For the following conditions, the TopicUser.bookmarked column was not updated correctly:
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the reminder was sent
* When a bookmark was auto-deleted because the owner of the bookmark replied to the topic
This adds another migration to fix the out-of-sync column and also some refactors to BookmarkManager to allow for more of these delete cases. BookmarkManager is used instead of directly destroying the bookmark in PostCreator and BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler.
Because previous migration was already deployed and some databases were already migrated, I needed to add some conditions to the migration.
Previous migration - https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/master/db/post_migrate/20200629232159_rename_path_whitelist_to_allowed_paths.rb
What will happen in a scenario when previous migration was not run.
1. column allowed_paths will be created
2. allowed_path will be populated with data from path_whitelist
3. path_whitelist column will be dropped
What will happen in a scenario when previous migration was already run.
1. column allowed_paths will not be created because already exists - `unless column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :allowed_paths)`
2. Data will not be copied because path_whitelist is missing - `if column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :path_whitelist) && column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :allowed_paths)`
3. path_whitelist column deletion will be skipped - `if column_exists?(:embeddable_hosts, :path_whitelist)`
This adds an option to "delete on owner reply" to bookmarks. If you select this option in the modal, then reply to the topic the bookmark is in, the bookmark will be deleted on reply.
This PR also changes the checkboxes for these additional bookmark options to an Integer column in the DB with a combobox to select the option you want.
The use cases are:
* Sometimes I will bookmark the topics to read it later. In this case we definitely don’t need to keep the bookmark after I replied to it.
* Sometimes I will read the topic in mobile and I will prefer to reply in PC later. Or I may have to do some research before reply. So I will bookmark it for reply later.
* FEATURE: Allow List for PMs
This feature adds a new user setting that is disabled by default that
allows them to specify a list of users that are allowed to send them
private messages. This way they don't have to maintain a large list of
users they don't want to here from and instead just list the people they
know they do want. Staff will still always be able to send messages to
the user.
* Update PR based on feedback
* Remove unneeded bookmark name index.
* Change bookmark search query to use post_search_data. This allows searching on topic title and post content
* Tweak the style/layout of the bookmark list so the search looks better and the whole page fits better on mobile.
* Added scopes UI
* Create scopes when creating a new API key
* Show scopes on the API key show route
* Apply scopes on API requests
* Extend scopes from plugins
* Add missing scopes. A mapping can be associated with multiple controller actions
* Only send scopes if the use global key option is disabled. Use the discourse plugin registry to add new scopes
* Add not null validations and index for api_key_id
* Annotate model
* DEV: Move default mappings to ApiKeyScope
* Remove unused attribute and improve UI for existing keys
* Support multiple parameters separated by a comma
Follow up to https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/10188/files
There are still TopicUser records where bookmarked is true even though there are no Bookmark or PostAction records with the type of bookmark for the associated topic and user. This migration corrects this issue by setting bookmarked to false for these cases.
We have a couple of examples of enormous amounts of text being entered in the name column of bookmarks. This is not desirable...it is just meant to be a short note / reminder of why you bookmarked this.
This PR caps the column at 100 characters and truncates existing names in the database to 100 characters.
* This is causing issues where sometimes bookmarked is out of sync with what is in the Bookmark table. The BookmarkManager handles updating this column now.
* Add migration to fix bookmarked column that is incorrectly marked false when a Bookmark record exists.
A future-dated migration was accidently introduced by me in 45c399f0. This was removed in b9762afc, but other migrations had already been generated based on its incorrect date. This commit removes the offending data in the schema_migrations table, and corrects the version in the published_pages migration.
This commit also adds a check to db:migrate which raises an error when invalid migration timestamps are used.
Badge and user_badge tables were created using add_column index: true
When the migration was written, `index: true` was a no-op for non-reference columns
Since then, rails made it work 9a0d35e820
This migration adds the index to very old sites, so that we have a consistent state
This is a no-op for modern installations. It only affects older sites.
Follow-up to f7d676dce1
This needs to be done in a transaction, because we need to drop and recreate the badge_posts view.
This migration was added to master temporarily, then removed. This resulted in some sites being in an inconsistent state. Adding the migration back for now. If we decide the column is unneeded, then we should add a second migration to remove the column.
This reverts part of commit e1af91f5ae.
This reverts commit 20780a1eee.
* SECURITY: re-adds accidentally reverted commit:
03d26cd6: ensure embed_url contains valid http(s) uri
* when the merge commit e62a85cf was reverted, git chose the 2660c2e2 parent to land on
instead of the 03d26cd6 parent (which contains security fixes)
* FIX: Emit web hooks for flags
* FEATURE: Remove 'flag' web hook in favor of 'reviewable' web hook
* FEATURE: Remove 'queued post' web hook in favor of 'reviewable' web hook
* FIX: Do not set a default value for web hooks with no events
* the post_actions table has no FK to users, so if a user has been
deleted we may end up with dangling post_action records, which then
interferes with the bookmarks migration because bookmarks DO have
an FK to users
* PERF: Dematerialize topic_reply_count
It's only ever used for trust level promotions that run daily, or compared to 0. We don't need to track it on every post creation.
* UX: Add symbol in TL3 report if topic reply count is capped
* DEV: Drop user_stats.topic_reply_count column
It was using ActiveRecord which broke migrating a new site. The groups
table now has a unique constraint on group name so this migration from
2014 should not be necessary anymore.
Previously we only changed sequence on ownership change, this
cause a race condition between tabs where user could type for a
long time without being warned of an out of date draft.
This change is a radical change and we should watch closely.
Code was already in place to track sequence on the client so no
changes are needed there.