Followup 76c56c8284
The change introduced above made it so the expired
bookmark reminders were cleared when using the bulk
action menu for bookmarks. However this also affected
clearing reminders for bookmarks when sending notifications.
When clearing bookmark reminders after sending notifications,
we take into account the auto delete preference:
* never - The bookmark `reminder_at` date should not be cleared,
and the bookmark is kept.
* clear_reminder - The bookmark `reminder_at` date is cleared and
the bookmark is kept
The `never` option made it so "expired" bookmark reminder show
on the user's bookmark list.
This commit fixes the change from the other commit and only
forces clearing of `reminder_at` if using the bookmark bulk
action service.
Followup to 184ce647ea,
this just implements Bianca's suggestion on the original
PR and catches the NameError, which was not necessary
before as we were not actually resolving any class from
bookmarkable_type.
Prior to this change `registered_bookmarkable` would return `nil` as `type` in `Bookmark.registered_bookmarkable_from_type(type)` would be `ChatMessage` and we registered a `Chat::Message` class.
This commit will now properly rely on each model `polymorphic_class_for(name)` to help us infer the proper type from a a `bookmarkable_type`.
Tests have also been added to ensure that creating/destroying chat message bookmarks is working correctly.
---
Longer explanation
Currently when you save a bookmark in the database, it's associated to another object through a polymorphic relationship, which will is represented by two columns: `bookmarkable_id` and `bookmarkable_type`. The `bookmarkable_id` contains the id of the relationship (a post ID for example) and the `bookmarkable_type` contains the type of the object as a string by default, (`"Post"` for example).
Chat plugin just started namespacing objects, as a result a model named `ChatMessage` is now named `Chat::Message`, to avoid complex and risky migrations we rely on methods provided by rails to alter the `bookmarkable_type` when we save it: we want to still save it as `"ChatMessage"` and not `"Chat::Message"`. And, to retrieve the correct model when we load the bookmark from the database: we want `"ChatMessage"` to load the `Chat::Message` model and not the `ChatMessage`model which doesn't exist anymore.
On top of this the bookmark codepath is allowing plugins to register types and will check against these types, so we alter this code path to be able to do a similar ChatMessage <-> Chat::Message dance and allow to check the type is valid. In the specific case of this commit, we were retrieving a `"ChatMessage"` bookmarkable_type from the DB and looking for it in the registered bookmarkable types which contain `Chat::Message` and not `ChatMessage`.
Similar spirit to e195e6f614,
this moves the Bookmarkable registration to DiscoursePluginRegistry
so plugins which are not enabled do not register additional
bookmarkable classes.
* Remove old bookmark column ignores to follow up b22450c7a8
* Change some group site setting checks to use the _map helper
* Remove old secure_media helper stub for chat
* Change attr_accessor to attr_reader for preloaded_custom_fields to follow up 70af45055a
We have a `cleanup!` class method on bookmarks that deletes
bookmarks X days after their related record (post/topic) are
deleted. This commit changes this method to use the
registered_bookmarkables for this instead, and each bookmarkable
type can delete related bookmarks in their own way.
This commit migrates all bookmarks to be polymorphic (using the
bookmarkable_id and bookmarkable_type) columns. It also deletes
all the old code guarded behind the use_polymorphic_bookmarks setting
and changes that setting to true for all sites and by default for
the sake of plugins.
No data is deleted in the migrations, the old post_id and for_topic
columns for bookmarks will be dropped later on.
This allows the category_id filter for the bookmark
report to work with polymorphic bookmarks. Honestly this
is a little hardcode-y at the moment but until we go and
make this report a lot more flexible with more filters
I don't think it's worth the work to add extra interfaces
to RegisteredBookmarkable and BaseBookmarkable to make
this more flexible. This is enough for now.
A bit of a mixed bag, this addresses several edge areas of bookmarks and makes them compatible with polymorphic bookmarks (hidden behind the `use_polymorphic_bookmarks` site setting). The main ones are:
* ExportUserArchive compatibility
* SyncTopicUserBookmarked job compatibility
* Sending different notifications for the bookmark reminders based on the bookmarkable type
* Import scripts compatibility
* BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler compatibility
This PR also refactors the `register_bookmarkable` API so it accepts a class descended from a `BaseBookmarkable` class instead. This was done because we kept having to add more and more lambdas/properties inline and it was very messy, so a factory pattern is cleaner. The classes can be tested independently as well.
Some later PRs will address some other areas like the discourse narrative bot, advanced search, reports, and the .ics endpoint for bookmarks.
This pull request follows on from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/16308. This one does the following:
* Changes `BookmarkQuery` to allow for querying more than just Post and Topic bookmarkables
* Introduces a `Bookmark.register_bookmarkable` method which requires a model, serializer, fields and preload includes for searching. These registered `Bookmarkable` types are then used when validating new bookmarks, and also when determining which serializer to use for the bookmark list. The `Post` and `Topic` bookmarkables are registered by default.
* Adds new specific types for Post and Topic bookmark serializers along with preloading of associations in `UserBookmarkList`
* Changes to the user bookmark list template to allow for more generic bookmarkable types alongside the Post and Topic ones which need to display in a particular way
All of these changes are gated behind the `use_polymorphic_bookmarks` site setting, apart from the .hbs changes where I have updated the original `UserBookmarkSerializer` with some stub methods.
Following this PR will be several plugin PRs (for assign, chat, encrypt) that will register their own bookmarkable types or otherwise alter the bookmark serializers in their own way, also gated behind `use_polymorphic_bookmarks`.
This commit also removes `BookmarkQuery.preloaded_custom_fields` and the functionality surrounding it. It was added in 0cd502a558 but only used by one plugin (discourse-assign) where it has since been removed, and is now used by no plugins. We don't need it anymore.
This commit introduces a new use_polymorphic_bookmarks site setting
that is default false and hidden, that will be used to help continuous
development of polymorphic bookmarks. This setting **should not** be
enabled anywhere in production yet, it is purely for local development.
This commit uses the setting to enable create/update/delete actions
for polymorphic bookmarks on the server and client side. The bookmark
interactions on topics/posts are all usable. Listing, searching,
sending bookmark reminders, and other edge cases will be handled
in subsequent PRs.
Comprehensive UI tests will be added in the final PR -- we already
have them for regular bookmarks, so it will just be a matter of
changing them to be for polymorphic bookmarks.
As we are gradually moving to having a polymorphic
bookmarkable relationship on the Bookmark table,
we need to make the post_id column nullable to be
able to develop and test the new columns, and
for cutover/migration purposes later as well.
This commit is a redo of2f1ddadff7dd47f824070c8a3f633f00a27aacde
which we reverted because it blew up an internal CI check. I looked
into it, and it happened because the old migration to add the bookmark
columns still existed, and those columns were dropped in a post migrate,
so the two migrations to add the columns were conflicting before
the post migrate was run.
------
This commit only includes the creation of the new columns and index,
and does not add any triggers, backfilling, or new data.
A backfill will be done in the final PR when we switch this over.
Intermediate PRs will look something like this:
Add an experimental site setting for using polymorphic bookmarks,
and make sure in the places where bookmarks are created or updated
we fill in the columns. This setting will be used in subsequent
PRs as well.
Listing and searching bookmarks based on polymorphic associations
Creating post and topic bookmarks using polymorphic associations,
and changing special for_topic logic to just rely on the Topic
bookmarkable_type
Querying bookmark reminders based on polymorphic associations
Make sure various other areas like importers, bookmark guardian,
and others all rely on the associations
Prepare plugins that rely on the Bookmark model to use polymorphic
associations
The final core PR will remove all the setting gates and switch over
to using the polymorphic associations, backfill the bookmarks
table columns, and ignore the old post_id and for_topic colummns.
Then it will just be a matter of dropping the old columns down the
line.
This commit is a redo of e21c640a3c
which we reverted to not include half-done work in a release.
This commit is slightly different though, in that it only includes
the creation of the new columns and index, and does not add any
triggers, backfilling, or new data.
A backfill will be done in the final PR when we switch this over.
Intermediate PRs will look something like this:
1. Add an experimental site setting for using polymorphic bookmarks,
and make sure in the places where bookmarks are created or updated
we fill in the columns. This setting will be used in subsequent
PRs as well.
2. Listing and searching bookmarks based on polymorphic associations
3. Creating post and topic bookmarks using polymorphic associations,
and changing special for_topic logic to just rely on the Topic
bookmarkable_type
4. Querying bookmark reminders based on polymorphic associations
5. Make sure various other areas like importers, bookmark guardian,
and others all rely on the associations
6. Prepare plugins that rely on the Bookmark model to use polymorphic
associations
The final core PR will remove all the setting gates and switch over
to using the polymorphic associations, backfill the bookmarks
table columns, and ignore the old post_id and for_topic colummns.
Then it will just be a matter of dropping the old columns down the
line.
The meaning of reminder_at and reminder_last_sent_at changed after
commit 6d422a8033. A bookmark reminder
will fire only if reminder_last_sent_at is null, but before that it
fired everytime reminder_at was set. This is no longer true because
sometimes reminder_at continues to exist even after a reminder fired.
The user can select what happens with a bookamrk after it expires. New
option allow bookmark's reminder to be kept even after it has expired.
After a bookmark's reminder notification is created, the reminder date
will be highlighted in red until the user resets the reminder date.
User can do that using the new Clear Reminder button from the dropdown.
This is a partial revert of 099b679fc5.
`Bookmark#topic_id` and `Bookmark#reminder_type` was dropped in
b22450c7a8 so we need to continue ignoring
the dropped columns so as to ensure a seamless deploy. Otherwise,
ActiveRecord's schema cache will still contain references to
`Bookmark#topic_id` when the column is dropped in a post migration.
It is too close to release of 2.8 for incomplete
feature shenanigans. Ignores and drops the columns and drops
the trigger/function introduced in
e21c640a3c.
Will pick this feature back up post-release.
We are planning on attaching bookmarks to more and
more other models, so it makes sense to make a polymorphic
relationship to handle this. This commit adds the new
columns and backfills them in the bookmark table, and
makes sure that any new bookmark changes fill in the columns
via DB triggers.
This way we can gradually change the frontend and backend
to use these new columns, and eventually delete the
old post_id and for_topic columns in `bookmarks`.
The rake task deleted here was added back in Feb 2020
when bookmarks were first converted from PostAction
records, it is no longer needed. The ignored columns
were removed in ed83d7573e.
Allows creating a bookmark with the `for_topic` flag introduced in d1d2298a4c set to true. This happens when clicking on the Bookmark button in the topic footer when no other posts are bookmarked. In a later PR, when clicking on these topic-level bookmarks the user will be taken to the last unread post in the topic, not the OP. Only the OP can have a topic level bookmark, and users can also make a post-level bookmark on the OP of the topic.
I had to do some pretty heavy refactors because most of the bookmark code in the JS topics controller was centred around instances of Post JS models, but the topic level bookmark is not centred around a post. Some refactors were just for readability as well.
Also removes some missed reminderType code from the purge in 41e19adb0d
We don't actually use the reminder_type for bookmarks anywhere;
we are just storing it. It has no bearing on the UI. It used
to be relevant with the at_desktop bookmark reminders (see
fa572d3a7a)
This commit marks the column as readonly, ignores it, and removes
the index, and it will be dropped in a later PR. Some plugins
are relying on reminder_type partially so some stubs have been
left in place to avoid errors.
This new column will be used to indicate that a bookmark
is at the topic level. The first post of a topic can be
bookmarked twice after this change -- with for_topic set
to true and with for_topic set to false.
A later PR will use this column for logic to bookmark the
topic, and then topic-level bookmark links will take you
to the last unread post in the topic.
See also 22208836c5
We don't need no stinkin' denormalization! This commit ignores
the topic_id column on bookmarks, to be deleted at a later date.
We don't really need this column and it's better to rely on the
post.topic_id as the canonical topic_id for bookmarks, then we
don't need to remember to update both columns if the bookmarked
post moves to another topic.
When we call Bookmark.cleanup! we want to make sure that
topic_user.bookmarked is updated for topics linked to the
bookmarks that were deleted. Also when PostDestroyer calls
destroy and recover. We have a job for this already --
SyncTopicUserBookmarked -- so we just utilize that.
We introduced a cap on the number of bookmarks the user can add in be145ccf2f. However this has caused unintended side effects; when the `jobs/scheduled/bookmark_reminder_notifications.rb` runs we get this error for users who already had more bookmarks than the limit:
> Job exception: Validation failed: Sorry, you have too many bookmarks, visit #{url}/my/activity/bookmarks to remove some.
This is because the `clear_reminder!` call was triggering a bookmark validation, which raised an error because the user already had to many, holding up other reminders.
This PR also adds `max_bookmarks_per_user` hidden site setting (default 2000). This replaces the BOOKMARK_LIMIT const so we can raise it for certain sites.
Users can now pin bookmarks from their bookmark list. This will anchor the bookmark to the top of the list, and show a pin icon next to it. This also applies in the nav bookmarks panel. If there are multiple pinned bookmarks they sort by last updated order.
When posts or topics are deleted we don't want to immediately delete associated bookmarks, so we have a grace period to recover them and their reminders if the post or topic is un-deleted. This PR adds a task to the Weekly scheduled job to go and delete bookmarks attached to posts or topics deleted > 3 days ago.
I added delete_when_reminder_sent to ignored_columns because it no longer exists and added a shortcut method delete_when_reminder_sent? to the Bookmark model. However I have been seeing some weird errors like:
> Job exception: unknown attribute 'delete_when_reminder_sent' for Bookmark.
So I am very suspicious. I am just renaming the method to auto_delete_when_reminder_sent? to avoid any potential conflicts.
Also found include_bookmark_delete_on_owner_reply? in PostSerializer which is used for nothing; I must have forgotten to delete it before.
For the following conditions, the TopicUser.bookmarked column was not updated correctly:
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the reminder was sent
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the owner of the bookmark replied to the topic
This adds another migration to fix the out-of-sync column and also some refactors to BookmarkManager to allow for more of these delete cases. BookmarkManager is used instead of directly destroying the bookmark in PostCreator and BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler.
This adds an option to "delete on owner reply" to bookmarks. If you select this option in the modal, then reply to the topic the bookmark is in, the bookmark will be deleted on reply.
This PR also changes the checkboxes for these additional bookmark options to an Integer column in the DB with a combobox to select the option you want.
The use cases are:
* Sometimes I will bookmark the topics to read it later. In this case we definitely don’t need to keep the bookmark after I replied to it.
* Sometimes I will read the topic in mobile and I will prefer to reply in PC later. Or I may have to do some research before reply. So I will bookmark it for reply later.
We have a couple of examples of enormous amounts of text being entered in the name column of bookmarks. This is not desirable...it is just meant to be a short note / reminder of why you bookmarked this.
This PR caps the column at 100 characters and truncates existing names in the database to 100 characters.
Martin Brennan
Jan Cernik
Sam
Loïc Guitaut
Joffrey JAFFEUX
David Taylor
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
Bianca Nenciu
Martin Brennan
Arpit Jalan