They can use the remove vote button or select the same option again for
single choice polls.
This commit refactor the plugin to properly organize code and make it
easier to follow.
Over the years we accrued many spelling mistakes in the code base.
This PR attempts to fix spelling mistakes and typos in all areas of the code that are extremely safe to change
- comments
- test descriptions
- other low risk areas
Adds an optional title attribute to polls. The rationale for this addition is that polls themselves didn't contain context/question and relied on post body to explain them. That context wasn't always obvious (e.g. when there are multiple polls in a single post) or available (e.g. when you display the poll breakdown - you see the answers, but not the question)
As a side note, here's a word on how the poll plugin works:
> We have a markdown poll renderer, which we use in the builder UI and the composer preview, but… when you submit a post, raw markdown is cooked into html (twice), then we extract data from the generated html and save it to the database. When it's render time, we first display the cooked html poll, and then extract some data from that html, get the data from the post's JSON (and identify that poll using the extracted html stuff) to then render the poll using widgets and the JSON data.
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.
Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
* FEATURE: introduces minimum trust level for polls
This commit makes `poll_enabled` less misleading and introduces `poll_minimum_trust_level_to_create`. If poll are enabled they will always be cooked, and if you have the required trust level you can create polls. As a side effect, it also fixes a bug where rebaking a post created by staff member when `poll_enabled=false` would end up not cooking it.
It also adds more tests to ensure settings are respected.
* admins should be whitelisted
* checks for admin in post validation
* test for >= instead of == trust level
Since rspec-rails 3, the default installation creates two helper files:
* `spec_helper.rb`
* `rails_helper.rb`
`spec_helper.rb` is intended as a way of running specs that do not
require Rails, whereas `rails_helper.rb` loads Rails (as Discourse's
current `spec_helper.rb` does).
For more information:
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/upgrade#default-helper-files
In this commit, I've simply replaced all instances of `spec_helper` with
`rails_helper`, and renamed the original `spec_helper.rb`.
This brings the Discourse project closer to the standard usage of RSpec
in a Rails app.
At present, every spec relies on loading Rails, but there are likely
many that don't need to. In a future pull request, I hope to introduce a
separate, minimal `spec_helper.rb` which can be used in tests which
don't rely on Rails.
- add User.staff scope
- inject MessageBus into Ember views (so it can be used by the poll plugin)
- REFACTOR: use more accurate is_first_post? method instead of post_number == 1
- FEATURE: add support for JSON-typed custom fields
- FEATURE: allow plugins to add validation
- FEATURE: add post_custom_fields to PostSerializer
- FEATURE: allow plugins to whitelist post_custom_fields
- FIX: don't bump when post did not save successfully
- FEATURE: polls are supported in any post
- FEATURE: allow for multiple polls in the same post
- FEATURE: multiple choice polls
- FEATURE: rating polls
- FEATURE: new dialect allowing users to preview polls in the composer
Bianca Nenciu
Josh Soref
chenyxuan
Jarek Radosz
Dan Ungureanu
Mark VanLandingham
Guo Xiang Tan
Sam Saffron
Régis Hanol
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Guo Xiang Tan
Gerhard Schlager
Andy Waite