* Do not grant badges for posts with no user
* Ensure instructions are correct in Change Owner modal
* Hide user-dependent actions from posts with no user
* Make PostRevisor work with posts with no user
* Ensure posts with no user can be deleted
* discourse-narrative-bot should ignore posts with no user
* Skip TopicLink creation for posts with no user
* Fix an issue where if an edit was made to a post with a reason provided, and then another edit was made with no reason, the original edit reason got wiped out
* We now always make a post revision (even with ninja edits) if an edit reason has been provided and it is different from the current edit reason
Co-Authored-By: Sam <sam.saffron@gmail.com>
Issue was mentioned in this [meta topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/send-a-notification-to-watching-users-when-adding-tag/125314)
It is working well when category is changed because NotifyCategoryChange job already got that code:
```
if post&.topic&.visible?
post_alerter = PostAlerter.new
post_alerter.notify_post_users(post, User.where(id: args[:notified_user_ids]))
post_alerter.notify_first_post_watchers(post, post_alerter.category_watchers(post.topic))
end
```
For NotifyTagChange job notify post users were missing so it worked only when your notification was set to `watching first post`
While editing the first post it does't bumped the topic when the new post revision created. Because we wrongly assumed that the hidden tags are changed even when no tags are updated.
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.
Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
Minor fixes to add Rails 6 support to Discourse, we now will boot
with RAILS_MASTER=1, all specs pass
Only one tiny deprecation left
Largest change was the way ActiveModel:Errors changed interface a
bit but there is a simple backwards compat way of working it
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.
Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Introduce new patterns for direct sql that are safe and fast.
MiniSql is not prone to memory bloat that can happen with direct PG usage.
It also has an extremely fast materializer and very a convenient API
- DB.exec(sql, *params) => runs sql returns row count
- DB.query(sql, *params) => runs sql returns usable objects (not a hash)
- DB.query_hash(sql, *params) => runs sql returns an array of hashes
- DB.query_single(sql, *params) => runs sql and returns a flat one dimensional array
- DB.build(sql) => returns a sql builder
See more at: https://github.com/discourse/mini_sql
* It stored only oneboxed "quotes" when [quote] and links to topics or posts were mixed.
* Revising a post didn't add or remove records from the quoted_posts table.
Why? Some edits by staff are not tracked. For example, during the grace
period, or via the flags/silence dialog.
If a staff member is editing someone else's post, it now goes into the
Staff Action Logs so it can be audited by other staff members.
We trust staff + tl2 and up to perform edits in grace period.
Allow them significantly more edit room in grace period prior to storing
a revision.
editing_grace_period_max_diff_high_trust applies to users with tl2 and up.
So
tl0 / 1 : we store an extra revision if more than 100 chars change
tl2 and up : we store an extra revision if more than 400 chars change
We may tweak these numbers as we go.
If a user performs a substantive edit of 20 chars or more during grace period
we will store a revision to track the change
This allows for better auditing of changes that happen during the grace period
Dan Ungureanu
Vinoth Kannan
Mark VanLandingham
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Martin Brennan
Krzysztof Kotlarek
David Taylor
Régis Hanol
Robin Ward
Bianca Nenciu
Neil Lalonde
Guo Xiang Tan
Sam Saffron
Tim Lange
Gerhard Schlager
Maja Komel
Penar Musaraj
Kyle Zhao