When a post is created using the API and goes into the review queue, we
would return a 'null' string in the response which isn't valid JSON.
Internal ref: /t/92419
Co-authored-by: Leonardo Mosquera <ldmosquera@gmail.com>
Improvements for this PR: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/20057
What was fixed:
- [x] Use ember transitions instead of full reload
- [x] Link was inaccurately kept active
- [x] "+ save" renamed to just "save"
- [x] Render emojis in link name
- [x] UI to set icon
- [x] Delete link is trash icon instead of "x"
- [x] Add another link to on the left and rewording
- [x] Raname "link name" -> "name", "points to" -> link
- [x] Add limits to fields
- [x] Move add section button to the bottom
* FIX: Remove action buttons if post has already been reviewed
* Change the approve to reject test to expect an error
* Adds a controller spec to ensure you can't edit a non-pending review item
* Remove unnessary conditional
This commits adds the ability to add a header to the embedded comments
view. One use case for this is to allow `postMessage` communication
between the comments iframe and the parent frame, for example, when
toggling the theme of the parent webpage.
The algorithm failed to find the correct category by slug when there are multiple sub-sub-categories with the same child-category name and the first child doesn't have the correct grandchild.
So, searching for "child / grandchild" worked in the following case, it found (3):
- (1) parent 1
- (2) child
- (3) grandchild
- (4) parent 2
- (5) child
- (6) grandchild
But it failed to find the grandchild in the following case:
- (1) parent 1
- (2) child
- (4) parent 2
- (5) child
- (6) grandchild
And this also fixes a flaky spec by forcing categories to always order by by `parent_category_id` and `id`.
This makes it possible to partly revert 60990aab55
Allows users to configure their own custom sidebar sections with links withing Discourse instance. Links can be passed as relative path, for example "/tags" or full URL.
Only path is saved in DB, so when Discourse domain is changed, links will be still valid.
Feature is hidden behind SiteSetting.enable_custom_sidebar_sections. This hidden setting determines the group which members have access to this new feature.
1. What is the problem here?
When a user's reviewables count changes, the changes are published via
MessageBus in a background Sidekiq job which means there is a delay before the
client receives the MessageBus message with the updated count. During
the time the reviewables count for a user has been updated and the time
when the client receives the MessageBus message with the updated count,
a user may view the reviewables list in the user menu. When that happens, the number of
reviewables in the list may be out of sync with the count shown.
2. What is the fix?
Going forward, the response for the `ReviewablesController#user_menu_list` action will include the user's reviewables count as
the `reviewables_count` attribute. This is then used by the client side
to update the user's reviewables count to ensure that the reviewables
list and count are kept in sync.
When we introduce new color scheme colors, they are not immediately persisted to the database for all color schemes. Previously, this meant that they would be unavailable in the admin UI for editing. The only way to work with the new colors was to create a new color scheme.
This commit updates the serializer so that all colors are serialized, even if they are not yet persisted to the database for the current scheme. This means that they now show up in the admin UI and can be edited.
Currently `Topic#pm_topic_count` is a count of all personal messages tagged for a given tag. As a result, any user with access to PM tags can poll a sensitive tag to determine if a new personal message has been created using that tag even if the user does not have access to the personal message. We classify this as a minor leak in sensitive information.
With this commit, `Topic#pm_topic_count` is hidden from users by default unless the `display_personal_messages_tag_counts` site setting is enabled.
In some situations, these HTTP calls would cause some cache to warmup and send a `/distributed_hash` message-bus message. We can avoid tracking those by passing a specific channel name to `track_publish`.
This commits adds a database migration to limit the user status to 100
characters, limits the user status in the UI and makes sure that the
emoji is valid.
Follow up to commit b6f75e231c.
When the `tags_listed_by_group` site setting is disable, we were seeing
the N+1 queries problem when multiple `CategoryTag` records are listed.
This commit fixes that by ensuring that we are not filtering through the
category `tags` association after the association has been eager loaded.
This assertion was failing in internal builds. I can repro locally if I
set `foobarbaz` to be created after `quxbarbaz`.
For now, I think this complication in the test is unnecessary, hence this
removes the `quxbarbaz` case.
When creating a group membership request, there is no character
limit on the 'reason' field. This can be potentially be used by
an attacker to create enormous amount of data in the database.
Co-authored-by: Ted Johansson <ted@discourse.org>
This is just cleaning up a TODO I had to add more specs
to this controller -- there are more thorough tests on the
actual HashtagService class and the type-specific hashtag
classes.
This commit allows us to set the channel slug when creating new chat
channels. As well as this, it introduces a new `SlugsController` which can
generate a slug using `Slug.for` and a name string for input. We call this
after the user finishes typing the channel name (debounced) and fill in
the autogenerated slug in the background, and update the slug input
placeholder.
This autogenerated slug is used by default, but if the user writes anything
else in the input it will be used instead.
Currently, `Tag#topic_count` is a count of all regular topics regardless of whether the topic is in a read restricted category or not. As a result, any users can technically poll a sensitive tag to determine if a new topic is created in a category which the user has not excess to. We classify this as a minor leak in sensitive information.
The following changes are introduced in this commit:
1. Introduce `Tag#public_topic_count` which only count topics which have been tagged with a given tag in public categories.
2. Rename `Tag#topic_count` to `Tag#staff_topic_count` which counts the same way as `Tag#topic_count`. In other words, it counts all topics tagged with a given tag regardless of the category the topic is in. The rename is also done so that we indicate that this column contains sensitive information.
3. Change all previous spots which relied on `Topic#topic_count` to rely on `Tag.topic_column_count(guardian)` which will return the right "topic count" column to use based on the current scope.
4. Introduce `SiteSetting.include_secure_categories_in_tag_counts` site setting to allow site administrators to always display the tag topics count using `Tag#staff_topic_count` instead.
Prior to this change, we were parsing `Post#cooked` every time we
serialize a post to extract the usernames of mentioned users in the
post. However, the only reason we have to do this is to support
displaying a user's status beside each mention in a post on the client side when
the `enable_user_status` site setting is enabled. When
`enable_user_status` is disabled, we should avoid having to parse
`Post#cooked` since there is no point in doing so.
Our JS files reference sourcemaps relative to their current path. On sites with non-S3 CDN setups, we use a special path for brotli assets (39a524aa). This caused the sourcemap requests to 404.
This commit fixes the issue by allowing the `.map` files to be accessed under `/brotli_asset/*`.
When the `tags_listed_by_group` site setting is enabled, we were seeing
the N+1 queries problem when multiple `TagGroup` records are listed.
This commit fixes that by ensuring that we are not filtering through the
`tags` association after the association has been eager loaded.
Added in c2013865d7,
this migration was supposed to only turn off the hashtag
setting for existing sites (since that was the old default)
but its doing it for new ones too because we run all migrations
on new sites.
Instead, we should only run this if the first migration was
only just created, meaning its a new site.
In "GlobalSetting.redirect_avatar_requests" mode, when the application gets
an avatar request it returns a "redirect" to the S3 CDN.
This shields the application from caching avatars and downloading from S3.
However clients will make 2 requests per avatar. (one to get redirect,
second to get avatar)
A one hour cache on a redirect means there may be an increase in CDN
traffic, given more clients will ask for the redirect every hour.
This may also lead to an increase in origin requests to the application.
To mitigate lets cache the CDN URL for 1 day.
The downside is that any changes to S3 CDN need extra care to allow for
the extra 1 day delay. (leave data around for 1 extra day)
If a secure upload's access_control_post was trashed, and an anon user
tried to look at that upload, they would get a 500 error rather than
the correct 403 because of an error inside the PostGuardian logic.