Fixed bugs, added specs, extracted the upload downsizing code to a class, added support for non-S3 setups, changed it so that images aren't downloaded twice.
This code has been tested on production and successfully resized ~180k uploads.
Includes:
* DEV: Extract upload downsizing logic
* DEV: Add support for non-S3 uploads
* DEV: Process only images uploaded by users
* FIX: Incorrect usage of `count` and `exist?` typo
* DEV: Spec S3 image downsizing
* DEV: Avoid downloading images twice
* DEV: Update filesizes earlier in the process
* DEV: Return false on invalid upload
* FIX: Download images that currently above the limit (If the image size limit is decreased, then there was no way to resize those images that now fall outside the allowed size range)
* Update script/downsize_uploads.rb (Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>)
This came in as a request on meta to include the raw field in the post
webhook serializer.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/49045/55?u=blake
Including this field can prevent needing to make a 2nd API request to
get the raw field of a post.
It would be handy down the road if we updated the webhook ui to specify
fields or arguments that you wanted to be included in the serialized
data, but most requests I've seen to update the serializers have been
valid requests that are good to add anyways, so I don't think we have
reached that point yet.
FIX: prevent re-flagging when we have reviewed flags before
Fixes an edge case where a review can be reflagged when:
User flags as inappropriate.
Moderator rejects the flag.
Another user re-flags the post as spam.
Before, anyone was able to re-flag as inappropriate despite it being flagged
previously. With this, users are unable to re-flag for the same reason
regardless of reviewable status.
This test lasted about 7 years prior to it becoming flaky.
Today ... for whatever reason the test suite created 100 users
prior to running this spec. So the new user becomes user id 101
And... lo and behold:
```
1) PostSerializer a hidden post with add_raw enabled a hidden post shows the raw post only if authorized to see it
Failure/Error: expect(serialized_post_for_user(Fabricate(:user))[:raw]).to eq(nil)
expected: nil
got: "Raw contents of the post."
(compared using ==)
# ./spec/serializers/post_serializer_spec.rb:127:in `block (4 levels) in <main>'
```
We removed pry-nav a while back because it is not up to date with pry but it is super useful. Luckily pry-byebug is here to save us all from Satan's power.
To get this to work you need to add the following to your $HOME/.pryrc file.
```
if defined?(PryByebug)
Pry.commands.alias_command 'c', 'continue'
Pry.commands.alias_command 's', 'step'
Pry.commands.alias_command 'n', 'next'
Pry.commands.alias_command 'f', 'finish'
end
Pry::Commands.command /^$/, "repeat last command" do
pry_instance.run_command Pry.history.to_a.last
end
```
The require-ing of pry, pry-rails, and pry-byebug in specs is controlled by the IMPROVED_SPEC_DEBUGGING flag (disabled by default).
Adds new hidden site settings for rate limits:
30 for logged in users, 15 for anon
Adds an anon cache for searching, caches results of searches for 1 minute
Allow limiting the number of migrations to do at once, both to do migrations that
have impact limited to multiple off-peak usage hours to reduce user impact from
a migration, and to allow tests that do only a very small number for test
purposes. ("Give me a ping, Vasili. One ping only, please.")
Looks like some html elements like `aside` and `section` will throw an error
when checking if they are inline or not. The commit simply handles
```
Job exception: undefined method `inline?' for nil:NilClass
```
and adds a test for it.
Moves the most important checks into a linter. It gets executed by Lefthook as well as the docker rake task and Github actions. Doing those checks in rspec takes too long and it produces errors when the discourse:test Docker image contains old, invalid locale files.
Discourse needs a bunch of data preloaded before it can start up.
Normally we throw blobs of this into the HTML document that is requested
but in some cases that's awkward to retrieve.
For example with Ember CLI you have a separate javascript application
that needs to make its own HTML.
This API endpoint returns a JSON object with all the data Discourse needs to
bootstrap and start up.
In some restricted setups all JS payloads need tight control.
This setting bans admins from making changes to JS on the site and
requires all themes be whitelisted to be used.
There are edge cases we still need to work through in this mode
hence this is still not supported in production and experimental.
Use an example like this to enable:
`DISCOURSE_WHITELISTED_THEME_REPOS="https://repo.com/repo.git,https://repo.com/repo2.git"`
By default this feature is not enabled and no changes are made.
One exception is that default theme id was missing a security check
this was added for correctness.
If `default email digest frequency` was set to "Never", users would get
a `digest_after_minutes` set to `nil` which triggered this error
in the logs if/when the site eventually changed that setting and
enabled digests:
```
NoMethodError (undefined method `>=' for nil:NilClass)
/var/www/discourse/app/mailers/user_notifications.rb:227:in `digest'
```
* FEATURE: notify admins about old credentials
Security and API keys should be renewed periodically.
This additional notification should help admins keep their Discourse safe and secure.
Previously the pull hotlinked images job was skipped after system edits. This ensured that we never had an infinite loop of system-edit/pull-hotlinked/system-edit/pull-hotlinked etc.
A side effect was that edits made by system for any other reason (e.g. API, removing full quotes) would prevent pulling hotlinked images. This commit removes the system edit check, and replaces it with another method to avoid an infinite job scheduling loop.
Hostname can vary per-site on a multisite cluster, so this change requires converting the compiler_version from a constant into a class method which is evaluated at runtime. The value is stored in the theme DistributedCache, so performance impact should be negligible.
We previously did not account for completely untagged topics when
looking at muted tags, this caused new/unread counts to be off if
1. You had muted tags
2. You had an unread/new topic
3. This topic had no tags