1) Edit Category when editing a category with form templates set should have form templates enabled and showing the selected templates
Failure/Error: expect(category_page).to have_selected_template(selected_templates)
expected `#<PageObjects::Pages::Category:0x00007fdb278fbd30>.has_selected_template?("template_0,template_1")` to be truthy, got false
Wait for CSS rather than trying to compare attr directly
and also make sure the ids are always in order.
Page settings can be very long and the setting can be way out of viewport. This should ensure the setting can be found and clicked.
This was for example causing this flakey in discourse-topic-voting:
```
Failures:
1) Voting enables voting in category topics and votes
Failure/Error: find(".edit-category-tab .#{setting} label.checkbox-label", text: text).click
Capybara::ElementNotFound:
Unable to find css ".edit-category-tab .enable-topic-voting label.checkbox-label"
[Screenshot Image]: /__w/discourse/discourse/tmp/capybara/failures_r_spec_example_groups_voting_enables_voting_in_category_topics_and_votes_873.png
~~~~~~~ JS LOGS ~~~~~~~
http://localhost:31341/favicon.ico - Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)
~~~~~ END JS LOGS ~~~~~
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/node/finders.rb:312:in `block in synced_resolve'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/node/base.rb:84:in `synchronize'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/node/finders.rb:301:in `synced_resolve'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/node/finders.rb:60:in `find'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/session.rb:773:in `find'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/dsl.rb:52:in `call'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/capybara-3.39.1/lib/capybara/dsl.rb:52:in `find'
# ./spec/system/page_objects/pages/category.rb:34:in `toggle_setting'
# ./plugins/discourse-topic-voting/spec/system/voting_spec.rb:39:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:368:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:189:in `block in timeout'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:36:in `block in catch'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:36:in `catch'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:36:in `catch'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/timeout-0.3.2/lib/timeout.rb:198:in `timeout'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:364:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./spec/rails_helper.rb:356:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
# ./vendor/bundle/ruby/3.2.0/gems/webmock-3.18.1/lib/webmock/rspec.rb:37:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
Finished in 7 minutes 18 seconds (files took 0 seconds to load)
445 examples, 1 failure, 17 pending, 1 error occurred outside of examples
Failed examples:
rspec ./plugins/discourse-topic-voting/spec/system/voting_spec.rb:27 # Voting enables voting in category topics and votes
```
added site toggle functionality through site settings
added tests to implemented feature
Introduced suggested correction
renamed find_new_topic method and deleted click_new_topic_button method
What is the problem?
We are relying on RSpec custom matchers in system tests by defining
predicates in page objects. The problem is that this can result in a
system test unnecessarily waiting up till the full duration of
Capybara's default wait time when the RSpec custom matcher is used with
`not_to`. Considering this topic page object where we have a `has_post?`
predicate defined.
```
class Topic < PageObject
def has_post?
has_css?('something')
end
end
```
The assertion `expect(Topic.new).not_to have_post` will end up waiting
the full Capybara's default wait time since the RSpec custom matcher is
calling Capybara's `has_css?` method which will wait until the selector
appear. If the selector has already disappeared by the time the
assertion is called, we end up waiting for something that will never
exists.
This commit fixes such cases by introducing new predicates that uses
the `has_no_*` versions of Capybara's node matchers.
For future reference, `to have_css` and `not_to have_css` is safe to sue
because the RSpec matcher defined by Capbyara is smart enough to call
`has_css?` or `has_no_css?` based on the expectation of the assertion.
What is the problem?
We have a hidden site setting `show_category_definitions_in_topic_lists`
which is set to false by default. What this means is that category
definition topics are not shown in the topic list by default. Only the
category definition topic for the category being viewed will be shown.
However, we have a bug where we would show that a category has new
topics when a new child category along with its category definition
topic is created even though the topic list does not list the child
category's category definition topic.
What is the fix here?
This commit fixes the problem by shipping down an additional
`is_category_topic` attribute in `TopicTrackingStateItemSerializer` when
the `show_category_definitions_in_topic_lists` site setting has been set
to false. With the new attribute, we can then exclude counting child
categories' category definition topics when counting new and unread
counts for a category.
Martin Brennan
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Juan David Martínez Cubillos
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
Keegan George
David Taylor
Natalie Tay