Commit Graph

22 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Osama Sayegh 280adda09c
FEATURE: Support designating multiple groups as mods on category (#28655)
Currently, categories support designating only 1 group as a moderation group on the category. This commit removes the one group limitation and makes it possible to designate multiple groups as mods on a category.

Internal topic: t/124648.
2024-09-04 04:38:46 +03:00
Ted Johansson f0a46f8b6f
DEV: Automatically update groups for test users with explicit TL (#25415)
For performance reasons we don't automatically add fabricated users to trust level auto-groups. However, when explicitly passing a trust level to the fabricator, in 99% of cases it means that trust level is relevant for the test, and we need the groups.

This change makes it so that when a trust level is explicitly passed to the fabricator, the auto-groups are refreshed. There's no longer a need to also pass refresh_auto_groups: true, which means clearer tests, fewer mistakes, and less confusion.
2024-01-29 17:52:02 +08:00
Ted Johansson 7e5d2a95ee
DEV: Convert min_trust_level_to_tag_topics to groups (#25273)
We're changing the implementation of trust levels to use groups. Part of this is to have site settings that reference trust levels use groups instead. It converts the min_trust_level_to_tag_topics site setting to tag_topic_allowed_groups.
2024-01-26 13:25:03 +08:00
Ted Johansson 57ea56ee05
DEV: Remove full group refreshes from tests (#25414)
We have all these calls to Group.refresh_automatic_groups! littered throughout the tests. Including tests that are seemingly unrelated to groups. This is because automatic group memberships aren't fabricated when making a vanilla user. There are two places where you'd want to use this:

You have fabricated a user that needs a certain trust level (which is now based on group membership.)
You need the system user to have a certain trust level.
In the first case, we can pass refresh_auto_groups: true to the fabricator instead. This is a more lightweight operation that only considers a single user, instead of all users in all groups.

The second case is no longer a thing after #25400.
2024-01-25 14:28:26 +08:00
Penar Musaraj f2cf5434f3
Revert "DEV: Convert min_trust_level_to_tag_topics to groups (#25258)" (#25262)
This reverts commit c7e3d27624 due to
test failures. This is temporary.
2024-01-15 11:33:47 -05:00
Ted Johansson c7e3d27624
DEV: Convert min_trust_level_to_tag_topics to groups (#25258)
We're changing the implementation of trust levels to use groups. Part of this is to have site settings that reference trust levels use groups instead. It converts the min_trust_level_to_tag_topics site setting to tag_topic_allowed_groups.
2024-01-15 20:59:08 +08:00
Martin Brennan 08d641d932
DEV: Convert review_media_unless_trust_level to group-based setting (#25201)
This commit moves the review_media_unless_trust_level setting
to skip_review_media_groups as part of our move from TL to group
based settings.

c.f. https://meta.discourse.org/t/changes-coming-to-settings-for-giving-access-to-features-from-trust-levels-to-groups/283408
2024-01-11 13:43:01 +10:00
Ted Johansson a5f0935307
DEV: Convert min_trust_level_to_create_tag to groups (#24899)
We're changing the implementation of trust levels to use groups. Part of this is to have site settings that reference trust levels use groups instead. It converts the min_trust_level_to_create_tag  site setting to create_tag_allowed_groups.

This PR maintains backwards compatibility until we can update plugins and themes using this.
2024-01-05 10:19:43 +08:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek 702d0620d7
DEV: Convert min_trust_to_create_topic to groups (#24740)
This change converts the min_trust_to_create_topic site setting to
create_topic_allowed_groups.

See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408

- Hides the old setting
- Adds the new site setting
- Add a deprecation warning
- Updates to use the new setting
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting if the old setting was
changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates tests to account for the new change
- After a couple of months, we will remove the min_trust_to_create_topicsetting entirely.

Internal ref: /t/117248
2023-12-13 14:50:13 +11:00
Sam b09422428d
DEV: update syntax tree to latest (#24623)
update format to latest syntax tree
2023-11-29 16:38:07 +11:00
Blake Erickson 8a45f84277
DEV: Convert approve_new_topics_unless_trust_level to groups (#24504)
* DEV: Convert approve_new_topics_unless_trust_level to groups

This change converts the `approve_new_topics_unless_trust_level` site
setting to `approve_new_topics_unless_allowed_groups`.

See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408

- Hides the old setting
- Adds the new site setting
- Add a deprecation warning
- Updates to use the new setting
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting if the old setting was
  changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates tests to account for the new change

After a couple of months we will remove the
`approve_new_topics_unless_trust_level` setting entirely.

Internal ref: /t/115696

* add missing translation

* Add keyword entry

* Add migration
2023-11-22 10:44:59 -07:00
Blake Erickson 447d9b2105
DEV: Convert approve_unless_trust_level to groups (#24357)
This change converts the `approve_unless_trust_level` site setting to
`approve_unless_allowed_groups`.

See: https://meta.discourse.org/t/283408

- Adds the new site setting
- Adds a deprecation warning
- Updates core to use the new settings.
- Adds a migration to fill in the new setting of the old setting was
  changed
- Adds an entry to the site_setting.keywords section
- Updates many tests to account for the new change

After a couple of months we will remove the `approve_unless_trust_level`
setting entirely.

Internal ref: /t/115696
2023-11-21 11:31:42 -07:00
Daniel Waterworth 6e161d3e75
DEV: Allow fab! without block (#24314)
The most common thing that we do with fab! is:

    fab!(:thing) { Fabricate(:thing) }

This commit adds a shorthand for this which is just simply:

    fab!(:thing)

i.e. If you omit the block, then, by default, you'll get a `Fabricate`d object using the fabricator of the same name.
2023-11-09 16:47:59 -06:00
Ted Johansson f08c6d2756
DEV: Switch over category settings to new table - Part 3 (#20657)
In #20135 we prevented invalid inputs from being accepted in category setting form fields on the front-end. We didn't do anything on the back-end at that time, because we were still discussing which path we wanted to take. Eventually we decided we want to move this to a new CategorySetting model.

This PR moves the require_topic_approval and require_reply_approval from custom fields to the new CategorySetting model.

This PR is nearly identical to #20580, which migrated num_auto_bump_daily, but since these are slightly more sensitive, they are moved after the previous one is verified.
2023-09-12 09:51:49 +08:00
David Taylor cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `spec/*` 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Martin Brennan f5194aadd3
DEV: Remove usages of enable_personal_messages (#18437)
cf. e62e93f83a

This PR also makes it so `bot` (negative ID) and `system` users are always allowed
to send PMs, since the old conditional was just based on `enable_personal_messages`
2022-10-05 10:50:20 +10:00
Loïc Guitaut 3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Phil Pirozhkov 493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
David Taylor 68c74e9b93
FEATURE: Allow multiple required tag groups for a category (#16381)
Previously we only supported a single 'required tag group' for a category. This commit allows admins to specify multiple required tag groups, each with their own minimum tag count.

A new category_required_tag_groups database table replaces the existing columns on the categories table. Data is automatically migrated.
2022-04-06 14:08:06 +01:00
Osama Sayegh e40c4bb7f9
FIX: Validate category tag restrictions before sending new topics to review (#16292)
Tags (and tag groups) can be configured so that they can only be used in specific categories and (optionally) restrict topics in these categories to be able to add/use only these tags. These restrictions work as expected when a topic is created without going through the review queue; however, if the topic has to be reviewed by a moderator then these restrictions currently aren't checked before the topic is sent to the review queue, but they're checked later when a moderator tries to approve the topic. This is because if a user manages to submit a topic that doesn't meet the restrictions, moderators won't be able to approve and it'll be stuck in the review queue.

This PR prevents topics that don't meet the tags requirements from being sent to the review queue and shows the poster an error message that indicates which tags that cannot be used.

Internal ticket: t60562.
2022-03-28 21:25:26 +03:00
David Taylor c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Jarek Radosz 45cc16098d
DEV: Move spec/components to spec/lib (#15987)
Lib specs were inexplicably split into two directories (`lib` and `components`)

This moves them all into `lib`.
2022-02-18 19:41:54 +01:00