If you click on a bookmark in the post stream you get an Edit Bookmark modal. This does not happen if you click the topic bookmark button.
We want to open the Edit modal too if there is only one bookmark on a topic (it doesn't matter on the first post or not). The other behaviour if there are > 1 bookmarks in the topic is to prompt the user to confirm delete of all the bookmarks in the topic. This behaviour will stay as-is.
I have done some refactoring in this PR, and still, there is a place for improvement. For example, we don't call post.deleteBookmark() method when deleting several bookmarks. I just don't want to refactor too much in one PR.
The first thing we needed here was an enum rather than a boolean to determine how a directory_column was created. Now we have `automatic`, `user_field` and `plugin` directory columns.
This plugin API is assuming that the plugin has added a migration to a column to the `directory_items` table.
This was created to be initially used by discourse-solved. PR with API usage - https://github.com/discourse/discourse-solved/pull/137/
Anonymizing a user changed their email address, destroyed all
associated InvitedUser records, but did not destroy the invites
associated to user's email.
Note that this commit will also disable daily grouping for datasets with more than 30 data points. This will also smartly do the grouping by month when grouping a full year.
Profiling showed that we were roughly 10% of a request time creating all
the ActiveRecord objects for categories in the `Site` model on a site with 61 categories.
Instead of querying for the categories each time based on which categories the user can see,
we can just preload all of the categories upfront and filter out the
categories that the user can not see.
Adds the last updated at and by SMTP/IMAP fields to the UI, we were already storing them in the DB. Also makes sure that `imap_mailbox_name` being changed makes the last_updated_at/by field update for IMAP.
When dismissing new topics for the Tracked filter, the dismiss was
limited to 30 topics which is the default per page count for TopicQuery.
This happened even if you specified which topic IDs you were
selectively dismissing. This PR fixes that bug, and also moves
the per_page_count into a DEFAULT_PER_PAGE_COUNT for the TopicQuery
so it can be stubbed in tests.
Also moves the unused stub_const method into the spec helpers
for cases like this; it is much better to handle this in one place
with an ensure. In a follow up PR I will clean up other specs that
do the same thing and make them use stub_const.
The `bootstrap.json` contains most preloaded information but some routes
provide extra information, such as invites.
This fixes the issue by having the preload request pass on the preloaded
data from the source page, which is then merged with the bootstrap's
preloaded data for the final HTML payload.
Steps to reproduce the bug:
- Create bookmarks for several posts on a topic
- Click the topic level bookmark button, it’ll open the modal that asks to confirm clearing all bookmarks from the topic
- Choose No
- Try to push the topic level bookmark button again - it won’t work
And it's fixed with this commit
This can happen when an avatar-flair component is rendered to an anonymous user on a login_required site (e.g. when they are redeeming an invite). The lack of group information was causing an error to be raised. With this commit, it now simple skips rendering the flair.
* Revert "DEV: skips three tests following cc1e73 (#13386)"
This reverts commit 2be201660a.
* FIX: Do not refresh post stream twice
This also improves the test suite and simulates a long running request
* FIX: Update local copy of raw
When we call Bookmark.cleanup! we want to make sure that
topic_user.bookmarked is updated for topics linked to the
bookmarks that were deleted. Also when PostDestroyer calls
destroy and recover. We have a job for this already --
SyncTopicUserBookmarked -- so we just utilize that.
Subclasses must call #delete_user_actions inside build_actions to support user deletion. The method adds a delete user bundle, which has a delete and a delete + block option. Every subclass is responsible for implementing these actions.
Next Week should mean next Monday, Next Month - the first day of the next month, and so on.
Also, we'll be using the name "Next Monday" instead of "Next Week" because it's easier to understand. No one can get confused by next Monday.
* DEV: skips two tests following cc1e73
Following the fix in cc1e73b8e4 we now refresh the whole stream which causes expected states of these tests to not exist anymore.
I'm skipping theses tests while we decide for a better fix.
Adds a new `smtp_group_id` column to `EmailLog` which is filled in if the mail `from_address` matches a group's `email_username`. This is for easier debugging, so we know which emails have been sent via group SMTP.
We previously only showed the link to the Email section
of group settings if both SMTP and IMAP were enabled for
a site, but this is not necessary now, only SMTP can be
enabled by itself so we should show the section if SMTP
is enabled.
Rendering an empty flair element with the css `background-image: url();` causes the browser to attempt an image request against the current document URL. Making duplicate requests for the document URL can cause some unusual race conditions, especially related to cookies. If this user-avatar-flair element was present on the site homepage (e.g. if categories+latest is the homepage), then it can prevent the signup flow from working correctly.
This commit updates the user-avatar-flair component to be a transparent wrapper around the avatar-flair component. If the user has no flair, no avatar-flair element will be rendered. This avoids the `background-image: url();` situation, and fixes the auth flow.
This commit also removes the duplicate avatar flair rendering from the `latest-topic-list-item` component. This wasn't particularly obvious, since the duplicate flairs were being rendered directly on top of each other.
The problem was happening in component integration tests on the rendering stage, sometimes the rendering would never finish.
Using time moments in the future when faking time solves the problem. Unfortunately, I don't know why exactly it helps. It was just a lucky guess after some hours I spent trying to figure out what's going on. But I've done a lot of testings, so looks like it really works. I'll be monitoring builds for some time after merging this anyway.
Unit tests seem to work alright with moments in the past. And we don't fake time in acceptance tests at the moment but I guess they would very likely be flaky with time moments from the past since they also do rendering.
I'm actually thinking of moving all fake time moments to the future (including moments in unit tests) to decrease the chances of flakiness. But I don't want to do everything in one PR, because I can accidentally introduce new flakiness.
A pretty easy way of picking time moments in the future for tests is to use the 2100 year. It has the same calendar as 2021. If a day is Monday in 2021 it's Monday in 2100 too.
Before this fix if your forum was set up with a subfolder and you
clicked on a link to a different subfolder it would not work. For
example:
subfolder: /cool
link is: /about-us
Previously it would try to resolve /about-us as /cool/about-us. With
this fix it redirects to /about-us correctly.
Editing a post that was just posted caused it to be reloaded and made a
request to the server. This had an additional side effect where the
model instances used by post stream and composer would be different and
changes did not propagate correctly.
Notifying about a tag change sometimes resulted in loading a large
number of users in memory just to perform an exclusion. This commit
prefers to do inclusion (i.e. instead of exclude users X, do include
users in groups Y) and does it in SQL to avoid fetching unnecessary
data that is later discarded.
When replying to a user_private_message email originating from
a group PM that does _not_ have a reply key (e.g. when replying
directly to the group's SMTP address), we were mistakenly linking
the new post created from the reply to the OP and the user who
created the topic, based on the first IncomingEmail message ID in
the topic, rather than using the correct reply to user and post number
that the user actually replied to.
We now use the In-Reply-To header to look up the corresponding EmailLog
record when the user who replied was sent a user_private_message email,
and use the post from that as the reply_to_user/post.
This also removes superfluous filtering of incoming_email records. After
already filtering by message_id and then addressed_to_user (which only
returns incoming emails where the to, from, or cc address includes any
of the user's emails), we were filtering again but in the ruby code for
the exact same conditions. After removing this all existing tests still
pass.
Previously due to "rowheader" role we would read out topic titles twice.
This adjusts it so we apply the heading role only to the topic link.
In turn this makes navigation through topic lists more accurate (h) only
lands you on topic links. It also reduces the amount of duplicate reading
NVDA does.
Before:
Topic title link new topic link support link b481 link 19h link 2 button...
After:
Topic title link
This reduces noise, up and down once you land on a topic link can give you
more context.
* UX: Improvements to reorder categories UX
Before, moving a category from, for example, position 25 to position 0 would result in switching the positions of the two categories at those positions.
Category A at position 0 would move to position 25, and Category B at position 25 would move to position 0.
Instead of switching positions, the reorder categories function should retain the order of categories except for the one being moved.
So, Category B at position 25 would still move to position 0, but Category A is merely bumped down to position 1.
This improves the UX because if a user *really* wants to switch the two categories, it results in one extra step. However in the other (what I think is normal) case, it saves the 24 other switches the user has to make to get Category A back to position 1 (you can imagine the user having to click the up arrow button repeatedly to return Category A to the top of the page). Now, imagine trying to do this with a site with 100s of categories. Yikes!
The UX improvement described above is what this commit accomplishes by redesigning the `move()` method of the reorder-categories controller. It adds some overhead to adjust the positions of all categories in between the origin and target positions, but in testing this is not noticible to the user. It's better for the computer to do extra work than the user.
* UX: Allow decimal input in reorder-categories for more precise positioning.
A common UX pattern when reordering a list of items is to allow a user to specify a target position as a decimal between two valid integer positions. The user is indicating they want the target list item to move in between the list items at the positions on either side of the target position.
For example, say there are three categories Category A at position 0, Category B at position 1, and Category C at position 3.
To move Category C in between Categories A and B, a user can now simply update Category C's position to 0.5.
The `ember_jquery` bundle contains production builds of Ember and jQuery
which doesn't work with tests. This commits introduces a new
`theme_qunit_vendor` bundle which is copy of the `vendor` bundle but
doesn't contain `ember_jquery`.
This commit is a partial revert of
409c8585e4
Mark VanLandingham
Andrei Prigorshnev
Bianca Nenciu
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Dan Ungureanu
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
Martin Brennan
Robin Ward
David Taylor
Roman Rizzi
Vinoth Kannan
Sam
Kane York
Jordan Vidrine
Rafael dos Santos Silva
Jarek Radosz
Neil Lalonde
Penar Musaraj
Jeff Wong
Grayden
Osama Sayegh