There is an edge case where the following occurs:
1. The user sets a bookmark reminder on a post/topic
2. The post/topic is changed to a PM before or after the reminder
fires, and the notification remains unread by the user
3. The user opens their bookmark reminder notification list
and they can still see the notification even though they cannot
access the topic anymore
There is a very low chance for information leaking here, since
the only thing that could be exposed is the topic title if it
changes to something sensitive.
This commit filters the bookmark unread notifications by using
the bookmarkable can_see? methods and also prevents sending
reminder notifications for bookmarks the user can no longer see.
The logic to determine what post excerpt to show for
a topic-level bookmark based on the last unread post
was complex and slow, so we decided to remove it and
always just use the first post excerpt.
This commit also fixes an issue where a couple of
instances of for_topic were missed when doing the
Bookmarkable refactors, so:
1. Clicking the topic bookmark link was not taking
the user to the last unread post
2. When replying to a topic where there was a topic
level bookmark with the auto delete preference
of "on owner reply", we were not removing the
bookmark from the UI correctly.
A test has been added for the former, the latter would
be quite time-consuming to test and not really worth
it considering it's quite an edge case UI bug.
Previously, for every bookmarked topic, all topic_user records were being preloaded. Only the current user's record is actually required.
This commit introduces a new `perform_custom_preload!` API which bookmarkables can use to add custom preloading logic. We use this in topic_bookmarkable to load just the topic_user data we need (in the same way as `topic_list.rb`).
Co-authored-by: Blake Erickson <o.blakeerickson@gmail.com>
This is so we can join the Notification table onto the
Bookmark table. A slight refactor was needed to ensure
that the required values are always included and the
consumer does not need to think about this.
The discourse-chat and discourse-data-explorer plugins
will be updated to take advantage of this commit.
We have a `cleanup!` class method on bookmarks that deletes
bookmarks X days after their related record (post/topic) are
deleted. This commit changes this method to use the
registered_bookmarkables for this instead, and each bookmarkable
type can delete related bookmarks in their own way.
These validate/after_create/after_destroy methods were added
back in b8828d4a2d before
the RegisteredBookmarkable API and pattern was nailed down.
This commit updates BookmarkManager to call out to the
relevant bookmarkable for these and bookmark_metadata for
consistency.
A bit of a mixed bag, this addresses several edge areas of bookmarks and makes them compatible with polymorphic bookmarks (hidden behind the `use_polymorphic_bookmarks` site setting). The main ones are:
* ExportUserArchive compatibility
* SyncTopicUserBookmarked job compatibility
* Sending different notifications for the bookmark reminders based on the bookmarkable type
* Import scripts compatibility
* BookmarkReminderNotificationHandler compatibility
This PR also refactors the `register_bookmarkable` API so it accepts a class descended from a `BaseBookmarkable` class instead. This was done because we kept having to add more and more lambdas/properties inline and it was very messy, so a factory pattern is cleaner. The classes can be tested independently as well.
Some later PRs will address some other areas like the discourse narrative bot, advanced search, reports, and the .ics endpoint for bookmarks.
Martin Brennan
David Taylor