Commit Graph

47 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Penar Musaraj 8cf2f909f5
DEV: Dedicated route for current user notification counts (#26106)
Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
2024-03-15 12:08:37 -04:00
Mark VanLandingham ee05f57e2d
FEATURE: Site setting to display user avatars in user menu (#24514) 2023-12-07 11:30:44 -06:00
Mark VanLandingham 7d35e406ba
DEV: Add support for limit in notifications index w/o recent param (#24423)
Currently to use a limit in the notifications index, you have to also pass recent: true as a param.

This PR:

Adds optional limit param to be used in the notifications query, regardless of the presence of recent
Raises the max limit of the response with recent present from 50 -> 60. It is super weird we have a hard-limit of 50 before with recent param, and 60 without the param.
2023-11-17 08:22:18 -06:00
Martin Brennan 3c5fb871c0 SECURITY: Filter unread bookmark reminders the user cannot see
There is an edge case where the following occurs:

1. The user sets a bookmark reminder on a post/topic
2. The post/topic is changed to a PM before or after the reminder
   fires, and the notification remains unread by the user
3. The user opens their bookmark reminder notification list
   and they can still see the notification even though they cannot
   access the topic anymore

There is a very low chance for information leaking here, since
the only thing that could be exposed is the topic title if it
changes to something sensitive.

This commit filters the bookmark unread notifications by using
the bookmarkable can_see? methods and also prevents sending
reminder notifications for bookmarks the user can no longer see.
2023-11-09 13:39:16 +11:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan bfc3132bb2
SECURITY: Impose a upper bound on limit params in various controllers
What is the problem here?

In multiple controllers, we are accepting a `limit` params but do not
impose any upper bound on the values being accepted. Without an upper
bound, we may be allowing arbituary users from generating DB queries
which may end up exhausing the resources on the server.

What is the fix here?

A new `fetch_limit_from_params` helper method is introduced in
`ApplicationController` that can be used by controller actions to safely
get the limit from the params as a default limit and maximum limit has
to be set. When an invalid limit params is encountered, the server will
respond with the 400 response code.
2023-07-28 12:53:46 +01:00
Keegan George 082821c754
DEV: Remove legacy user menu (#21308) 2023-05-17 09:16:42 -07:00
David Taylor 5a003715d3
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `app/*` 2023-01-09 14:14:59 +00:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan fde9e6bc25
DEV: Migrate sidebar site settings (#19336)
This new site setting replaces the
`enable_experimental_sidebar_hamburger` and `enable_sidebar` site
settings as the sidebar feature exits the experimental phase.

Note that we're replacing this without depreciation since the previous
site setting was considered experimental.

Internal Ref: /t/86563
2022-12-08 09:44:29 +08:00
Martin Brennan c6ee28ec75
SECURITY: Hide notifications for inaccessible topics (#19208)
Filter notifications the user cannot see anymore
via guardian.can_see_topic_ids
2022-11-28 10:41:57 +10:00
Osama Sayegh 4d05e3edab
DEV: Include pending reviewables in the main tab in the user menu (#18471)
This commit makes pending reviewables show up in the main tab (a.k.a. "all notifications" tab). Pending reviewables along with unread notifications are always shown first and they're sorted based on their creation date (most recent comes first).

The dismiss button currently only shows up if there are unread notifications and it doesn't dismiss pending reviewables. We may follow up with another change soon that allows makes the dismiss button work with reviewables and remove them from the list without taking any action on them. 

Follow-up to 079450c9e4.
2022-10-05 12:30:02 +03:00
Osama Sayegh 1fa21ed415
DEV: Prioritize unread notifications in the experimental user menu (#18216)
Right now the experimental user menu sorts notifications the same way that the old menu does: unread high-priority notifications are shown first in reverse-chronological order followed by everything else also in reverse-chronological order. However, since the experimental user menu has dedicated tabs for some notification types and each tab displays a badge with the count of unread notifications in the tab, we feel like it makes sense to change how notifications are sorted in the experimental user menu to this:

1. unread high-priority notifications
2. unread regular notifications
3. all read notifications (both high-priority and regular)
4. within each group, notifications are sorted in reverse-chronological order (i.e. newest is shown first).

This new sorting logic applies to all tabs in the experimental user menu, however it doesn't change anything in the old menu. With this change, if a tab in the experimental user menu shows an unread notification badge for a really old notification, it will be surfaced to the top and prevents confusing scenarios where a user sees an unread notification badge on a tab, but the tab doesn't show the unread notification because it's too old to make it to the list.

Internal topic: t72199.
2022-09-12 21:19:25 +03:00
Osama Sayegh 062a5f316d
DEV: Wire up the dimiss button in the new notifications menu (#17745)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-08-03 15:32:35 +03:00
Osama Sayegh ce9eec8606
DEV: Combine all header notification bubbles into one in the new user menu (#17718)
Extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-08-03 08:57:59 +03:00
Osama Sayegh 9103081eb7
DEV: Add likes, mentions and replies tabs to the new user menu (#17623)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-07-25 15:19:53 +03:00
Roman Rizzi 1fc06520bd
REFACTOR: Improve support for consolidating notifications. (#14904)
* REFACTOR: Improve support for consolidating notifications.

Before this commit, we didn't have a single way of consolidating notifications. For notifications like group summaries, we manually removed old ones before creating a new one. On the other hand, we used an after_create callback for likes and group membership requests, which caused unnecessary work, as we need to delete the record we created to replace it with a consolidated one.

We now have all the consolidation rules centralized in a single place: the consolidation planner class. Other parts of the app looking to create a consolidable notification can do so by calling Notification#consolidate_or_save!, instead of the default Notification#create! method.

Finally, we added two more rules: one for re-using existing group summaries and another for deleting duplicated dashboard problems PMs notifications when the user is tracking the moderator's inbox. Setting the threshold to one forces the planner to apply this rule every time.

I plan to add plugin support for adding custom rules in another PR to keep this one relatively small.

* DEV: Introduces a plugin API for consolidating notifications.

This commit removes the `Notification#filter_by_consolidation_data` scope since plugins could have to define their criteria. The Plan class now receives two blocks, one to query for an already consolidated notification, which we'll try to update, and another to query for existing ones to consolidate.

It also receives a consolidation window, which accepts an ActiveSupport::Duration object, and filter notifications created since that value.
2021-11-30 13:36:14 -03:00
Guo Xiang Tan 16961dee76
FIX: Typo in `NotificationsController#index` not caught by tests. 2020-07-22 09:22:26 +08:00
Ahmed Gagan 04d7693355
FIX: Filter read/unread notifications on the server side (#10152)
https://meta.discourse.org/t/notifications-unread-only-filter/37621/32
2020-07-02 11:06:00 +01:00
Guo Xiang Tan 9c7d3b2dc0
FIX: Avoid marking notifications as seen in readonly mode. 2020-06-25 10:14:07 +08:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek 427d54b2b0 DEV: Upgrading Discourse to Zeitwerk (#8098)
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains. 

We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard 
Ruby patterns to require files.

This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
2019-10-02 14:01:53 +10:00
Sam Saffron 30990006a9 DEV: enable frozen string literal on all files
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.

Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
2019-05-13 09:31:32 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan ad5082d969 Make rubocop happy again. 2018-06-07 13:28:18 +08:00
Régis Hanol 5b2e7c8d10 fix the build 2018-05-26 03:11:10 +02:00
Guo Xiang Tan f9280617d0 Remove redundant comment. 2018-02-13 15:58:13 +08:00
Muhlis Cahyono cc3cf6588b FEATURE: Notification API Endpoints for Admins
* create/update/delete notification api with external url
* remove external url feature
* Fix Travis CI build error (add new line)
* Fix Travis CI build error
2018-02-13 01:38:26 -05:00
Sam 41986cdb2f Refactor requires login logic, reduce duplicate code
This also corrects the positioning in the chain of the check
and removes misuse of prepend_before_action
2018-02-01 15:17:59 +11:00
Sam f2e7b74d88 FIX: don't return 200s when login is required to paths
When running `ensure_login_required` it should always happen prior to
`check_xhr` cause check xhr will trigger a 200 response
2018-02-01 12:26:45 +11:00
Guo Xiang Tan 77d4c4d8dc Fix all the errors to get our tests green on Rails 5.1. 2017-09-25 13:48:58 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan 5012d46cbd Add rubocop to our build. (#5004) 2017-07-28 10:20:09 +09:00
Guo Xiang Tan 6f7c6b0fd0 FIX: Incorrect error raised. 2017-04-25 09:59:01 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan 9663a74445 FIX: Ensure `username` param is valid in `NotificationsController`. 2017-04-07 17:32:52 +08:00
Sam 75f3f7fcbd FEATURE: clean API method for reading a single notification 2016-09-16 16:14:15 +10:00
Sam 25a82e7d22 PERF: only publish notification state if we changed it
also publish seen_notification_id so we can tell what is new and what is old
cleanup controller so it correctly checks user
fix bug around clearing notification when people click mark read
2016-09-16 12:02:19 +10:00
Robin Ward 73dba5af38 FIX: Notifications when no limit is provided 2015-09-02 15:48:41 -04:00
Robin Ward e624b7198d Try to estimate the amount of notifications to return based on height 2015-09-02 14:30:18 -04:00
Robin Ward 9f50f70670 UX: Return more notifications in the user menu 2015-09-01 16:23:23 -04:00
Robin Ward 0b65c88003 Upgrade Notifications to fix deprecations and use store 2015-05-11 11:20:45 -04:00
Sam 67f404d281 FIX: remove notifications on deleted topics from the stream 2015-02-19 12:40:00 +11:00
Régis Hanol ec76be964e UX: better footer handling 2014-11-10 21:51:55 +01:00
cpradio 8f390c979b FEATURE: Mark All as Read button for Notifications page
Added a Mark All as Read button to the top/bottom of the notifications user page
https://meta.discourse.org/t/possibility-to-selectively-or-completely-mark-notifications-as-read/20227

Remove notifications property (no longer used)
2014-10-13 06:31:27 -04:00
riking 69bc552054 FEATURE: Actually show more notifications
The "Show more notifications..." link in the notifications dropdown now
links to /my/notifications, which is a historical view of all
notifications you have recieved.

Notification history is loaded in blocks of 60 at a time.

Admins can see others' notification history. (This was requested for
'debugging purposes', though that's what impersonation is for, IMO.)
2014-09-09 16:29:08 -07:00
Vikhyat Korrapati 9b89b1466f Allow reading notifications without marking them as read. 2014-06-17 23:34:04 +05:30
Sam 8c7363bdd5 BUGFIX: not clearing blue notifications correctly when you have a PM 2014-06-12 10:50:41 +10:00
Sam c0686a6dc6 BUGFIX: regression, not handling nil count for recent report 2014-02-14 07:21:19 +11:00
Sam e8aa85d783 FEATURE: unread pms go in front of notification report
also refactor fat controller
2014-02-13 17:27:50 +11:00
Stephan Kaag 0e3b8fbb24 Remove some calls to `all`. They are not required, and Rails4 raises warnings about them. 2013-07-22 20:44:11 +02:00
Sam 88417725b5 we need some, albeit hacky way of clearing these old pms, make at least some way of finding them 2013-05-16 17:30:30 +10:00
Robin Ward 21b5628528 Initial release of Discourse 2013-02-05 14:16:51 -05:00