From 612dcb58057177e91f49194342cbe93ac702cadf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Atwood <jatwood@discourse.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:23:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] we can't resize images on desktop, very dangerous

---
 app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/lightbox.scss | 4 ----
 app/assets/stylesheets/desktop/topic-post.scss   | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/lightbox.scss b/app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/lightbox.scss
index 05168514873..d941d33c6da 100644
--- a/app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/lightbox.scss
+++ b/app/assets/stylesheets/common/base/lightbox.scss
@@ -11,10 +11,6 @@
 
 .lightbox-wrapper {
   display: inline-block;
-  a img {
-  width: 100%;
-  height: 100%;
-  }
 }
 
 .meta {
diff --git a/app/assets/stylesheets/desktop/topic-post.scss b/app/assets/stylesheets/desktop/topic-post.scss
index f5e16df5c14..71f9e74ee3a 100644
--- a/app/assets/stylesheets/desktop/topic-post.scss
+++ b/app/assets/stylesheets/desktop/topic-post.scss
@@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ nav.post-controls {
 .embedded-posts {
   h1, h2, h3 {margin: 10px 0;}
   a.mention {background: darken(scale-color-diff(), 10%);}
+  /* this 100% stuff is normally VERY dangerous because we're overriding
+  painstakingly calculated exact image widths, but in expanded replies, we may
+  be below minimum width, and expanded replies are loaded on demand anyway */
   p img {
     width: 100%;
     height: 100%;