Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Taylor cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `spec/*` 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Bianca Nenciu b80765f1f4
DEV: Remove enable_whispers site setting (#19196)
* DEV: Remove enable_whispers site setting

Whispers are enabled as long as there is at least one group allowed to
whisper, see whispers_allowed_groups site setting.

* DEV: Always enable whispers for admins if at least one group is allowed.
2022-12-16 18:42:51 +02:00
Martin Brennan f5194aadd3
DEV: Remove usages of enable_personal_messages (#18437)
cf. e62e93f83a

This PR also makes it so `bot` (negative ID) and `system` users are always allowed
to send PMs, since the old conditional was just based on `enable_personal_messages`
2022-10-05 10:50:20 +10:00
Phil Pirozhkov 493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek 09932738e5
FEATURE: whispers available for groups (#17170)
Before, whispers were only available for staff members.

Config has been changed to allow to configure privileged groups with access to whispers. Post migration was added to move from the old setting into the new one.

I considered having a boolean column `whisperer` on user model similar to `admin/moderator` for performance reason. Finally, I decided to keep looking for groups as queries are only done for current user and didn't notice any N+1 queries.
2022-06-30 10:18:12 +10:00
Martin Brennan c6c633e041
FIX: Issues with incorrect unread and private message topic tracking state (#16474)
This commit fixes two issues at play. The first was introduced
in f6c852b (or maybe not introduced
but rather revealed). When a user posted a new message in a topic,
they received the unread topic tracking state MessageBus message,
and the Unread (X) indicator was incremented by one, because with the
aforementioned perf commit we "guess" the correct last read post
for the user, because we no longer calculate individual users' read
status there. This meant that every time a user posted in a topic
they tracked, the unread indicator was incremented. To get around
this, we can just exclude the user who created the post from the
target users of the unread state message.

The second issue was related to the private message topic tracking
state, and was somewhat similar. Whenever a user created a new private
message, the New (X) indicator was incremented, and could not be
cleared until the page was refreshed. To solve this, we just don't
update the topic state for the user when the new_topic tracking state
message comes through if the user who created the topic is the
same as the current user.

cf. https://meta.discourse.org/t/bottom-of-topic-shows-there-is-1-unread-remaining-when-there-are-actually-0-unread-topics-remaining/220817
2022-04-19 11:37:01 +10:00
David Taylor c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan a1745e05ae
FIX: Do not publish post for PM topic tracking if not new for user. (#14469) 2021-09-29 13:54:24 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan bc23dcd30b
FIX: Don't publish PM archive events to acting user. (#14291)
When a user archives a personal message, they are redirected back to the
inbox and will refresh the list of the topics for the given filter.
Publishing an event to the user results in an incorrect incoming message
because the list of topics has already been refreshed.

This does mean that if a user has two tabs opened, the non-active tab
will not receive the incoming message but at this point we do not think
the technical trade-offs are worth it to support this feature. We
basically have to somehow exclude a client from an incoming message
which is not easy to do.

Follow-up to fc1fd1b416
2021-09-10 09:20:50 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan 412587f70a
FEATURE: Publish read topic tracking events for private messages. (#14274)
Follow-up to fc1fd1b416
2021-09-09 09:16:53 +08:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan f66007ec83
FEATURE: Display unread and new counts for messages. (#14059)
There are certain design decisions that were made in this commit.

Private messages implements its own version of topic tracking state because there are significant differences between regular and private_message topics. Regular topics have to track categories and tags while private messages do not. It is much easier to design the new topic tracking state if we maintain two different classes, instead of trying to mash this two worlds together.

One MessageBus channel per user and one MessageBus channel per group. This allows each user and each group to have their own channel backlog instead of having one global channel which requires the client to filter away unrelated messages.
2021-08-25 11:17:56 +08:00