Commit Graph

14 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alan Guo Xiang Tan e4b11e7643
FEATURE: Only list watching group messages in messages notifications panel (#20630)
Why is this change required?

Prior to this change, we would list all group messages that a user
has access to in the user menu messages notifications panel dropdown.
However, this did not respect the topic's notification level setting and
group messages which the user has set to 'normal' notification level were
being displayed

What does this commit do?

With this commit, we no longer display all group messages that a user
has access to. Instead, we only display group messages that a user is
watching in the user menu messages notifications panel dropdown.

Internal Ref: /t/94392
2023-03-13 08:09:38 +08:00
David Taylor cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `spec/*` 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Martin Brennan f5194aadd3
DEV: Remove usages of enable_personal_messages (#18437)
cf. e62e93f83a

This PR also makes it so `bot` (negative ID) and `system` users are always allowed
to send PMs, since the old conditional was just based on `enable_personal_messages`
2022-10-05 10:50:20 +10:00
Loïc Guitaut 3eaac56797 DEV: Use proper wording for contexts in specs 2022-08-04 11:05:02 +02:00
Phil Pirozhkov 493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
David Taylor c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 34cebfd867
FIX: Exclude PMs that user sent to themselves. (#14496)
Regression from 016efeadf6

Follow-up to 016efeadf6
2021-10-04 11:55:35 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 9d5da2b383
PERF: Revert all inboxes from messages route. (#14445)
The all inboxes was introduced in
016efeadf6 but we decided to roll it back
for performance reasons. The main performance challenge here is that PG
has to basically loop through all the PMs that a user is allowed to view
before being able to order by `Topic#bumped_at`. The all inboxes was not
planned as part of the new/unread filter so we've decided not to tackle
the performance issue for the upcoming release.

Follow-up to 016efeadf6
2021-09-28 11:58:04 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 7a8b5cdd5c
DEV: Improve tests coverage when listing private messages. (#14385)
This is in response to the security incident published in
https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-vm3x-w6jm-j9vv.

The security incident highlighted a gap in our test suite so we're
adding more test cases to ensure that personal and group messages do not
leak between users in the future.
2021-09-21 10:39:59 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan ddb458343d
PERF: Improve query performance all inbox private messages. (#14304)
First reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/202482/19

There are two optimizations being applied here:

1. Fetch a user's group ids in a seperate query instead of including it
   as a sub-query. When I tried a subquery, the query plan becomes very
inefficient.

1. Join against the `topic_allowed_users` and `topic_allowed_groups`
   table instead of doing an IN against a subquery where we UNION the
`topic_id`s from the two tables. From my profiling, this enables PG to
do a backwards index scan on the `index_topics_on_timestamps_private`
index.

This commit fixes a bug where listing all messages was incorrectly
excluding topics if a topic has been archived by a group even if the
user did not belong to the group.

This commit also fixes another bug where dismissing private messages
selectively was subjected to the default limit of 30.
2021-09-15 10:29:42 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan d13716286c
FIX: Unread group PMs should use `GroupUser#first_unread_pm_at`. (#14075)
This bug was causing unread PMs for groups to appear inaccurate.
2021-08-18 11:23:28 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 0bf27242ec FIX: Group inbox new filter not accounting for dismissed topics.
Follow-up to 2c046cc670
2021-08-05 16:53:12 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 2c046cc670 FEATURE: Dismiss new and unread for PM inboxes. 2021-08-05 12:56:15 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 016efeadf6
FEATURE: New and Unread messages for user personal messages. (#13603)
* FEATURE: New and Unread messages for user personal messages.

Co-authored-by: awesomerobot <kris.aubuchon@discourse.org>
2021-08-02 12:41:41 +08:00