The `Composer - current time` test would sometimes fail due to a
1-second difference. We don't really need per-second fidelity here, the
key thing this needs to test is that the shortcut works and adds today's
date. I have updated the test to reflect that.
Ember CLI will automatically run babel transformations in parallel when the config is 'serializable', and can therefore be applied in multiple processes automatically. If any plugin is defined in an unserializable way, parallelisation will be disabled.
Our discourse-widget-hbs transformer was causing parallelisation to be disabled. This commit fixes that, and also enables the throwUnlessParallelizable flag so that we catch this kind of issue more easily in future.
This commit also refactors our deprecation silencing system into its own file, and uses a fake babel plugin to ensure deprecations are silenced in babel worker processes.
In our GitHub CI jobs, this doubles the speed of ember builds (1m30s -> 45s). It should also improve production deploy times, and cold-start dev builds.
This change only makes the model reflect correctly what's
already happening in the database. Note that there are no calls
to chat_message.chat_mention in Core and plugins so this
change should be safe.
Also note, that at the moment we use the chat_mentions db
table only to support notifications about mentions, but
we're going to start using it for other cases. This commit is
the first step in that direction.
When a user pauses a youtube video and scrolls up high enough to load
new posts, the video either rewinds or restarts depending on the browser.
The problem is solved by patching virtual-dom to handle element prepends
without reordering old elements.
Long-term, Discourse intends to move away from the vdom/widget implementation, so this is intended as a short-term solution. More context at https://meta.discourse.org/t/57692
Co-authored-by: David Taylor <david@taylorhq.com>
This bug is actually a Drupal issue where some edited posts have their `created` and `changed` timestamps set to the same value. But even when that happens in Drupal it still maintains the correct post order in an affected thread. This PR makes the Discourse importer also maintain the original Drupal comment order by sorting comments in the source DB by their `cid`, which is sequential and never changes. More details from this post onward:
https://meta.discourse.org/t/large-drupal-forum-migration-importer-errors-and-limitations/246939/24?u=rahim123
Remove the per user groups based site setting in favor of a global site setting as we want to roll the glimmer topic timeline out to anon users as well as site users.
- Add `enable_experimental_topic_timeline` site setting
- Remove `enable_experimental_topic_timeline_groups` site setting
When a post is created using the API and goes into the review queue, we
would return a 'null' string in the response which isn't valid JSON.
Internal ref: /t/92419
Co-authored-by: Leonardo Mosquera <ldmosquera@gmail.com>
Improvements for this PR: https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/20057
What was fixed:
- [x] Use ember transitions instead of full reload
- [x] Link was inaccurately kept active
- [x] "+ save" renamed to just "save"
- [x] Render emojis in link name
- [x] UI to set icon
- [x] Delete link is trash icon instead of "x"
- [x] Add another link to on the left and rewording
- [x] Raname "link name" -> "name", "points to" -> link
- [x] Add limits to fields
- [x] Move add section button to the bottom
Whenever we create a chat message that is `in_reply_to` another
message, we want to lazily populate the thread record for the
message chain.
If there is no thread yet for the root message in the reply chain,
we create a new thread with the appropriate details, and use that
thread ID for every message in the chain that does not yet have
a thread ID.
* Root message (ID 1) - no thread ID
* Message (ID 2, in_reply_to 1) - no thread ID
* When I as a user create a message in reply to ID 2, we create a thread and apply it to ID 1, ID 2, and the new message
If there is a thread for the root message in the reply chain, we
do not create one, and use the thread ID for the newly created chat
message.
* Root message (ID 1) - thread ID 700
* Message (ID 2, in_reply_to 1) - thread ID 700
* When I as a user create a message in reply to ID 2, we use the existing thread ID 700 for the new message
We also support passing in the `thread_id` to `ChatMessageCreator`,
which will be used when replying to a message that is already part of
a thread, and we validate whether that `thread_id` is okay in the context
of the channel and also the reply chain.
This work is always done, regardless of channel `thread_enabled` settings
or the `enable_experimental_chat_threaded_discussions` site setting.
This commit does not include a large data migration to backfill threads for
all existing reply chains, its unnecessary to do this so early in the project,
we can do this later if necessary.
This commit also includes thread considerations in the `MessageMover` class:
* If the original message and N other messages of a thread is moved,
the remaining messages in the thread have a new thread created in
the old channel and are moved to it.
* The reply chain is not preserved for moved messages, so new threads are
not created in the destination channel.
In addition to this, I added a fix to also clear the `in_reply_to_id` of messages
in the old channel which are moved out of that channel for data cleanliness.
Whenever we create a chat message that is `in_reply_to` another
message, we want to lazily populate the thread record for the
message chain.
If there is no thread yet for the root message in the reply chain,
we create a new thread with the appropriate details, and use that
thread ID for every message in the chain that does not yet have
a thread ID.
* Root message (ID 1) - no thread ID
* Message (ID 2, in_reply_to 1) - no thread ID
* When I as a user create a message in reply to ID 2, we create a thread and apply it to ID 1, ID 2, and the new message
If there is a thread for the root message in the reply chain, we
do not create one, and use the thread ID for the newly created chat
message.
* Root message (ID 1) - thread ID 700
* Message (ID 2, in_reply_to 1) - thread ID 700
* When I as a user create a message in reply to ID 2, we use the existing thread ID 700 for the new message
We also support passing in the `thread_id` to `ChatMessageCreator`,
which will be used when replying to a message that is already part of
a thread, and we validate whether that `thread_id` is okay in the context
of the channel and also the reply chain.
This work is always done, regardless of channel `thread_enabled` settings
or the `enable_experimental_chat_threaded_discussions` site setting.
This commit does not include a large data migration to backfill threads for
all existing reply chains, its unnecessary to do this so early in the project,
we can do this later if necessary.
This commit also includes thread considerations in the `MessageMover` class:
* If the original message and N other messages of a thread is moved,
the remaining messages in the thread have a new thread created in
the old channel and are moved to it.
* The reply chain is not preserved for moved messages, so new threads are
not created in the destination channel.
In addition to this, I added a fix to also clear the `in_reply_to_id` of messages
in the old channel which are moved out of that channel for data cleanliness.
UI is not modified much besides removing the border-bottom, and using only message body.
However instead of having a fix template, this is all automatically generated and random, resulting in a more natural experience.
Only the header's height and 15px spacing are removed from the height of the viewport.
Previously it was limited to 90vh and there was also a useless property on a child node limiting it to 85vh. We now use only one property.
This PR is a major change to Sass compilation in Discourse.
The new version of sass-ruby moves to dart-sass putting we back on the supported version of Sass. It does so while keeping compatibility with the existing method signatures, so minimal change is needed in Discourse for this change.
This moves us
From:
- sassc 2.0.1 (Feb 2019)
- libsass 3.5.2 (May 2018)
To:
- dart-sass 1.58
This update applies the following breaking changes:
>
> These breaking changes are coming soon or have recently been released:
>
> [Functions are stricter about which units they allow](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/breaking-changes/function-units) beginning in Dart Sass 1.32.0.
>
> [Selectors with invalid combinators are invalid](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/breaking-changes/bogus-combinators) beginning in Dart Sass 1.54.0.
>
> [/ is changing from a division operation to a list separator](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/breaking-changes/slash-div) beginning in Dart Sass 1.33.0.
>
> [Parsing the special syntax of @-moz-document will be invalid](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/breaking-changes/moz-document) beginning in Dart Sass 1.7.2.
>
> [Compound selectors could not be extended](https://sass-lang.com/documentation/breaking-changes/extend-compound) in Dart Sass 1.0.0 and Ruby Sass 4.0.0.
SCSS files have been migrated automatically using `sass-migrator division app/assets/stylesheets/**/*.scss`
Prior to this fix on mobile the card-cloak would not get removed if the user/group card was leading to a non existing user/group.
The fix ensures hidden class is removed each time we call show.
Gerhard Schlager
Kris
Penar Musaraj
chapoi
dependabot[bot]
Jan Cernik
Martin Brennan
Krzysztof Kotlarek
Keegan George
David Taylor
Andrei Prigorshnev
Aleksey Bogdanov
GeckoLinux
Isaac Janzen
Régis Hanol
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Sérgio Saquetim
Rafael dos Santos Silva
Discourse Translator Bot
