Due to the way that rswag expands shared components we were getting this
warning when linting our api docs:
```
Component: "user_response" is never used.
```
This change refactors the `api/users_spec.rb` file so that it uses the
new way of doing things with a separate `user_get_response.json` schema
file rather then the old way of loading a shared response inside of the
swagger_helper.rb file.
The display name can have quotes around it, which does not work
with our current comparison of a from field (in this case Reply-To)
and another header (X-Original-From), because we are not comparing
the two values in the same way. This causes an issue where the
commit here: b88d8c8 will not
work properly; the forwarded email gets the From address instead
of the Reply-To address as intended.
We want to be able to skip plugins from doing any work under
certain conditions, and to be able raise their own errors if
a file being uploaded is completely incompatible with the concept
of the plugin if it is enabled. For example, the UppyChecksum plugin
is happy to skip hashing large files, but the UppyUploadEncrypt
plugin from discourse-encrypt relies on the file being encrypted
to do anything with the upload, so it is considered a blocking
error if the user uploads a file that is too large.
This improves the base functions available in uppy-plugin-base and
extendable-uploader to handle this, as well as introducing a
HUGE_FILE_THRESHOLD_BYTES variable which represents 100MB in bytes,
matching the ExternalUploadManager::DOWNLOAD_LIMIT on the
server side.
discourse-encrypt to take advantage of this new functionality will
follow in https://github.com/discourse/discourse-encrypt/pull/141
If parent element for range does not exists, range calculator should
return empty array. In that case duration calculations will stop because
of:
```
if (_rangeElements(element).length === 2) {
opts.duration = _calculateDuration(element);
}
```
After deleting a category, we should soft-delete the category definition topic instead of hard deleting it. Else it causes issues while doing the user merge action if the source user has an orphan post that belongs to the deleted topic.
This PR is introducing 2 changes.
1. Date popup is displayed on click instead on hover
2. If the range is given then the whole range is always displayed for both startDate and endDate
3. For range, short time is displayed for end if the range is < 24 hours
- do not reduce opacity of disabled buttons if they are loading
- replace ‘|’ by single quotes not double quotes
- always start from index 0
- reduces amount of work by checking row's length
- apply quotefix to fallback
- do not add 1 to caretposition if index is 0
The algorithm will now do the following:
- split selection to retain only first line
- removes possible "* "
- check for first inclusion
- fallback to first row if nothing found
The color_scheme_id needs to be an integer not a string.
This is one of the failing tests that showed this error:
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/runs/3598414971
It showed this error
`POSSIBLE ISSUE W/: /user_themes/0/color_scheme_id`
And this is part of the site.json response:
```
...
"user_themes"=>[{"theme_id"=>149, "name"=>"Cool theme 111", "default"=>false, "color_scheme_id"=>37}]
...
```
We don't actually use the reminder_type for bookmarks anywhere;
we are just storing it. It has no bearing on the UI. It used
to be relevant with the at_desktop bookmark reminders (see
fa572d3a7a)
This commit marks the column as readonly, ignores it, and removes
the index, and it will be dropped in a later PR. Some plugins
are relying on reminder_type partially so some stubs have been
left in place to avoid errors.
This partially reverts commit ddb458343d.
Seeing performance degrade on larger sites so back to drawing board on
this one. Instead of the DISTINCT LEFT JOIN, we switch back to
IN(subquery).
First reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/202482/19
There are two optimizations being applied here:
1. Fetch a user's group ids in a seperate query instead of including it
as a sub-query. When I tried a subquery, the query plan becomes very
inefficient.
1. Join against the `topic_allowed_users` and `topic_allowed_groups`
table instead of doing an IN against a subquery where we UNION the
`topic_id`s from the two tables. From my profiling, this enables PG to
do a backwards index scan on the `index_topics_on_timestamps_private`
index.
This commit fixes a bug where listing all messages was incorrectly
excluding topics if a topic has been archived by a group even if the
user did not belong to the group.
This commit also fixes another bug where dismissing private messages
selectively was subjected to the default limit of 30.
This new column will be used to indicate that a bookmark
is at the topic level. The first post of a topic can be
bookmarked twice after this change -- with for_topic set
to true and with for_topic set to false.
A later PR will use this column for logic to bookmark the
topic, and then topic-level bookmark links will take you
to the last unread post in the topic.
See also 22208836c5
Kris
Blake Erickson
Bianca Nenciu
Penar Musaraj
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Martin Brennan
Krzysztof Kotlarek
Vinoth Kannan
Yasuo Honda
Andrei Prigorshnev
dependabot[bot]
Mark VanLandingham
Gerhard Schlager
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
jbrw
Remi Rampin
Arpit Jalan
andrea
Yasuo Honda