Commit Graph

359 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Renato Atilio c539f749f1
FEATURE: support for chronologically merging posts into existing topic (#21374)
When a user chooses to move a topic/message to an existing topic/message, they can now opt to merge the posts chronologically (using a checkbox in the UI).
2023-05-25 14:38:34 -04:00
Faizaan Gagan a58c37bdc5
FIX: allow admin to change topic notification level via API (#21581)
* FIX: allow admin to change topic notification level via API

* default to `current_user` if admin changes own level

* check param existence

* simplify condition

* remove rescue

* Update spec/requests/topics_controller_spec.rb

Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>

* added specs for other cases

---------

Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>
2023-05-23 00:47:58 +05:30
Natalie Tay 068a36d354
UX: Improve error message when a topic cannot be moved due to category restrictions (#20900) 2023-03-31 02:18:57 +08:00
Loïc Guitaut a9f2c6db64 SECURITY: Show only visible tags in metadata
Currently, the topic metadata show both public and private
tags whereas only visible ones should be exposed.
2023-02-23 17:22:20 +01:00
Loïc Guitaut f7c57fbc19 DEV: Enable `unless` cops
We discussed the use of `unless` internally and decided to enforce
available rules from rubocop to restrict its most problematic uses.
2023-02-21 10:30:48 +01:00
Ted Johansson 25a226279a
DEV: Replace #pluck_first freedom patch with AR #pick in core (#19893)
The #pluck_first freedom patch, first introduced by @danielwaterworth has served us well, and is used widely throughout both core and plugins. It seems to have been a common enough use case that Rails 6 introduced it's own method #pick with the exact same implementation. This allows us to retire the freedom patch and switch over to the built-in ActiveRecord method.

There is no replacement for #pluck_first!, but a quick search shows we are using this in a very limited capacity, and in some cases incorrectly (by assuming a nil return rather than an exception), which can quite easily be replaced with #pick plus some extra handling.
2023-02-13 12:39:45 +08:00
Bianca Nenciu 8fc11215e1
FIX: Ensure soft-deleted topics can be deleted (#19802)
* FIX: Ensure soft-deleted topics can be deleted

The topic was not found during the deletion process because it was
deleted and `@post.topic` was nil.

* DEV: Use @topic instead of finding the topic every time
2023-01-27 16:15:33 +02:00
Daniel Waterworth 666536cbd1
DEV: Prefer \A and \z over ^ and $ in regexes (#19936) 2023-01-20 12:52:49 -06:00
Selase Krakani 73ec80893d
FEATURE: Extend topic update API scope to allow status updates (#19654)
Allow an API key created with topic:update API scope to make updates to
topic status. This change also introduces an optional category_id scope
param.
2023-01-13 01:21:04 +00:00
David Taylor 5a003715d3
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `app/*` 2023-01-09 14:14:59 +00:00
Rafael dos Santos Silva 9f3760cfd8
FEATURE: Allow category moderators to set auto deletion topic timers (#19383)
Co-authored-by: Penar Musaraj <pmusaraj@gmail.com>
2022-12-08 17:14:43 -03:00
Bianca Nenciu 08ab09c928
FIX: Remove public topic invite functionality (#18488)
This can no longer be used from the user interface and could be used to
generate useless topic invites notifications. This commit adds site 
setting max_topic_invitations_per_minute to prevent invite spam.
2022-10-10 19:21:51 +03:00
Bianca Nenciu a0537816fb
FIX: Destroy all posts when hard deleting topic (#17359)
Hard deleting topics that contained soft deleted posts or small actions
used to create orphan posts because only the first post was hard
deleted. This commit adds an error message if there are still posts left
in the topic that must be hard deleted first or hard deletes all small
actions too immediately (there is no other way of hard deleting a small
action because there is no wrench menu).
2022-08-10 12:11:50 +03:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek 09932738e5
FEATURE: whispers available for groups (#17170)
Before, whispers were only available for staff members.

Config has been changed to allow to configure privileged groups with access to whispers. Post migration was added to move from the old setting into the new one.

I considered having a boolean column `whisperer` on user model similar to `admin/moderator` for performance reason. Finally, I decided to keep looking for groups as queries are only done for current user and didn't notice any N+1 queries.
2022-06-30 10:18:12 +10:00
Martin Brennan fcc2e7ebbf
FEATURE: Promote polymorphic bookmarks to default and migrate (#16729)
This commit migrates all bookmarks to be polymorphic (using the
bookmarkable_id and bookmarkable_type) columns. It also deletes
all the old code guarded behind the use_polymorphic_bookmarks setting
and changes that setting to true for all sites and by default for
the sake of plugins.

No data is deleted in the migrations, the old post_id and for_topic
columns for bookmarks will be dropped later on.
2022-05-23 10:07:15 +10:00
Roman Rizzi 2a96bca7a1
FIX: Correctly handle the print param on topics#show. (#16555)
The controller incorrectly sets print to true when passing `print=false`, which causes the rate limit to perform.
2022-04-25 16:04:13 -03:00
Blake Erickson 61248652cd
DEV: Allow params to be passed on topic redirects (#16218)
* DEV: Allow params to be passed on topic redirects

There are several places where we redirect a url to a standard topic url
like `/t/:slug/:topic_id` but we weren't always passing query parameters
to the new url.

This change allows a few more query params to be included on the
redirect. The new params that are permitted are page, print, and
filter_top_level_replies. Any new params will need to be specified.

This also prevents the odd trailing empty page param that would
sometimes appear on a redirect. `/t/:slug/:id.json?page=`

* rubocop: fix missing space after comma

* fix another page= reference
2022-03-17 19:27:51 -06:00
Sam 43da88db6c
PERF: avoid following links in topic RSS feeds (#16145)
Topic RSS feeds contain many non canonical links such as:

- https://site.com/t/a-b-c/111/1
- https://site.com/t/a-b-c/111/2
- https://site.com/t/a-b-c/111/3
- https://site.com/t/a-b-c/111/4
- https://site.com/t/a-b-c/111/5
- https://site.com/t/a-b-c/111/6

Previously we were not indexing RSS feeds yet still following these
links.


This change means we totally ignore links in the RSS feeds which
avoids expensive work scanning them just to find we should not
include them.
2022-03-09 18:25:20 +11:00
Dan Ungureanu e3b4998efc
DEV: Remove notify user topic from share modal (#16085)
This feature was rarely used, could be used for spamming users and was
impossible to add a context to why the user was notified of a topic. A
simple private messages that includes the link and personalized message
can be used instead.
2022-03-03 09:27:45 +11:00
Blake Erickson df2441ee37
Top level replies (#16087)
* DEV: Show only top level replies

Adds a new query param to the topic view so that we can filter out posts
that aren't top level replies. If a post is a reply to another post
instead of the original topic post we should not include it in the
response if the `filter_top_level_replies` query param is present.

* add rspec test
2022-03-02 13:25:36 -07:00
Osama Sayegh 586d572e05
FIX: Don't advance draft sequence when editing topic title (#16002)
This commit handles the edge case where a draft is lost with no warnings if the user edits the title (or category/tags) of a topic while they're replying.to the same topic. Repro steps are as follows:

1. Start replying to a topic and type enough to get a draft saved.
2. Scroll up to the topic title and click the pencil icon next to the topic title, change the title, category and/or tags, and then save the changes.
3. Reload the page and you'll see that the draft is gone.

This happens because we only allow 1 draft per topic per user and when you edit the title of a topic that you're replying to, from the server perspective it'll look like as if you've submitted your reply so it will advance the draft sequence for the topic and delete the draft.

The fix in this commit makes `PostRevisor` skip advancing the draft sequence when a topic's title is edited using the pencil button next to the title.

Internal ticket: t60854.

Co-authored-by: Robin Ward <robin.ward@gmail.com>
2022-02-23 10:39:54 +03:00
Bianca Nenciu 90c3695ab0
FEATURE: Rename Reset Read bulk action to Defer (#15972)
It is enabled only if defer is enabled in user options too and if the
button shows up in the topic's footer.
2022-02-21 22:45:01 +02:00
Bianca Nenciu ae1d2d957f
FEATURE: Replace share post popup with share modal (#15875)
This uniformizes the topic share modal and the post link popup. It also
introduces a new feature which can notify the user of a post.
2022-02-21 22:14:28 +02:00
Blake Erickson 71f7f7ed49
FEATURE: Add external_id to topics (#15825)
* FEATURE: Add external_id to topics

This commit allows for topics to be created and fetched by an
external_id. These changes are API only for now as there aren't any
front changes.

* add annotations

* add external_id to this spec

* Several PR feedback changes

- Add guardian to find topic
- 403 is returned for not found as well now
- add `include_external_id?`
- external_id is now case insensitive
- added test for posts_controller
- added test for topic creator
- created constant for max length
- check that it redirects to the correct path
- restrain external id in routes file

* remove puts

* fix tests

* only check for external_id in webhook if exists

* Update index to exclude external_id if null

* annotate

* Update app/controllers/topics_controller.rb

We need to check whether the topic is present first before passing it to the guardian.

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
2022-02-08 20:55:32 -07:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek bb01563682
FIX: post mover validation color and message (#15688)
When the record is not saved, we should display a proper message.
One potential reason can be plugins for example discourse-calendar is specifying that only first post can contain event
2022-02-02 16:22:52 +11:00
Jean 8d73730c44
FEATURE: Add setting to disable notifications for topic tags edits (#14794) 2021-11-02 13:53:21 -04:00
Jean 92f4cdd330
FEATURE: bypass topic bump when disable_category_edit_notifications is enabled (#14754) 2021-10-27 17:05:10 -04:00
Bianca Nenciu c4843fc1c1
FEATURE: Allow admins to permanently delete posts and topics (#14406)
Sometimes administrators want to permanently delete posts and topics
from the database. To make sure that this is done for a good reasons,
administrators can do this only after one minute has passed since the
post was deleted or immediately if another administrator does it.
2021-10-13 12:53:23 +03:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan d0595127cc
FIX: Missing excerpt for post small actions in topic timeline. (#14547) 2021-10-12 09:20:35 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 27bad28c53
Partially revert "PERF: Improve query performance all inbox private messages. (#14304)" (#14344)
This partially reverts commit ddb458343d.

Seeing performance degrade on larger sites so back to drawing board on
this one. Instead of the DISTINCT LEFT JOIN, we switch back to
IN(subquery).
2021-09-15 11:32:10 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan ddb458343d
PERF: Improve query performance all inbox private messages. (#14304)
First reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/202482/19

There are two optimizations being applied here:

1. Fetch a user's group ids in a seperate query instead of including it
   as a sub-query. When I tried a subquery, the query plan becomes very
inefficient.

1. Join against the `topic_allowed_users` and `topic_allowed_groups`
   table instead of doing an IN against a subquery where we UNION the
`topic_id`s from the two tables. From my profiling, this enables PG to
do a backwards index scan on the `index_topics_on_timestamps_private`
index.

This commit fixes a bug where listing all messages was incorrectly
excluding topics if a topic has been archived by a group even if the
user did not belong to the group.

This commit also fixes another bug where dismissing private messages
selectively was subjected to the default limit of 30.
2021-09-15 10:29:42 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan bc23dcd30b
FIX: Don't publish PM archive events to acting user. (#14291)
When a user archives a personal message, they are redirected back to the
inbox and will refresh the list of the topics for the given filter.
Publishing an event to the user results in an incorrect incoming message
because the list of topics has already been refreshed.

This does mean that if a user has two tabs opened, the non-active tab
will not receive the incoming message but at this point we do not think
the technical trade-offs are worth it to support this feature. We
basically have to somehow exclude a client from an incoming message
which is not easy to do.

Follow-up to fc1fd1b416
2021-09-10 09:20:50 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan ee8c943326
FIX: Remove dismissed new topics from PM topic tracking state. (#14288)
Follow-up to fc1fd1b416
2021-09-09 12:39:27 +08:00
Martin Brennan 1646856974
FIX: Topic reset_new unscoped causing huge queries (#14158)
Since ad3ec5809f when a user chooses
the Dismiss New... option in the New topic list, we send a request
to topics/reset-new.json with ?tracked=false as the only parameter.

This then uses Topic as the scope for topics to dismiss, with no
other limitations. When we do topic_scope.pluck(:id), it gets the
ID of every single topic in the database (that is not deleted) to
pass to TopicsBulkAction, causing a huge query with severe performance
issues.

This commit changes the default scope to use
`TopicQuery.new(current_user).new_results(limit: false)`
which should only use the topics in the user's New list, which
will be a much smaller list, depending on the user's "new_topic_duration_minutes"
setting.
2021-08-26 11:25:20 +10:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 3f59ccefd7 FIX: Remove limit on dismissing unread and new messages.
Follow-up to 2c046cc670
2021-08-05 14:55:38 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 2c046cc670 FEATURE: Dismiss new and unread for PM inboxes. 2021-08-05 12:56:15 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 2b5625bbf0
FIX: Avoid creating a post revision when topic tags have not changed. (#13881)
Co-authored-by: jmperez127 <jmperez127@gmail.com>
2021-07-29 08:14:25 -04:00
Joffrey JAFFEUX 2654a6685c
DEV: adds support for bannered until (#13417)
ATM it only implements server side of it, as my need is for automation purposes. However it should probably be added in the UI too as it's unexpected to have pinned_until and no bannered_until.
2021-06-24 11:35:36 +02:00
Martin Brennan 6fe78cd542
FIX: Make sure reset-new for tracked is not limited by per_page count (#13395)
When dismissing new topics for the Tracked filter, the dismiss was
limited to 30 topics which is the default per page count for TopicQuery.
This happened even if you specified which topic IDs you were
selectively dismissing. This PR fixes that bug, and also moves
the per_page_count into a DEFAULT_PER_PAGE_COUNT for the TopicQuery
so it can be stubbed in tests.

Also moves the unused stub_const method into the spec helpers
for cases like this; it is much better to handle this in one place
with an ensure. In a follow up PR I will clean up other specs that
do the same thing and make them use stub_const.
2021-06-17 08:20:09 +10:00
Martin Brennan e15c86e8c5
DEV: Topic tracking state improvements (#13218)
I merged this PR in yesterday, finally thinking this was done https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12958 but then a wild performance regression occurred. These are the problem methods:

1aa20bd681/app/serializers/topic_tracking_state_serializer.rb (L13-L21)

Turns out date comparison is super expensive on the backend _as well as_ the frontend.

The fix was to just move the `treat_as_new_topic_start_date` into the SQL query rather than using the slower `UserOption#treat_as_new_topic_start_date` method in ruby. After this change, 1% of the total time is spent with the `created_in_new_period` comparison instead of ~20%.

----

History:

Original PR which had to be reverted **https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12555**. See the description there for what this PR is achieving, plus below.

The issue with the original PR is addressed in 92ef54f402

If you went to the `x unread` link for a tag Chrome would freeze up and possibly crash, or eventually unfreeze after nearly 10 mins. Other routes for unread/new were similarly slow. From profiling the issue was the `sync` function of `topic-tracking-state.js`, which calls down to `isNew` which in turn calls `moment`, a change I had made in the PR above. The time it takes locally with ~1400 topics in the tracking state is 2.3 seconds.

To solve this issue, I have moved these calculations for "created in new period" and "unread not too old" into the tracking state serializer.

When I was looking at the profiler I also noticed this issue which was just compounding the problem. Every time we modify topic tracking state we recalculate the sidebar tracking/everything/tag counts. However this calls `forEachTracked` and `countTags` which can be quite expensive as they go through the whole tracking state (and were also calling the removed moment functions).

I added some logs and this was being called 30 times when navigating to a new /unread route because  `sync` is being called from `build-topic-route` (one for each topic loaded due to pagination). So I just added a debounce here and it makes things even faster.

Finally, I changed topic tracking state to use a Map so our counts of the state keys is faster (Maps have .size whereas objects you have to do Object.keys(obj) which is O(n).)

<!-- NOTE: All pull requests should have tests (rspec in Ruby, qunit in JavaScript). If your code does not include test coverage, please include an explanation of why it was omitted. -->
2021-06-02 09:06:29 +10:00
Osama Sayegh b81b24dea2
Revert "DEV: Topic tracking state improvements (#12958)" (#13209)
This reverts commit 002c676344.

Perf regression, we will redo it.
2021-05-31 17:47:42 +10:00
Martin Brennan 002c676344
DEV: Topic tracking state improvements (#12958)
Original PR which had to be reverted **https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12555**. See the description there for what this PR is achieving, plus below.

The issue with the original PR is addressed in 92ef54f402

If you went to the `x unread` link for a tag Chrome would freeze up and possibly crash, or eventually unfreeze after nearly 10 mins. Other routes for unread/new were similarly slow. From profiling the issue was the `sync` function of `topic-tracking-state.js`, which calls down to `isNew` which in turn calls `moment`, a change I had made in the PR above. The time it takes locally with ~1400 topics in the tracking state is 2.3 seconds.

To solve this issue, I have moved these calculations for "created in new period" and "unread not too old" into the tracking state serializer.

When I was looking at the profiler I also noticed this issue which was just compounding the problem. Every time we modify topic tracking state we recalculate the sidebar tracking/everything/tag counts. However this calls `forEachTracked` and `countTags` which can be quite expensive as they go through the whole tracking state (and were also calling the removed moment functions).

I added some logs and this was being called 30 times when navigating to a new /unread route because  `sync` is being called from `build-topic-route` (one for each topic loaded due to pagination). So I just added a debounce here and it makes things even faster.

Finally, I changed topic tracking state to use a Map so our counts of the state keys is faster (Maps have .size whereas objects you have to do Object.keys(obj) which is O(n).)
2021-05-31 09:22:28 +10:00
Bianca Nenciu c247776c65
FIX: One-by-off error in topic show action (#13183)
The not found condition did not work for topics with chunk_size posts,
because it considered it has two pages, but it only has one.
2021-05-28 11:36:45 +03:00
Martin Brennan 7a79bd7da3
FEATURE: Allow selective dismissal of new and unread topics (#12976)
This PR improves the UI of bulk select so that its context is applied to the Dismiss Unread and Dismiss New buttons. Regular users (not just staff) are now able to use topic bulk selection on the /new and /unread routes to perform these dismiss actions more selectively.

For Dismiss Unread, there is a new count in the text of the button and in the modal when one or more topic is selected with the bulk select checkboxes.

For Dismiss New, there is a count in the button text, and we have added functionality to the server side to accept an array of topic ids to dismiss new for, instead of always having to dismiss all new, the same as the bulk dismiss unread functionality. To clean things up, the `DismissTopics` service has been rolled into the `TopicsBulkAction` service.

We now also show the top Dismiss/Dismiss New button based on whether the bottom one is in the viewport, not just based on the topic count.
2021-05-26 09:38:46 +10:00
Martin Brennan 6d53005e8b
Revert "DEV: Improving topic tracking state code (#12555)" (#12864)
This reverts commit 45df579db0.

This was causing huge browser freezes and crashes.
2021-04-28 11:29:54 +10:00
Martin Brennan 45df579db0
DEV: Improving topic tracking state code (#12555)
The aim of this PR is to improve the topic tracking state JavaScript code and test coverage so further modifications can be made in plugins and in core. This is focused on making topic tracking state changes easier to respond to with callbacks, and changing it so all state modifications go through a single method instead of modifying `this.state` all over the place. I have also tried to improve documentation, make the code clearer and easier to follow, and make it clear what are public and private methods.

The changes I have made here should not break backwards compatibility, though there is no way to tell for sure if other plugin/theme authors are using tracking state methods that are essentially private methods. Any name changes made in the tracking-state.js code have been reflected in core.

----

We now have a `_trackedTopicLimit` in the tracking state. Previously, if a topic was neither new nor unread it was removed from the tracking state; now it is only removed if we are tracking more than `_trackedTopicLimit` topics (which is set to 4000). This is so plugins/themes adding topics with `TopicTrackingState.register_refine_method` can add topics to track that aren't necessarily new or unread, e.g. for totals counts.

Anywhere where we were doing `tracker.states["t" + data.topic_id] = newObject` has now been changed to flow through central `modifyState` and `modifyStateProp` methods. This is so state objects are not modified until they need to be (e.g. sometimes properties are set based on certain conditions) and also so we can run callback functions when the state is modified.

I added `onStateChange` and `onMessageIncrement` methods to register callbacks that are called when the state is changed and when the message count is incremented, respectively. This was done so we no longer need to do things like `@observes("trackingState.states")` in other Ember classes.

I split up giant functions like `sync` and `establishChannels` into smaller functions for readability and testability, and renamed many small functions to _functionName to designate them as private functions which not be called by consumers of `topicTrackingState`. Public functions are now all documented (well...at least ones that are not immediately obvious).

----

On the backend side, I have changed the MessageBus publish events for TopicTrackingState to send back tags and tag IDs for more channels, and done some extra code cleanup and refactoring. Plugins may override `TopicTrackingState.report` so I have made its footprint as small as possible and externalised the main parts of it into other methods.
2021-04-28 09:54:45 +10:00
Dan Ungureanu cfee2728ce
FEATURE: New share topic modal (#12804)
The old share modal used to host both share and invite functionality,
under two tabs. The new "Share Topic" modal can be used only for
sharing, but has a link to the invite modal.

Among the sharing methods, there is also "Notify" which points out
that existing users will simply be notified (this was not clear
before). Staff members can notify as many users as they want, but
regular users are restricted to one at a time, no more than
max_topic_invitations_per_day. The user will not receive another
notification if they have been notified of the same topic in past hour.

The "Create Invite" modal also suffered some changes: the two radio
boxes for selecting the type (invite or email) have been replaced by a
single checkbox (is email?) and then the two labels about emails have
been replaced by a single one, some fields were reordered and the
advanced options toggle was moved to the bottom right of the modal.
2021-04-23 19:18:23 +03:00
jbrw ac7773a30d
FEATURE: allow category group moderators to pin/unpin topics (#12325)
* FEATURE: allow category group moderators to pin/unpin topics

Category group moderators should be able to pin/unpin any topics within a category where they have appropraite category group moderator permissions.
2021-03-09 16:05:11 -05:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek ad3ec5809f
FIX: Dismiss new with better migration (#12062)
Original PR was reverted because of broken migration https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12058

I fixed it by adding this line
```
          AND topics.id IN(SELECT id FROM topics ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT :max_new_topics)
```

This time it is left joining a limited amount of topics. I tested it on few databases and it worked quite smooth
2021-02-15 08:50:33 +11:00
Martin Brennan ff1ac57feb
FIX: Validate duration minutes values for topic timer (#12040)
Add server and client side validations to ensure topic timer durations cannot exceed 2 years and cannot be less than or equal to 0.
2021-02-12 09:05:14 +10:00