Commit Graph

108 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sérgio Saquetim 21ec70b509
FIX: Miscellaneous tagging errors (#21490)
* FIX: Displaying the wrong number of minimum tags in the composer

When the minimum number of tags set for the category is larger than the minimum number of tags
set in the category tag-groups, the composer was displaying the wrong value.

This commit fixes the value displayed in the composer to show the max value between the required
for the category and the tag-groups set for the category.

This bug was reported on Meta in https://meta.discourse.org/t/tags-from-multiple-tag-groups-required-only-suggest-select-at-least-one-tag/263817

* FIX: Limiting tags in categories not working as expected

When a category was restricted to a tag group A, which was set to only allow
one tag from the group per topic, selecting a tag belonging only to A returned
other tags from A that also belonged to other group/s (if any).

Example:

Tag group A: alpha, beta, gamma, epsilon, delta
Tag group B: alpha, beta, gamma

Both tag groups set to only allow one tag from the group per topic.

If Category 1 was set to only allow tags from the tag group A, and the first tag
selected was epsilon, then, because they also belonged to tag group B, the tags
alpha, beta, and gamma were still returned as valid options when they should not be.

This commit ensures that once a tag from a tag group that restricts its tags to
one per topic is selected, no other tag from this group is returned.

This bug was reported on Meta in https://meta.discourse.org/t/limiting-tags-to-categories-not-working-as-expected/263143.

* FIX: Moving topics does not prompt to add required tag for new category

When a topic moved from a category to another, the tag requirements
of the new category were not being checked.

This allowed a topic to be created and moved to a category:

- that limited the tags to a tag group, with the topic containing tags
not allowed.
- that required N tags from a tag group, with the topic not containing
the required tags.

This bug was reported on Meta in https://meta.discourse.org/t/moving-tagged-topics-does-not-prompt-to-add-required-tag-for-new-category/264138.

* FIX: Editing topics with tag groups from parents allows incorrect tagging

When there was a combination between parent tags defined in a tag group
set to allow only one tag from the group per topic, and other tag groups
relying on this restriction to combine the children tag types with the
parent tag, editing a topic could allow the user to insert an invalid
combination of these tags.

Example:

Automakers tag group: landhover, toyota
  - group set to limit one tag from the group per topic

Toyota models group: land-cruiser, hilux, corolla

Landhover models group: evoque, defender, discovery

If a topic was initially set up with the tags toyota, land-cruiser it was
possible to edit it by removing the tag toyota and adding the tag landhover
and other landhover model tags like evoque for example.

In this case, the topic would end up with the tags toyota, land-cruiser,
landhover, evoque because Discourse will automatically insert the
missing parent tag toyota when it detects the tag land-cruiser.

This combination of tags would violate the restriction specified in
the Automakers tag group resulting in an invalid combination of tags.

This commit enforces that the "one tag from the group per topic"
restriction is verified before updating the topic tags and also
make sure the verification checks the compatibility of parent tags that
would be automatically inserted.

After the changes, the user will receive an error similar to:
The tags land-cruiser, landhover cannot be used simultaneously.
Please include only one of them.
2023-05-15 17:19:41 -03:00
Daniel Waterworth 666536cbd1
DEV: Prefer \A and \z over ^ and $ in regexes (#19936) 2023-01-20 12:52:49 -06:00
David Taylor 6417173082
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `lib/*` 2023-01-09 12:10:19 +00:00
Selase Krakani 0ce38bd7bc
SECURITY: Restrict unlisted topic creation (#19259) 2022-12-01 10:26:35 +00:00
Selase Krakani 862007fb18
FEATURE: Add support for case-sensitive Watched Words (#17445)
* FEATURE: Add case-sensitivity flag to watched_words

Currently, all watched words are matched case-insensitively. This flag
allows a watched word to be flagged for case-sensitive matching.
To allow allow for backwards compatibility the flag is set to false by
default.

* FEATURE: Support case-sensitive creation of Watched Words via API

Extend admin creation and upload of Watched Words to support case
sensitive flag. This lays the ground work for supporting
case-insensitive matching of Watched Words.

Support for an extra column has also been introduced for the Watched
Words upload CSV file. The new column structure is as follows:

 word,replacement,case_sentive

* FEATURE: Enable case-sensitive matching of Watched Words

WordWatcher's word_matcher_regexp now returns a list of regular
expressions instead of one case-insensitive regular expression.

With the ability to flag a Watched Word as case-sensitive, an action
can have words of both sensitivities.This makes the use of the global
Regexp::IGNORECASE flag added to all words problematic.

To get around platform limitations around the use of subexpression level
switches/flags, a list of regular expressions is returned instead, one for each
case sensitivity.

Word matching has also been updated to use this list of regular expressions
instead of one.

* FEATURE: Use case-sensitive regular expressions for Watched Words

Update Watched Words regular expressions matching and processing to handle
the extra metadata which comes along with the introduction of
case-sensitive Watched Words.

This allows case-sensitive Watched Words to matched as such.

* DEV: Simplify type casting of case-sensitive flag from uploads

Use builtin semantics instead of a custom method for converting
string case flags in uploaded Watched Words to boolean.

* UX: Add case-sensitivity details to Admin Watched Words UI

Update Watched Word form to include a toggle for case-sensitivity.
This also adds support for, case-sensitive testing and matching of  Watched Word
in the admin UI.

* DEV: Code improvements from review feedback

 - Extract watched word regex creation out to a utility function
 - Make JS array presence check more explicit and readable

* DEV: Extract Watched Word regex creation to utility function

Clean-up work from review feedback. Reduce code duplication.

* DEV: Rename word_matcher_regexp to word_matcher_regexp_list

Since a list is returned now instead of a single regular expression,
change `word_matcher_regexp` to `word_matcher_regexp_list` to better communicate
this change.

* DEV:  Incorporate WordWatcher updates from upstream

Resolve conflicts and ensure apply_to_text does not remove non-word characters in matches
that aren't at the beginning of the line.
2022-08-02 10:06:03 +02:00
Osama Sayegh e40c4bb7f9
FIX: Validate category tag restrictions before sending new topics to review (#16292)
Tags (and tag groups) can be configured so that they can only be used in specific categories and (optionally) restrict topics in these categories to be able to add/use only these tags. These restrictions work as expected when a topic is created without going through the review queue; however, if the topic has to be reviewed by a moderator then these restrictions currently aren't checked before the topic is sent to the review queue, but they're checked later when a moderator tries to approve the topic. This is because if a user manages to submit a topic that doesn't meet the restrictions, moderators won't be able to approve and it'll be stuck in the review queue.

This PR prevents topics that don't meet the tags requirements from being sent to the review queue and shows the poster an error message that indicates which tags that cannot be used.

Internal ticket: t60562.
2022-03-28 21:25:26 +03:00
Bianca Nenciu f704deca17
FIX: Clear drafts only when post is created by real user (#15720)
This commits adds a new advance_draft to PostCreator that controls if
the draft sequence will be advanced or not. If the draft sequence is
advanced then the old drafts will be cleared. This used to happen for
posts created by plugins or through the API and cleared user drafts
by mistake.
2022-02-09 10:37:38 +02:00
Blake Erickson 71f7f7ed49
FEATURE: Add external_id to topics (#15825)
* FEATURE: Add external_id to topics

This commit allows for topics to be created and fetched by an
external_id. These changes are API only for now as there aren't any
front changes.

* add annotations

* add external_id to this spec

* Several PR feedback changes

- Add guardian to find topic
- 403 is returned for not found as well now
- add `include_external_id?`
- external_id is now case insensitive
- added test for posts_controller
- added test for topic creator
- created constant for max length
- check that it redirects to the correct path
- restrain external id in routes file

* remove puts

* fix tests

* only check for external_id in webhook if exists

* Update index to exclude external_id if null

* annotate

* Update app/controllers/topics_controller.rb

We need to check whether the topic is present first before passing it to the guardian.

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
2022-02-08 20:55:32 -07:00
Vinoth Kannan a2851b5d4c
FIX: include new tags in validation if user can create one. (#14744)
Previously, users who have enough trust level are unable to create topics with new tags if the selected category required a minimum number of tags.
2021-10-28 11:59:46 +05:30
Andrei Prigorshnev 0c0a11b66a
FEATURE: Disallow putting urls in the title for TL-0 users (#13947)
This disallows putting URLs in topic titles for TL0 users, which means that:

If a TL-0 user puts a link into the title, a topic featured link won't be generated (as if it was disabled in the site settings)
Server methods for creating and updating topics will be refusing featured links when they are called by TL-0 users
TL-0 users won't be able to put any link into the topic title. For example, the title "Hey, take a look at https://my-site.com" will be rejected.

Also, it improves a bit server behavior when creating or updating feature links on topics in the categories with disabled featured links. Before the server just silently ignored a featured link field that was passed to him, now it will be returning 422 response.
2021-08-05 13:38:39 +04:00
Bianca Nenciu 3a1b05f219
FIX: Make autotag watched words case insensitive (#13043)
* FIX: Hide tag watched words if tagging is disabled

These 'autotag' words were shown even if tagging was disabled.

* FIX: Make autotag watched words case insensitive

This commit also fixes the bug when no tag was applied if no other tag
was already present.
2021-05-14 16:52:10 +03:00
Bianca Nenciu 8c4a11c006
DEV: Move autotag to topic creator (#12790)
This move was necessary to automatically tag the topic with the right
tags from creation time. The process post job may be delayed for a
short time.
2021-04-23 16:55:34 +03:00
Martin Brennan e3b1f5721b
FIX: Enforce tag group count validation before sending to review queue (#12728)
There is a category setting that enforces 1 or more tags must be added to a topic from a specific tag group before creating it. This validation was not being run before the topic was being sent to a review queue for categories that have that setting enabled.

There was an existing validation in `TopicCreator` but it was not correct; it was only validating when the tags did _not_ exist and also only happened on `create`. I now run the validation in `TopicCreator.valid?`

I also improved the error message shown to the user when they have not added the tags required (showing the tag names from the tag group), and changed the composer tag selector to not show "optional" if there are N tags required from a certain group.
2021-04-19 09:43:50 +10:00
Bianca Nenciu 52a5c7e438
FIX: Improve error messages if user cannot send PM emails (#12547) 2021-03-30 12:18:57 +03:00
Roman Rizzi b45a30c40f
FIX: Users without shared drafts access can still have access to the category. (#11476)
This is an edge-case of 9fb3629. An admin could set the shared draft category to one where both TL2 and TL3 users have access but only give shared draft access to TL3 users. If something like this happens, we need to make sure that TL2 users won't be able to see them, and they won't be listed on latest.

Before this change, `SharedDrafts` were lazily created when a destination category was selected. We now create it alongside the topic and set the destination to the same shared draft category.
2020-12-14 16:08:20 -03:00
jbrw a1918801a4
FIX - downcase strings consistently (#10861)
ruby and postgres can treat certain characters differently when downcasing them. So do all the downcasing in ruby so that we get consistent results.
2020-10-08 11:28:07 +11:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek d260e42c8a
FIX: topic_creator accepts participant_count in import mode (#10632)
The issue mentioned here: https://meta.discourse.org/t/imported-private-discussion-doesnt-appear-in-the-author-inbox/163252

`participant_count` is important to attribute for private messages. If they are imported, we should allow them to set that attribute.

A workaround would be evaluating `update_statistics` method on each Topic but that is less performant.
2020-09-10 08:16:57 +10:00
Blake Erickson 2032c11f78
FIX: Return 422 when creating topics with tags w/out permission (#10400)
The UI prevents users from trying to create tags on topics when they
don't have permission, but if you are trying to add tags to a topic via
the API and you don't have permission before this change it would
silently succeed in creating the topic, but it wouldn't have any tags.

Now a 422 error will be returned with an error message when trying to
create a topic with tags when tagging is disabled or you don't have
enough trust level to add tags to a topic.

Bug report: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/70525/14
2020-08-10 16:14:15 -06:00
Blake Erickson 6548cd1a96 FIX: sending messages to groups with non-lowercase names
Fixes a regression in

e8fb9d4066

which caused a bug where you couldn't send a message to a group that
contained an Uppercase letter. Added a test case for this.

Bug report: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/152999
2020-05-27 14:52:08 -06:00
Arpit Jalan e8fb9d4066 FIX: when creating new PM username/groupname should be case-insensitive
(take 2)

https://meta.discourse.org/t/case-sensitivity-in-links-to-groupname/147596
https://meta.discourse.org/t/remove-case-sensitive-in-adding-users-to-a-message/151275
2020-05-25 21:34:05 +05:30
Arpit Jalan 302b37c805 Revert "FIX: when creating new PM username/groupname should be case-insensitive"
This reverts commit 2be79d94f5.

This is affecting multiple code path. Investigating.
2020-05-25 20:10:14 +05:30
Arpit Jalan 30849c8b37 FIX: no need for downcasing second time 2020-05-25 19:20:15 +05:30
Arpit Jalan 2be79d94f5 FIX: when creating new PM username/groupname should be case-insensitive
https://meta.discourse.org/t/case-sensitivity-in-links-to-groupname/147596
https://meta.discourse.org/t/remove-case-sensitive-in-adding-users-to-a-message/151275
2020-05-25 19:04:59 +05:30
Jarek Radosz aec26ad2f0
FIX: Preserve TopicCreator's timestamp resolution (#9158)
Continuation of #9140 (e35bc8b). It's the last piece required for #9141.
2020-03-10 15:35:40 +01:00
Régis Hanol 13d4b05963 FIX: allow both meta_data and custom_fields when creating a topic
For some reasons, we have two ways of associating "custom fields" to a new topic:
using 'meta_data' and 'custom_fields'.

However, if we were to provide both arguments, the 'meta_data' would be overwritten
by any 'custom_fields' provided.

This commit ensures we can use both and merges the 'custom_fields' with the 'meta_data'.
2020-02-05 10:40:22 +01:00
Martin Brennan c84652eb8b Get rid of no longer needed target_usernames warning log 2020-01-30 12:30:11 +10:00
Martin Brennan 88e23d4cfa Change logger.debug to logger.warn for PM debug messages 2020-01-21 16:11:52 +10:00
Martin Brennan c677f8ee6a
DEV: Add debug lines for mystery no_user_selected error (#8759)
On some customer forums we are randomly getting a "You must select a valid user" error when sending a PM even when all parameters seem to be OK. This is an attempt to track it down with more data.
2020-01-21 10:50:44 +10:00
Neil Lalonde d777844ed6 FEATURE: categories can require topics have a tag from a tag group
In a category's settings, the Tags tab has two new fields to
specify the number of tags that must be added to a topic
from a tag group. When creating a new topic, an error will be
shown to the user if the requirement isn't met.
2019-10-31 16:10:19 -04:00
Krzysztof Kotlarek 427d54b2b0 DEV: Upgrading Discourse to Zeitwerk (#8098)
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains. 

We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard 
Ruby patterns to require files.

This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
2019-10-02 14:01:53 +10:00
Sam Saffron 9a9e31f927 FIX: properly set notification levels on group invite
Previously we relied on side effects to set tracking state correctly
when inviting groups to messages

Also has a minor optimisation in that we use pluck instead of pulling in
full record
2019-08-16 18:23:51 +10:00
Blake Erickson 373b8a2139 FIX: Consistently handle category param
See https://meta.discourse.org/t/api-post-to-posts-json-inconsistent-between-users/118571
for more info.

This commit removes a 5 year old temporary fix that is no longer needed.

bc1824a6ed (diff-d8c648926664f849aec050757bfcb6f9R72)

The web interface uses category_id when creating a topic so I think we
should unify on category_id when using the api.
2019-05-27 16:39:56 +08:00
Dan Ungureanu da39d66e83
DEV: Improve support for plugins. (#7332)
* DEV: Allow NewPostManager handlers handle PMs.
* DEV: Add custom fields topic option to PostCreator.
* DEV: Add topic_id to serializer data.
* DEV: Wrap topic title from notification item in a span.
2019-05-25 16:53:03 +03:00
Sam Saffron 30990006a9 DEV: enable frozen string literal on all files
This reduces chances of errors where consumers of strings mutate inputs
and reduces memory usage of the app.

Test suite passes now, but there may be some stuff left, so we will run
a few sites on a branch prior to merging
2019-05-13 09:31:32 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan ce15f085c6 DEV: Return the right response code and error message.
Follow up to d1dbafebbc.

Also remove test that is a duplicate of
867c1a5ac9.
2019-05-10 07:33:02 +08:00
Blake Erickson ccc1e85bf4 REFACTOR: Shorten up category param check
Follow up to d1dbafebbc
2019-05-09 14:35:36 -06:00
Blake Erickson d1dbafebbc FIX: Return error if new topic category not found take 2
If creating a topic via the api as an admin and the category you specify
cannot be found an error will now be returned instead of just creating
the topic with no category. This will prevent accidental public topic
creation originally intended for a private category.

This commit is follow up to 535c594891 and
still allows for the creation of topics where the category param is
blank.
2019-05-09 11:27:45 -06:00
Guo Xiang Tan 742decc2a1 PERF: Avoid looking up the same category twice in `TopicCreator`. 2019-05-09 14:53:13 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan 535c594891 Revert "FIX: Return error if new topic category not found"
This reverts commit 9c606dd99a.
2019-05-09 14:53:13 +08:00
Blake Erickson 9c606dd99a FIX: Return error if new topic category not found
If creating a topic via the api as an admin and the category you specify
cannot be found an error will now be returned instead of just creating
the topic with no category. This will prevent accidental public topic
creation originally intended for a private category.
2019-05-08 15:02:00 -06:00
Guo Xiang Tan 152238b4cf DEV: Prefer `public_send` over `send`. 2019-05-07 09:33:21 +08:00
Sam Saffron 1be01f8dd4 DEV: Add support for Rails 6
Minor fixes to add Rails 6 support to Discourse, we now will boot
with RAILS_MASTER=1, all specs pass

Only one tiny deprecation left

Largest change was the way ActiveModel:Errors changed interface a
bit but there is a simple backwards compat way of working it
2019-05-02 16:23:25 +10:00
Robin Ward b58867b6e9 FEATURE: New 'Reviewable' model to make reviewable items generic
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.

Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
2019-03-28 12:45:10 -04:00
Arpit Jalan 7ce2d20951 fix the build 2019-01-24 17:22:17 +05:30
Arpit Jalan fabeba788d
FIX: allow sending PMs to staff via flag even when PMs are disabled (#6938)
* FIX: allow sending PMs to staff via flag even when PMs are disabled
FIX: allow sending PMs to staff via flag even if the user trust level is insufficient

* Update lib/topic_creator.rb

Co-Authored-By: techAPJ <arpit@techapj.com>
2019-01-24 16:56:59 +05:30
Sam e17d0c0526 FIX: don't double add users to topic allowed users
In latest rails building the same relation twice results in an error
Previous versions would deduplicate
2018-12-10 14:45:02 +11:00
Sam 4205c528d0 FEATURE: hide enable_personal_email_messages and min_trust_to_send_email_messages
These site settings are very hard to explain and only applicable for very
specific Discourse setups.

If an admin "enables staged users" which is used in support scenarios then
all staff can send "messages" directly to an "email".

The setting allows you to extend this to TL4 or any trust level.

Actual use case would be a support type setup with restricted staff. It is
quite rare so hiding this for now and re-evaluate keeping the setting in
2019
2018-08-27 11:38:22 +10:00
Arpit Jalan 48d43b33cc add client side validation for category minimum_required_tags 2018-04-11 07:17:52 +05:30
Arpit Jalan 9ca6ebe8fe FEATURE: enforce tagging on categories 2018-04-11 07:15:24 +05:30
Robin Ward b9abd7dc9e FEATURE: Shared Drafts
This feature can be enabled by choosing a destination for the
`shared drafts category` site setting.

* Staff members can create shared drafts, choosing a destination
category for the topic when it is published.

* Shared Drafts can be viewed in their category, or above the
topic list for the destination category where it will end up.

* When the shared draft is ready, it can be published to the
appropriate category by clicking a button on the topic view.

* When published, Drafts change their timestamps to the current
time, and any edits to the original post are removed.
2018-03-20 17:15:26 -04:00