When the client received a new notification, it prioritized only PM
notifications instead of maintaining the priority order. Later, the
check for missing notification deleted all notifications that were
in the wrong order because it could not match the IDs.
The correct order puts high_priority AND unread notifications first.
Low priority or read notifications (including high priority, but read
notifications) come after.
Original PR which had to be reverted **https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/12555**. See the description there for what this PR is achieving, plus below.
The issue with the original PR is addressed in 92ef54f402
If you went to the `x unread` link for a tag Chrome would freeze up and possibly crash, or eventually unfreeze after nearly 10 mins. Other routes for unread/new were similarly slow. From profiling the issue was the `sync` function of `topic-tracking-state.js`, which calls down to `isNew` which in turn calls `moment`, a change I had made in the PR above. The time it takes locally with ~1400 topics in the tracking state is 2.3 seconds.
To solve this issue, I have moved these calculations for "created in new period" and "unread not too old" into the tracking state serializer.
When I was looking at the profiler I also noticed this issue which was just compounding the problem. Every time we modify topic tracking state we recalculate the sidebar tracking/everything/tag counts. However this calls `forEachTracked` and `countTags` which can be quite expensive as they go through the whole tracking state (and were also calling the removed moment functions).
I added some logs and this was being called 30 times when navigating to a new /unread route because `sync` is being called from `build-topic-route` (one for each topic loaded due to pagination). So I just added a debounce here and it makes things even faster.
Finally, I changed topic tracking state to use a Map so our counts of the state keys is faster (Maps have .size whereas objects you have to do Object.keys(obj) which is O(n).)
A non-staff user cannot post to a closed topic, so we should not
show them the modal asking "Which topic do you want to reply to?"
This also fixes an issue I ran into while testing the above change, in
Ember CLI an error was being raised because related messages were being
set inside a computed property.
This overhauls the user interface for the group email settings management, aiming to make it a lot easier to test the settings entered and confirm they are correct before proceeding. We do this by forcing the user to test the settings before they can be saved to the database. It also includes some quality of life improvements around setting up IMAP and SMTP for our first supported provider, GMail. This PR does not remove the old group email config, that will come in a subsequent PR. This is related to https://meta.discourse.org/t/imap-support-for-group-inboxes/160588 so read that if you would like more backstory.
### UI
Both site settings of `enable_imap` and `enable_smtp` must be true to test this. You must enable SMTP first to enable IMAP.
You can prefill the SMTP settings with GMail configuration. To proceed with saving these settings you must test them, which is handled by the EmailSettingsValidator.
If there is an issue with the configuration or credentials a meaningful error message should be shown.
IMAP settings must also be validated when IMAP is enabled, before saving.
When saving IMAP, we fetch the mailboxes for that account and populate them. This mailbox must be selected and saved for IMAP to work (the feature acts as though it is disabled until the mailbox is selected and saved):
### Database & Backend
This adds several columns to the Groups table. The purpose of this change is to make it much more explicit that SMTP/IMAP is enabled for a group, rather than relying on settings not being null. Also included is an UPDATE query to backfill these columns. These columns are automatically filled when updating the group.
For GMail, we now filter the mailboxes returned. This is so users cannot use a mailbox like Sent or Trash for syncing, which would generally be disastrous.
There is a new group endpoint for testing email settings. This may be useful in the future for other places in our UI, at which point it can be extracted to a more generic endpoint or module to be included.
* FIX: Improve GitHub folder regexp in Onebox
It used to match any GitHub URL that was not matched by the other GitHub
Oneboxes and it did not do a good job at handling those. With this
change, the generic Onebox will handle the remaining URLs.
* FEATURE: Add Onebox for GitHub Actions
* FEATURE: Add Onebox for PR check runs
* FIX: Remove image from GitHub folder Oneboxes
It is a generic, auto-generated image which does not provide any value.
* DEV: Add tests
* FIX: Strip HTML comments from PR body
* UX: alert screen readers when there is an issue saving a post
Adds a "alert" role to various popup-input-tips.
This means screen reader users can now tell why a post refuses to save.
Also ensures like icon in the "try the like button" has screen reader support
Previously auto focus would only work on modals that include buttons or
inputs.
To avoid a situation where information modals such as keyboard shortcuts
do not get focus, simply focus on the close button as a fallback.
There are two methods which the server uses to verify an invite is being redeemed with a matching email:
1) The email token, supplied via a `?t=` parameter
2) The validity of the email, as provided by the auth provider
Only one of these needs to be true for the invite to be redeemed successfully on the server. The frontend logic was previously only checking (2). This commit updates the frontend logic to match the server.
This commit does not affect the invite redemption logic. It only affects the 'show' endpoint, and the UI.
Previously we had no role set for various topic links, nor did we have any
headers.
This teaches screen readers that topic links in topic lists are to be treated
as H2. We opted for this less radical change cause a change of the element
type would probably result in many broken themes.
Confirmed on NVDA you can very quickly breeze through topic lists now. Minor
edge case is pinned topics which can be a bit annoying due to multiple links.
The previous commits removed reviewables leading to a bad user
experience. This commit updates the status, replaces actions with a
message and greys out the reviewable.
We now bundle Javascript for each theme/plugin separately, and only ship bundles for enabled plugins to the client. Therefore, these disabled_plugins checks are now redundant, and can be removed.
This PR improves the UI of bulk select so that its context is applied to the Dismiss Unread and Dismiss New buttons. Regular users (not just staff) are now able to use topic bulk selection on the /new and /unread routes to perform these dismiss actions more selectively.
For Dismiss Unread, there is a new count in the text of the button and in the modal when one or more topic is selected with the bulk select checkboxes.
For Dismiss New, there is a count in the button text, and we have added functionality to the server side to accept an array of topic ids to dismiss new for, instead of always having to dismiss all new, the same as the bulk dismiss unread functionality. To clean things up, the `DismissTopics` service has been rolled into the `TopicsBulkAction` service.
We now also show the top Dismiss/Dismiss New button based on whether the bottom one is in the viewport, not just based on the topic count.
Not all screen readers treat articles as navigable roles when moving between landmarks. To help with this, we use a `heading` role on the title, with an arbitrary depth of 2 chosen as to not conflict with the main `<h1/>`. Because ARIA roles are used, this change should be entirely non-visual.
While this introduces minor navigation challenges in posts where headers are included, the vast majority of posts don't, and as screen reader users, we're used to mixed headers in longer-form content.
NVDA does not detect HTML5 articles as regions. This explicitly sets a
region with an aria-label denoting post numbers making it much easier to
know where you are in a topic.
Note role: article which is more semantically correct is not respected by
NVDA d/D shortcut, hence the much more generic "region" role.
When slow mode is enabled it's possible to open the slow mode dialog again to disable it or to update slow mode settings. The problem is that in this case, the button for saving still has the label "Enable" which is confusing.
This changes the text on the button from "Enable" to "Update" when slow mode is already enabled.
Based on feedback from Matt Haughey, we don't need to use so many words when describing a deleted topic or post.
Co-authored-by: Martin Brennan <martin@discourse.org>
If reload a page after enabling slow mode and open the slow mode dialog again it would show a slow mode interval but wouldn't show Enabled Until value. This PR fixes it.
It used to allow adding email addresses to a group even if invites were
disabled for the site. This does not allow user to input email address
if they cannot invite.
The second thing this commit improves is the message that is displayed
to the user when they hit the invite rate limit.
Osama Sayegh
Dan Ungureanu
Martin Brennan
Penar Musaraj
Jordan Vidrine
Robin Ward
Bianca Nenciu
Sam
Kris
Jarek Radosz
David Taylor
Roman Rizzi
Nolan Darilek
Mark VanLandingham
Andrei Prigorshnev
Jeff Atwood
Jeff Wong