In 49a70a37f1 I removed the
topic: :posts preload for TopicBookmarkable, but did not
update the UserTopicBookmarkSerializer to reflect this,
which was causing up to multi-hundred millisecond queries to
be made for each topic bookmark based on the size of the
topic.
The logic to determine what post excerpt to show for
a topic-level bookmark based on the last unread post
was complex and slow, so we decided to remove it and
always just use the first post excerpt.
This commit also fixes an issue where a couple of
instances of for_topic were missed when doing the
Bookmarkable refactors, so:
1. Clicking the topic bookmark link was not taking
the user to the last unread post
2. When replying to a topic where there was a topic
level bookmark with the auto delete preference
of "on owner reply", we were not removing the
bookmark from the UI correctly.
A test has been added for the former, the latter would
be quite time-consuming to test and not really worth
it considering it's quite an edge case UI bug.
Previously, for every bookmarked topic, all topic_user records were being preloaded. Only the current user's record is actually required.
This commit introduces a new `perform_custom_preload!` API which bookmarkables can use to add custom preloading logic. We use this in topic_bookmarkable to load just the topic_user data we need (in the same way as `topic_list.rb`).
Co-authored-by: Blake Erickson <o.blakeerickson@gmail.com>
Some of the changes in this commit are extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
The bookmarks tab in the new user menu is different from the other tabs in that it can display a mixture of notifications and bookmarks. When there are unread bookmark reminder notifications, the tab displays all of these notifications at the top and fills the remaining space in the menu with the rest of the bookmarks. The bubble/badge count on the bookmarks tab indicates how many unread bookmark reminder notifications there are.
On the technical aspect, since this commit introduces a new `bookmark-item` component, we've done some refactoring so that all 3 "item" components (`notification-item`, `reviewable-item` and the new `bookmark-item`) inherit from a base component and get identical HTML structure so they all look consistent.
Internal tickets: t70584 and t65045.
We have a .ics endpoint for user bookmarks, this
commit makes it so polymorphic bookmarks work on
that endpoint, using the serializer associated with
the RegisteredBookmarkable.
This pull request follows on from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/16308. This one does the following:
* Changes `BookmarkQuery` to allow for querying more than just Post and Topic bookmarkables
* Introduces a `Bookmark.register_bookmarkable` method which requires a model, serializer, fields and preload includes for searching. These registered `Bookmarkable` types are then used when validating new bookmarks, and also when determining which serializer to use for the bookmark list. The `Post` and `Topic` bookmarkables are registered by default.
* Adds new specific types for Post and Topic bookmark serializers along with preloading of associations in `UserBookmarkList`
* Changes to the user bookmark list template to allow for more generic bookmarkable types alongside the Post and Topic ones which need to display in a particular way
All of these changes are gated behind the `use_polymorphic_bookmarks` site setting, apart from the .hbs changes where I have updated the original `UserBookmarkSerializer` with some stub methods.
Following this PR will be several plugin PRs (for assign, chat, encrypt) that will register their own bookmarkable types or otherwise alter the bookmark serializers in their own way, also gated behind `use_polymorphic_bookmarks`.
This commit also removes `BookmarkQuery.preloaded_custom_fields` and the functionality surrounding it. It was added in 0cd502a558 but only used by one plugin (discourse-assign) where it has since been removed, and is now used by no plugins. We don't need it anymore.
Martin Brennan
David Taylor
Osama Sayegh