* DEV: Fix flaky admin badges.json api docs spec
This commit is to fix this incredibly vague error message:
```
Failure/Error: expect(valid).to eq(true)
expected: true
got: false
```
From this test:
> Assertion: badges /admin/badges.json get success response behaves like
> a JSON endpoint response body matches the documented response schema
I was finally able to repro locally using parallel tests:
```
RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec ./bin/turbo_rspec
```
I *think* the parallel tests might be swallowing the `puts` output, but
when I also specified the individual spec file
```
RAILS_ENV=test bundle exec ./bin/turbo_rspec spec/requests/api/badges_spec.rb
```
It revealed the issue:
```
VALIDATION DETAILS: {"missing_keys"=>["i18n_name"]}
```
``` ruby
...
def include_i18n_name?
object.system?
end
```
Looks like if the "system" user isn't being used the `i18n_name` won't
be returned in the json response so we shouldn't mark it as a required
attribute.
* Switch to using fab!
When using `let(:badge)` to fabricate a test badge it wouldn't be
returned from the controller, but switching to using `fab!` allows it to
be returned in the json data giving us a non-system badge to test
against.
From the openapi spec:
https://spec.openapis.org/oas/latest.html#fixed-fields-7
each endpoint needs to have an `operationId`:
> Unique string used to identify the operation. The id MUST be unique
> among all operations described in the API. The operationId value is
> case-sensitive. Tools and libraries MAY use the operationId to uniquely
> identify an operation, therefore, it is RECOMMENDED to follow common
> programming naming conventions.
Running the linter on our openapi.json file with this command:
`npx @redocly/openapi-cli lint openapi.json`
produced the following warning on all of our endpoints:
> Operation object should contain `operationId` field
This commit resolves these warnings by adding an operationId field to
each endpoint.
David Taylor
Phil Pirozhkov
Blake Erickson