HHH-13357 Fix OffsetDateTime ending up with a different offset than the JVM default when loading from a Timestamp

This bug only affects users that override the type descriptor for
OffsetDateTime, and only affects reading.

Since I had to change how we extract the local time from the timestamp,
I also took this opportunity to apply the fix for HHH-13266,
which should make data loading more resilient when databases contain
weird values representing time, like 1650-04-15T14:45:49 or
0000-00-00T14:45:49.

(cherry picked from commit 0f4c7ec0f2)
This commit is contained in:
Yoann Rodière 2019-04-16 09:01:06 +02:00 committed by gbadner
parent 7756af7ed2
commit 3bf81fb066
1 changed files with 33 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import java.time.Instant;
import java.time.LocalDate;
import java.time.OffsetDateTime;
import java.time.OffsetTime;
import java.time.ZoneId;
import java.time.ZoneOffset;
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
import java.util.Calendar;
import java.util.Date;
@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ public class OffsetTimeJavaDescriptor extends AbstractTypeDescriptor<OffsetTime>
final ZonedDateTime zonedDateTime = offsetTime.atDate( LocalDate.of( 1970, 1, 1 ) ).toZonedDateTime();
if ( Timestamp.class.isAssignableFrom( type ) ) {
/*
* Workaround for HHH-13266 (JDK-8061577).
* Ideally we'd want to use Timestamp.from( offsetDateTime.toInstant() ), but this won't always work.
* Timestamp.from() assumes the number of milliseconds since the epoch
* means the same thing in Timestamp and Instant, but it doesn't, in particular before 1900.
*/
return (X) Timestamp.valueOf( zonedDateTime.toLocalDateTime() );
}
@ -95,22 +101,44 @@ public class OffsetTimeJavaDescriptor extends AbstractTypeDescriptor<OffsetTime>
return (OffsetTime) value;
}
/*
* Also, in order to fix HHH-13357, and to be consistent with the conversion to Time (see above),
* we set the offset to the current offset of the JVM (OffsetDateTime.now().getOffset()).
* This is different from setting the *zone* to the current *zone* of the JVM (ZoneId.systemDefault()),
* since a zone has a varying offset over time,
* thus the zone might have a different offset for the given timezone than it has for the current date/time.
* For example, if the timestamp represents 1970-01-01TXX:YY,
* and the JVM is set to use Europe/Paris as a timezone, and the current time is 2019-04-16-08:53,
* then applying the JVM timezone to the timestamp would result in the offset +01:00,
* but applying the JVM offset would result in the offset +02:00, since DST is in effect at 2019-04-16-08:53.
*
* Of course none of this would be a problem if we just stored the offset in the database,
* but I guess there are historical reasons that explain why we don't.
*/
ZoneOffset offset = OffsetDateTime.now().getOffset();
if ( Time.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
return ( (Time) value ).toLocalTime().atOffset( OffsetDateTime.now().getOffset() );
return ( (Time) value ).toLocalTime().atOffset( offset );
}
if ( Timestamp.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
final Timestamp ts = (Timestamp) value;
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( ts.toInstant(), ZoneId.systemDefault() );
/*
* Workaround for HHH-13266 (JDK-8061577).
* Ideally we'd want to use OffsetDateTime.ofInstant( ts.toInstant(), ... ), but this won't always work.
* ts.toInstant() assumes the number of milliseconds since the epoch
* means the same thing in Timestamp and Instant, but it doesn't, in particular before 1900.
*/
return ts.toLocalDateTime().toLocalTime().atOffset( offset );
}
if ( Date.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
final Date date = (Date) value;
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( date.toInstant(), ZoneId.systemDefault() );
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( date.toInstant(), offset );
}
if ( Long.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( Instant.ofEpochMilli( (Long) value ), ZoneId.systemDefault() );
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( Instant.ofEpochMilli( (Long) value ), offset );
}
if ( Calendar.class.isInstance( value ) ) {