When changing upload security using `Upload#update_secure_status`,
we may not have the context of how an upload is being created, because
this code path can be run through scheduled jobs. When calling
update_secure_status, the normal ActiveRecord validations are run,
and ours include validating extensions. In some cases the upload
is created in an automated way, such as user export zips, and the
security is applied later, with the extension prohibited from
use when normally uploading.
This caused the upload to fail validation on `update_secure_status`,
causing the security change to silently fail. This fixes the issue
by skipping the file extension validation when the upload security
is being changed.
1. When the select-kit body is rendered, it defaults to being displayed under the triggering select-kit header, unless...
there isn't enough space between the bottom of the select-kit header and the bottom of the viewport
&
there's enough space on top of the select-kit header, and in that case, we render it on top.
2. We give it a bit of padding on top, so it never renders below the header on the Z-axis.
14778ba52e/app/assets/javascripts/select-kit/addon/components/select-kit.js (L877-L884)
3. If there isn't enough space between the bottom of the viewport and the bottom of the select-kit header, and there isn't enough space between its top and the bottom of `d-header`, it renders at the bottom of the select-kit header.
In theory, number 3 above rarely ever happens. However, it can occur in the case of the user preferences page in combination with a large select-kit body (many categories).
The select-kit body then renders below the trigging select-kit header, but it's cut off. Users won't be able to see the entire select-kit body.
Here's an example
a719734d92.mp4
This PR adds a "prevent overflow" modifier to Popper. What it does is that it handles the case above.
If there's not enough space below the select-kit header or above it, render the select-kit body below the select-kit header BUT... anchor it to the bottom of the viewport.
Here's what that looks like
32cd1639bb.mp4
After this fix, even very large select-kit bodies will always be on the screen.
Please note that this PR has no impact on either number 1 or number 2 above, and those will continue to function as they currently do.
The only downside here is that the select-kit body might cover the select-kit header if it needs to be anchored at the bottom of the viewport, and it's very large. However, between that and not being able to see all the options, I think it's a fair compromise. There's only so much space in the viewport.
This PR ignores mobile because we have a different placement strategy. We use `position: absolute`... so, users can scroll the viewport if needed.
Previously, 'crop' would resize the image to have the requested width, then crop the height to the requested value. This works when cropping images vertically, but not when cropping them horizontally.
For example, trying to crop a 500x500 image to 200x500 was actually resulting in a 200x200 image. Having an OptimizedImage with width/height columns mismatching the actual OptimizedImage width/height causes some unusual issues.
This commit ensures that a call to `OptimizedImage.crop(from, to, width, height)` will always return an image of the requested width/height. The `w x h^` syntax defines minimum width/height, while maintaining aspect ratio.
This commit fixes two issues at play. The first was introduced
in f6c852b (or maybe not introduced
but rather revealed). When a user posted a new message in a topic,
they received the unread topic tracking state MessageBus message,
and the Unread (X) indicator was incremented by one, because with the
aforementioned perf commit we "guess" the correct last read post
for the user, because we no longer calculate individual users' read
status there. This meant that every time a user posted in a topic
they tracked, the unread indicator was incremented. To get around
this, we can just exclude the user who created the post from the
target users of the unread state message.
The second issue was related to the private message topic tracking
state, and was somewhat similar. Whenever a user created a new private
message, the New (X) indicator was incremented, and could not be
cleared until the page was refreshed. To solve this, we just don't
update the topic state for the user when the new_topic tracking state
message comes through if the user who created the topic is the
same as the current user.
cf. https://meta.discourse.org/t/bottom-of-topic-shows-there-is-1-unread-remaining-when-there-are-actually-0-unread-topics-remaining/220817
It used to show the warning that said only members of certain groups
could view the topic even if the group "everyone" was listed in
category's permission list.
This updates the fix in commit eb70ea4.
Co-authored-by: Osama Sayegh <asooomaasoooma90@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
This PR will include `suspended` attribute in post serializer to check it in post widget and add a CSS class name.
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
The main difference is that Sprockets 4.0 no longer tries to compile everything by default. This is good for us, because we can remove all our custom 'exclusion' logic which was working around the old sprockets 3.0 behavior.
The other big change is that lambdas can no longer be added to the `config.assets.precompile` array. Instead, we can do the necessary globs ourselves, and add the desired files manually.
A small patch is required to make ember-rails compatible. Since we plan to remove this dependency in the near future, I do not intend to upstream this change.
I have compared the `bin/rake assets:precompile` output before and after this change, and verified that all files are present.
The error would happen when emoji_autocomplete_min_chars site setting is set to anything superior to 0, in this case until we reach the min chars length, emojiSearch would return "skip" and the code was currently expecting an array.
Discourse has the Discourse Connect Provider protocol that makes it possible to
use a Discourse instance as an identity provider for external sites. As a
natural extension to this protocol, this PR adds a new feature that makes it
possible to use Discourse as a 2FA provider as well as an identity provider.
The rationale for this change is that it's very difficult to implement 2FA
support in a website and if you have multiple websites that need to have 2FA,
it's unrealistic to build and maintain a separate 2FA implementation for each
one. But with this change, you can piggyback on Discourse to take care of all
the 2FA details for you for as many sites as you wish.
To use Discourse as a 2FA provider, you'll need to follow this guide:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/32974. It walks you through what you need to
implement on your end/site and how to configure your Discourse instance. Once
you're done, there is only one additional thing you need to do which is to
include `require_2fa=true` in the payload that you send to Discourse.
When Discourse sees `require_2fa=true`, it'll prompt the user to confirm their
2FA using whatever methods they've enabled (TOTP or security keys), and once
they confirm they'll be redirected back to the return URL you've configured and
the payload will contain `confirmed_2fa=true`. If the user has no 2FA methods
enabled however, the payload will not contain `confirmed_2fa`, but it will
contain `no_2fa_methods=true`.
You'll need to be careful to re-run all the security checks and ensure the user
can still access the resource on your site after they return from Discourse.
This is very important because there's nothing that guarantees the user that
will come back from Discourse after they confirm 2FA is the same user that
you've redirected to Discourse.
Internal ticket: t62183.
The main difference is that Sprockets 4.0 no longer tries to compile everything by default. This is good for us, because we can remove all our custom 'exclusion' logic which was working around the old sprockets 3.0 behavior.
The other big change is that lambdas can no longer be added to the `config.assets.precompile` array. Instead, we can do the necessary globs ourselves, and add the desired files manually.
A small patch is required to make ember-rails compatible. Since we plan to remove this dependency in the near future, I do not intend to upstream this change.
I have compared the `bin/rake assets:precompile` output before and after this change, and verified that all files are present.
`Scoped order is ignored, it's forced to be batch order.`
`find_each` ignores the `order` scope and triggers a warning in
production which is noisy.
Follow-up to 7a284164ce
Isaac Janzen
Joffrey JAFFEUX
dependabot[bot]
Martin Brennan
Kris
Rafael dos Santos Silva
Isaac Janzen
Bianca Nenciu
Daniel Waterworth
Roman Rizzi
David Taylor
Discourse Translator Bot
Joe
Joshua Rosenfeld
Mark VanLandingham
Natalie Tay
Vinoth Kannan
Jordan Vidrine
Penar Musaraj
Gerhard Schlager
Osama Sayegh
Alan Guo Xiang Tan