Usage:
```
@validation="integer"
```
This commit also adds a default for rules. By default a rule will now be `ruleName: {}`, this avoids all the boilerplate in validation-parser.js.
We'd implemented the deprecation by overriding `get parentView`, and storing the real value on `_parentView`. Unfortunately that meant people could access `_parentView` directly, thereby bypassing the deprecation message.
This commit moves the internal storage to a private field, which cannot be accessed from outside the class. A deprecated getter for `_parentView` is introduced to avoid immediate breakage for any code using this workaround.
This is a convenience for when you have multiple properties to set in form kit.
```
// before
set("foo", 1);
set("bar", 2);
//after
setProperties({foo: 1, bar: 2});
```
Before migration is run flags code is evaluated. It is causing error:
```
NoMethodError: undefined method `require_message' for an instance of Flag (NoMethodError)
Did you mean? require_dependency
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activemodel-7.1.3.4/lib/active_model/attribute_methods.rb:489:in `method_missing'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.1.3.4/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb💯in `each'
/var/www/discourse/vendor/bundle/ruby/3.3.0/gems/activerecord-7.1.3.4/lib/active_record/relation/delegation.rb💯in `each'
/var/www/discourse/app/models/post_action_type.rb:64:in `reject'
```
The solution is to temporarily fall back to old column name - custom_type
Our old group SMTP SSL option was a checkbox,
but this was not ideal because there are actually
3 different ways SSL can be used when sending
SMTP:
* None
* SSL/TLS
* STARTTLS
We got around this before with specific overrides
for Gmail, but it's not flexible enough and now people
want to use other providers. It's best to be clear,
though it is a technical detail. We provide a way
to test the SMTP settings before saving them so there
should be little chance of messing this up.
This commit also converts GroupEmailSettings to a glimmer
component.
Allow admin to create custom flag which requires an additional message.
I decided to rename the old `custom_flag` into `require_message` as it is more descriptive.
- removes unused css code
- improves password control sizing
- adds more spacing between collection items
- correct a typo in collection class
---------
Co-authored-by: chapoi <101828855+chapoi@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR introduces FormKit, a component-based form library designed to simplify form creation and management. This library provides a single `Form` component, various field components, controls, validation mechanisms, and customization options. Additionally, it includes helpers to facilitate testing and writing specifications for forms.
1. **Form Component**:
- The main component that encapsulates form logic and structure.
- Yields various utilities like `Field`, `Submit`, `Alert`, etc.
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
import Form from "discourse/form";
<template>
<Form as |form|>
<form.Field
@name="username"
@title="Username"
@validation="required"
as |field|
>
<field.Input />
</form.Field>
<form.Field @name="age" @title="Age" as |field|>
<field.Input @type="number" />
</form.Field>
<form.Submit />
</Form>
</template>
```
2. **Validation**:
- Built-in validation rules such as `required`, `number`, `length`, and `url`.
- Custom validation callbacks for more complex validation logic.
**Example Usage**:
```javascript
validateUsername(name, value, data, { addError }) {
if (data.bar / 2 === value) {
addError(name, "That's not how maths work.");
}
}
```
```hbs
<form.Field @name="username" @validate={{this.validateUsername}} />
```
3. **Customization**:
- Plugin outlets for extending form functionality.
- Styling capabilities through propagated attributes.
- Custom controls with properties provided by `form` and `field`.
**Example Usage**:
```hbs
<Form class="my-form" as |form|>
<form.Field class="my-field" as |field|>
<MyCustomControl id={{field.id}} @onChange={{field.set}} />
</form.Field>
</Form>
```
4. **Helpers for Testing**:
- Test assertions for form and field validation.
**Example usage**:
```javascript
assert.form().hasErrors("the form shows errors");
assert.form().field("foo").hasValue("bar", "user has set the value");
```
- Helper for interacting with he form
**Example usage**:
```javascript
await formKit().field("foo").fillIn("bar");
```
5. **Page Object for System Specs**:
- Page objects for interacting with forms in system specs.
- Methods for submitting forms, checking alerts, and interacting with fields.
**Example Usage**:
```ruby
form = PageObjects::Components::FormKit.new(".my-form")
form.submit
expect(form).to have_an_alert("message")
```
**Field Interactions**:
```ruby
field = form.field("foo")
expect(field).to have_value("bar")
field.fill_in("bar")
```
6. **Collections handling**:
- A specific component to handle array of objects
**Example Usage**:
```gjs
<Form @data={{hash foo=(array (hash bar=1) (hash bar=2))}} as |form|>
<form.Collection @name="foo" as |collection|>
<collection.Field @name="bar" @title="Bar" as |field|>
<field.Input />
</collection.Field>
</form.Collection>
</Form>
```
Previously, we did not log any topic slow mode changes. This allowed
some malicious (or just careless) TL4 users to delete slow modes created
by moderators at will. Administrators could not see who changed the slow
mode unless they had SQL knowledge and used Data Explorer.
This commit enables logging who turns slow mode on, off, or changes it.
Related meta topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-is-there-no-record-of-who-added-or-removed-slow-mode/316354
Followup 7b627dc14b
In this other commit, I changed the email settings validator
to always use the `login` authentication method for
office365 and outlook, but I didn't change the actual
group SMTP mailer to do this.
This commit fixes that issue and does some minor refactoring.
Originally in 964da21817
we hid the SMTPAuthenticationError message except in
very specific cases. However this message often contains
helpful information from the mail provider, for example
here is a response from Office365:
> 535 5.7.139 Authentication unsuccessful, user is locked by your
organization's security defaults policy. Contact your administrator.
So, we will show the error message in the modal UI instead
of supressing it with a generic message to be more helpful.
The watch words controller creation function, create_or_update_word(), doesn’t validate the size of the replacement parameter, unlike the word parameter, when creating a replace watched word. So anyone with moderator privileges can create watched words with almost unlimited characters.
`after_commit` should be used before refreshing processes to be sure that the database is already updated.
Also, MessageBus is used instead of events as MessageBus works correctly with many processes;
In order to facilitate discourse-tag-icons and discourse-category-icons to render icons for post content, we need to provide an additional slug parameter here
The OutOfDateThemes problem check is using an old method of setting the message, by overriding #message. It should instead use #translation_keys. (By chance I noticed the same thing applies to UnreachableThemes.
This commit updates `StaticController#enter` to not redirect to invalid
paths when the `redirect` param is set. Instead it should redirect to `/` when the
`redirect` param is invalid.
Followup 560e8aff75
GitHub auth tokens cannot be made with permissions to
access multiple organisations. This is quite limiting.
This commit changes the site setting to be a "secret list"
type, which allows for a key/value mapping where the value
is treated like a password in the UI.
Now when a GitHub URL is requested for oneboxing, the
org name from the URL is used to determine which token
to use for the request.
Just in case anyone used the old site setting already,
there is a migration to create a `default` entry
with that token in the new list setting, and for
a period of time we will consider that token valid to
use for all GitHub oneboxes as well.
"Replies" in non-crawler view makes a request when clicked to get all replies, however this does not make sense in the crawler view where we load everything per post number.
So the solution here is to exclude the reply number so we can avoid having to nest all replies in a post.
### What is the problem?
We have recently added a new option to add user fields required for existing users. This is in contrast to requiring fields only on sign-up.
This revealed an existing problem. Consider the following:
1. User A signs up.
2. Admin adds a new user field required on sign-up. (Should not apply to User A since they already signed up.)
3. User A tries to update their profile.
**Expected behaviour:**
No problem.
**Actual behaviour:**
User A receives an error saying they didn't fill up all required fields.
### How does this fix it?
When updating profile, we only check that required fields that are "for all users" are filled. Additionally, we check that fields that were required on sign-up and have previously been filled are not blanked out.
Mark VanLandingham
dependabot[bot]
Natalie Tay
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Ella E.
Neil Lalonde
Sérgio Saquetim
Kris
David Taylor
Krzysztof Kotlarek
Martin Brennan
chapoi
Isaac Janzen
锦心
Vinoth Kannan
Ted Johansson
Kelv
Alan Guo Xiang Tan