HHH-13357 Fix OffsetDateTime ending up with a different offset than the JVM default when loading from a Timestamp
This bug only affects users that override the type descriptor for
OffsetDateTime, and only affects reading.
Since I had to change how we extract the local time from the timestamp,
I also took this opportunity to apply the fix for HHH-13266,
which should make data loading more resilient when databases contain
weird values representing time, like 1650-04-15T14:45:49 or
0000-00-00T14:45:49.
(cherry picked from commit 0f4c7ec0f2
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
7756af7ed2
commit
3bf81fb066
|
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import java.time.Instant;
|
||||||
import java.time.LocalDate;
|
import java.time.LocalDate;
|
||||||
import java.time.OffsetDateTime;
|
import java.time.OffsetDateTime;
|
||||||
import java.time.OffsetTime;
|
import java.time.OffsetTime;
|
||||||
import java.time.ZoneId;
|
import java.time.ZoneOffset;
|
||||||
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
|
import java.time.ZonedDateTime;
|
||||||
import java.util.Calendar;
|
import java.util.Calendar;
|
||||||
import java.util.Date;
|
import java.util.Date;
|
||||||
|
@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ public class OffsetTimeJavaDescriptor extends AbstractTypeDescriptor<OffsetTime>
|
||||||
final ZonedDateTime zonedDateTime = offsetTime.atDate( LocalDate.of( 1970, 1, 1 ) ).toZonedDateTime();
|
final ZonedDateTime zonedDateTime = offsetTime.atDate( LocalDate.of( 1970, 1, 1 ) ).toZonedDateTime();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( Timestamp.class.isAssignableFrom( type ) ) {
|
if ( Timestamp.class.isAssignableFrom( type ) ) {
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Workaround for HHH-13266 (JDK-8061577).
|
||||||
|
* Ideally we'd want to use Timestamp.from( offsetDateTime.toInstant() ), but this won't always work.
|
||||||
|
* Timestamp.from() assumes the number of milliseconds since the epoch
|
||||||
|
* means the same thing in Timestamp and Instant, but it doesn't, in particular before 1900.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
return (X) Timestamp.valueOf( zonedDateTime.toLocalDateTime() );
|
return (X) Timestamp.valueOf( zonedDateTime.toLocalDateTime() );
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -95,22 +101,44 @@ public class OffsetTimeJavaDescriptor extends AbstractTypeDescriptor<OffsetTime>
|
||||||
return (OffsetTime) value;
|
return (OffsetTime) value;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Also, in order to fix HHH-13357, and to be consistent with the conversion to Time (see above),
|
||||||
|
* we set the offset to the current offset of the JVM (OffsetDateTime.now().getOffset()).
|
||||||
|
* This is different from setting the *zone* to the current *zone* of the JVM (ZoneId.systemDefault()),
|
||||||
|
* since a zone has a varying offset over time,
|
||||||
|
* thus the zone might have a different offset for the given timezone than it has for the current date/time.
|
||||||
|
* For example, if the timestamp represents 1970-01-01TXX:YY,
|
||||||
|
* and the JVM is set to use Europe/Paris as a timezone, and the current time is 2019-04-16-08:53,
|
||||||
|
* then applying the JVM timezone to the timestamp would result in the offset +01:00,
|
||||||
|
* but applying the JVM offset would result in the offset +02:00, since DST is in effect at 2019-04-16-08:53.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Of course none of this would be a problem if we just stored the offset in the database,
|
||||||
|
* but I guess there are historical reasons that explain why we don't.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
ZoneOffset offset = OffsetDateTime.now().getOffset();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( Time.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
if ( Time.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
||||||
return ( (Time) value ).toLocalTime().atOffset( OffsetDateTime.now().getOffset() );
|
return ( (Time) value ).toLocalTime().atOffset( offset );
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( Timestamp.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
if ( Timestamp.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
||||||
final Timestamp ts = (Timestamp) value;
|
final Timestamp ts = (Timestamp) value;
|
||||||
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( ts.toInstant(), ZoneId.systemDefault() );
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Workaround for HHH-13266 (JDK-8061577).
|
||||||
|
* Ideally we'd want to use OffsetDateTime.ofInstant( ts.toInstant(), ... ), but this won't always work.
|
||||||
|
* ts.toInstant() assumes the number of milliseconds since the epoch
|
||||||
|
* means the same thing in Timestamp and Instant, but it doesn't, in particular before 1900.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
return ts.toLocalDateTime().toLocalTime().atOffset( offset );
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( Date.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
if ( Date.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
||||||
final Date date = (Date) value;
|
final Date date = (Date) value;
|
||||||
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( date.toInstant(), ZoneId.systemDefault() );
|
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( date.toInstant(), offset );
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( Long.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
if ( Long.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
||||||
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( Instant.ofEpochMilli( (Long) value ), ZoneId.systemDefault() );
|
return OffsetTime.ofInstant( Instant.ofEpochMilli( (Long) value ), offset );
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ( Calendar.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
if ( Calendar.class.isInstance( value ) ) {
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue