:39 -04:00
else
revision.save
end
end
def post_changes
@post.previous_changes.slice(*POST_TRACKED_FIELDS)
end
def topic_diff
@topic_changes.diff
end
def perform_edit
return if bypass_rate_limiter?
EditRateLimiter.new(@editor).performed!
end
def bypass_rate_limiter?
@opts[:bypass_rate_limiter] == true
end
def bump_topic
return if bypass_bump? || !is_last_post?
@topic.update_column(:bumped_at, Time.now)
TopicTrackingState.publish_muted(@topic)
TopicTrackingState.publish_unmuted(@topic)
TopicTrackingState.publish_latest(@topic)
end
def bypass_bump?
!@post_successfully_saved || @topic_changes.errored? || @opts[:bypass_bump] == true ||
@post.whisper? || only_hidden_tags_changed?
end
def only_hidden_tags_changed?
return false if (hidden_tag_names = DiscourseTagging.hidden_tag_names).blank?
modifications = post_changes.merge(@topic_changes.diff)
if modifications.keys.size == 1 && (tags_diff = modifications["tags"]).present?
a, b = tags_diff[0] || [], tags_diff[1] || []
changed_tags = ((a + b) - (a & b)).map(&:presence).compact
return true if (changed_tags - hidden_tag_names).empty?
end
false
end
def is_last_post?
!Post.where(topic_id: @topic.id).where("post_number > ?", @post.post_number).exists?
end
def plugin_callbacks
DiscourseEvent.trigger(:before_edit_post, @post, @fields)
DiscourseEvent.trigger(:validate_post, @post)
end
def revise_topic
return unless @post.is_first_post?
update_topic_excerpt
update_category_description
end
def update_topic_excerpt
@topic.update_excerpt(@post.excerpt_for_topic)
end
def update_category_description
return unless category = Category.find_by(topic_id: @topic.id)
doc = Nokogiri::HTML5.fragment(@post.cooked)
doc.css("img").remove
if html = doc.css("p").first&.inner_html&.strip
new_description = html unless html.starts_with?(Category.post_template[0..50])
category.update_column(:description, new_description)
@category_changed = category
else
@post.errors.add(:base, I18n.t("category.errors.description_incomplete"))
end
end
def advance_draft_sequence
@post.advance_draft_sequence
end
def post_process_post
@post.invalidate_oneboxes = true
@post.trigger_post_process
DiscourseEvent.trigger(:post_edited, @post, self.topic_changed?, self)
end
def alert_users
return if @editor.id == Discourse::SYSTEM_USER_ID
Jobs.enqueue(:post_alert, post_id: @post.id)
end
def publish_changes
options =
if !@topic_changes.diff.empty? && !@topic_changes.errored?
{ reload_topic: true }
else
{}
end
DiscourseEvent.trigger(:before_post_publish_changes, post_changes, @topic_changes, options)
@post.publish_change_to_clients!(:revised, options)
end
def grant_badge
BadgeGranter.queue_badge_grant(Badge::Trigger::PostRevision, post: @post)
end
def successfully_saved_post_and_topic
@post_successfully_saved && !@topic_changes.errored?
end
def guardian
@guardian ||= Guardian.new(@editor)
end
def raw_changed?
@fields.has_key?(:raw) && @fields[:raw] != cached_original_raw && @post_successfully_saved
end
def topic_title_changed?
topic_changed? && @fields.has_key?(:title) && topic_diff.has_key?(:title) &&
!@topic_changes.errored?
end
def reviewable_content_changed?
raw_changed? || topic_title_changed?
end
end