A user editing a post will no longer get composer messages that are
meant for new users posting replies and threads. These messages don't
make sense in an edit context at all -- they're usually discussing
making salient replies or topics, or adding avatars. They make even less
sense when a user is an admin attempting to change the default topics
for the first time.
Since these messages actually do make sense for a user when they have a
low post count, though, they're still going to occur. They just occur
when a user is creating new content (and thus, more likely to read the
notice), not during edits.
This is in response to this issue:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/education-message-for-editing-wiki-topic/66682
When creating lightboxes we will attempt to create 1.5x and 2x thumbnails
for retina screens, this can be controlled with a new hidden site setting
called responsice_post_image_sizes, if you wish to create 3x images run
SiteSetting.responsive_post_image_sizes = "1|1.5|2|3"
The default should be good for most of the setups as it balances filesize
with quality. 3x thumbs can get big.
If we detect redis is in readonly we can not correctly get a mutex
raise an exception to notify caller
When getting optimized images avoid the distributed mutex unless
for some reason it is the first call and we need to generate a thumb
In redis readonly no thumbnails will be generated
previously admin got a free pass and could set theme via cookie to anything
including themes that are not selectable
this refactor ensures that only "preview" gets a free pass, all the rest
goes through the same pipeline
* When an error is raised when checking route constraints, we
can only return true/false which either lets the request
through or return a 404 error. Therefore, we just skip
rate limiting here and let the controller handle the
rate limiting.
If sidekiq is paused or Discourse is in readonly continue to queue
heartbeats
If we do not do that then a master process can end up reaping sidekiq
workers and causing various badness
This also impacts restore which can do weird stuff TM in cases like this
These site settings are very hard to explain and only applicable for very
specific Discourse setups.
If an admin "enables staged users" which is used in support scenarios then
all staff can send "messages" directly to an "email".
The setting allows you to extend this to TL4 or any trust level.
Actual use case would be a support type setup with restricted staff. It is
quite rare so hiding this for now and re-evaluate keeping the setting in
2019
* FIX: don't allow inviting more than `max_allowed_message_recipients` setting allows
* add specs for guardian
* user preferences for auto track shouldn't be applicable to PMs (it auto watches on visit)
Execlude PMs from "Automatically track topics I enter..." and "When I post in a topic, set that topic to..." user preferences
* groups take only 1 slot in PM
* just return if topic is a PM
At the moment core providers are hard-coded in Javascript, and plugin providers get added to the JS payload at compile time. This refactor means that we only ship enabled providers to the client.
* drafts in user profile: only show to user herself (not to admins), use avatar replying to (instead of topic OP), add keyboard shortcut for drafts, simplify display labels
* use JSON when testing Draft.stream
* add drafts.json endpoint, user profile tab with drafts stream
* improve drafts stream display in user profile
* truncate excerpts in drafts list, better handling for resume draft action
* improve draft stream SQL query, add rspec tests
* if composer is open, quietly close it when user opens another draft from drafts stream; load PM draft only when user is in /u/username/messages (instead of /u/username)
* cleanup
* linting fixes
* apply prettier styling to modified files
* add client tests for drafts, includes a fixture for drafts.json
* improvements to code following review
* refresh drafts route when user deletes a draft open in the composer while being in the drafts route; minor prettier scss fix
* added more spec tests, deleted an acceptance test for removing drafts that was too finicky, formatting and code style fixes, added appEvent for draft:destroyed
* prettier, eslint fixes
* use "username_lower" from users table, added error handling for rejected promises
* adds guardian spec for can_see_drafts, adds improvements following code review
* move DraftsController spec to its own file
* fix failing drafts qunit test, use getOwner instead of deprecated this.container
* limit test fixture for draft.json testing to new_topic request only
It was a dropdown to provide choices of color schemes,
and only one scheme could be shown.
With this commit, multiple color scheme previews can be displayed on
one page at the same time, making admins choose color schemes more
easily.
Theme preview windows are shrinked.
Imported default color schemes.
Co-Authored-By: Misaka 0x4e21 <misaka4e21@gmail.com>
* Phase 0 for user-selectable theme components
- Drops `key` column from the `themes` table
- Drops `theme_key` column from the `user_options` table
- Adds `theme_ids` (array of ints default []) column to the `user_options` table and migrates data from `theme_key` to the new column.
- Removes the `default_theme_key` site setting and adds `default_theme_id` instead.
- Replaces `theme_key` cookie with a new one called `theme_ids`
- no longer need Theme.settings_for_client
* Add possibility to add hidden posts with PostCreator
* FEATURE: Create hidden posts for received spam emails
Spamchecker usually have 3 results: HAM, SPAM and PROBABLY_SPAM
SPAM gets usually directly rejected and needs no further handling.
HAM is good message and usually gets passed unmodified.
PROBABLY_SPAM gets an additional header to allow further processing.
This change addes processing capabilities for such headers and marks
new posts created as hidden when received via email.
A previous shortcut used was not allowing for <abbr and other tags starting with a
If <abbr> appeared anywhere in the text all mentions would fail to link
This refinement of previous fix moves the crawler blocking into
anonymous cache
This ensures we never poison the cache incorrectly when blocking crawlers
I know that **Naming is CRITICAL** and that **Refactoring only NOT welcome**.
But since I spotted this (consistent) typo and the change does not affect any
functionality -- I checked the presence of "asscoiated" in the code base, I
guess the first rule trumps the second one.
It also gave me a false pretext to bypass my reluctance to use Google forms and
sign de CLA. Typos hurt the eye.
The logic is too hairy and we can't reliably determine
when to force summary mode. Work is underway to improve
perf for megatopics so this will not be required
eventually.
Lucas Nicodemus
Sam
Penar Musaraj
Bianca Nenciu
Gerhard Schlager
Kyle Zhao
Jeff Wong
Arpit Jalan
Guo Xiang Tan
Rishabh
Neil Lalonde
Vinoth Kannan
Guo Xiang Tan
Maja Komel
Osama Sayegh
Davide Porrovecchio
Raul Tambre
Régis Hanol
Robin Ward
Joffrey JAFFEUX
David Taylor
Jeff Atwood
Leo McArdle
Andrew Schleifer
Patrick Gansterer
Kasia Bułat
hellekin