doc multi-tenancy and naming strategies
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4539d9b44
commit
a498e4d501
|
@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
|
|||
[[advanced]]
|
||||
== Advanced Topics
|
||||
|
||||
In the last chapter of this Introduction, we turn to some topics that don't really belong in an introduction.
|
||||
Here we consider some problems, and solutions, that you're probably not going to run into immediately if you're new to Hibernate.
|
||||
But we do want you to know _about_ them, so that when the time comes, you'll know what tool to reach for.
|
||||
|
||||
[[filters]]
|
||||
=== Filters
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[multitenancy]]
|
||||
=== Multi-tenancy
|
||||
|
||||
A _multi-tenant_ database is one where the data is segregated by _tenant_.
|
||||
We don't need to actually define what a "tenant" really represents here; all we care about at this level of abstraction is that each tenant may be distinguished by a unique identifier.
|
||||
And that there's a well-defined _current tenant_ in each session.
|
||||
|
||||
We may specify the current tenant when we open a session:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
var session =
|
||||
sessionFactory.withOptions()
|
||||
.tenantIdentifier(tenantId)
|
||||
.openSession();
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
However, since we often don't have this level of control of creation of the session, it's more common to supply an implementation of `CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver` to Hibernate.
|
||||
|
||||
There are three common ways to implement multi-tenancy:
|
||||
|
||||
1. each tenant has its own database,
|
||||
2. each tenant has its own schema,
|
||||
3. tenants share tables in a single schema, and rows are tagged with the tenant id.
|
||||
|
||||
From the point of view of Hibernate, there's little difference between the first two options.
|
||||
Hibernate will need to obtain a JDBC connection with permissions on the database and schema owned by the current tenant.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, we must implement a `MultiTenantConnectionProvider` which takes on this responsibility:
|
||||
|
||||
- from time to time, Hibernate will ask for a connection, passing the id of the current tenant, and then we must create an appropriate connection or obtain one from a pool, and return it to Hibernate, and
|
||||
- later, Hibernate will release the connection and ask us to destroy it or return it to the appropriate pool.
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Check out `DataSourceBasedMultiTenantConnectionProviderImpl` for inspiration.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
The third option is quite different.
|
||||
In this case we don't need a `MultiTenantConnectionProvider`, but we will need a dedicated column holding the tenant id mapped by each of our entities.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Entity
|
||||
class Account {
|
||||
@Id String id;
|
||||
@TenantId String tenantId;
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `@TenantId` annotation is used to indicate an attribute of an entity which holds the tenant id.
|
||||
Within a given session, our data is automatically filtered so that only rows tagged with the tenant id of the current tenant are visible in that session.
|
||||
|
||||
[CAUTION]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Native SQL queries are _not_ automatically filtered by tenant id; you'll have to do that part yourself.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
.Multi-tenancy configuration
|
||||
[cols="35,~"]
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Configuration property name | Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
| `hibernate.tenant_identifier_resolver` | Specifies the `CurrentTenantIdentifierResolver`
|
||||
| `hibernate.multi_tenant_connection_provider` | Specifies the `MultiTenantConnectionProvider`
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[custom-sql]]
|
||||
=== Using custom-written SQL
|
||||
|
||||
[[database-generated-columns]]
|
||||
=== Handling database-generated columns
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[[naming-strategies]]
|
||||
=== Naming strategies
|
||||
|
||||
When working with a pre-existing relational schema, it's usual to find that the column and table naming conventions used in the schema don't match Java's naming conventions.
|
||||
|
||||
Of course, the `@Table` and `@Column` annotations let us explicitly specify a mapped table or column name.
|
||||
But we would prefer to avoid scattering these annotations across our whole domain model.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, Hibernate lets us define a mapping between Java naming conventions, and the naming conventions of the relational schema.
|
||||
Such a mapping is called a _naming strategy_.
|
||||
|
||||
First, we need to understand how Hibernate assigns and processes names.
|
||||
|
||||
- _Logical naming_ is the process of applying naming rules to determine the _logical names_ of objects which were not explicitly assigned names in the O/R mapping.
|
||||
That is, when there's no `@Table` or `@Column` annotation.
|
||||
- _Physical naming_ is the process of applying additional rules to transform a logical name into an actual "physical" name that will be used in the database.
|
||||
For example, the rules might include things like using standardized abbreviations, or trimming the length of identifiers.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, there's two flavors of naming strategy, with slightly different responsibilities.
|
||||
Hibernate comes with default implementations of these interfaces:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Flavor | Default implementation
|
||||
|
||||
| An `ImplicitNamingStrategy` is responsible for assigning a logical name when none is specified by an annotation
|
||||
| A default strategy which implements the rules defined by JPA
|
||||
| A `PhysicalNamingStrategy` is responsible for transforming a logical name and producing the name used in the database
|
||||
| A trivial implementation which does no processing
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
We happen to not much like the naming rules defined by JPA, which specify that mixed case and camel case identifiers should be concatenated using underscores.
|
||||
We bet you could easily come up with a much better `ImplicitNamingStrategy` than that!
|
||||
(Hint: it should always produce legit mixed case identifiers.)
|
||||
====
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
====
|
||||
A popular `PhysicalNamingStrategy` produces snake case identifiers.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
Custom naming strategies may be enabled using the configuration properties we already mentioned without much explanation back in <<minimizing>>.
|
||||
|
||||
.Naming strategy configuration
|
||||
[cols="35,~"]
|
||||
|===
|
||||
| Configuration property name | Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
| `hibernate.implicit_naming_strategy` | Specifies the `ImplicitNamingStrategy`
|
||||
| `hibernate.physical_naming_strategy` | Specifies the `PhysicalNamingStrategy`
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
[[spatial]]
|
||||
=== Spatial datatypes
|
|
@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ You can make the SQL logged to the console more readable by enabling formatting
|
|||
|
||||
These settings can really help when troubleshooting SQL.
|
||||
|
||||
[[minimizing]]
|
||||
=== Minimizing repetitive mapping information
|
||||
|
||||
The following properties are very useful for minimizing the amount of information you'll need to explicitly specify in `@Table` and `@Column` annotations, which we'll discuss below in <<object-relational-mapping>>:
|
||||
|
@ -384,17 +385,14 @@ The following properties are very useful for minimizing the amount of informatio
|
|||
| `hibernate.default_schema` | A default schema name for entities which do not explicitly declare one
|
||||
| `hibernate.default_catalog` | A default catalog name for entities which do not explicitly declare one
|
||||
| `hibernate.physical_naming_strategy` | A `PhysicalNamingStrategy` implementing your database naming standards
|
||||
| `hibernate.implicit_naming_strategy` | An `ImplicitNamingStrategy` which specifies how "logical" names of
|
||||
relational objects should be inferred when no name is specified in
|
||||
annotations
|
||||
| `hibernate.implicit_naming_strategy` | An `ImplicitNamingStrategy` which specifies how "logical" names of relational objects should be inferred when no name is specified in annotations
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
||||
[TIP]
|
||||
// .Implement your naming standards as a `PhysicalNamingStrategy`
|
||||
====
|
||||
Writing your own `PhysicalNamingStrategy` and/or `ImplicitNamingStrategy` is an especially good way to reduce the clutter of annotations on your entity classes, and to implement your database naming conventions, and so we think you should do it for any nontrivial data model.
|
||||
|
||||
Please refer to the Javadoc for these interfaces for more information about the division of responsibility between them.
|
||||
We'll have more to say about them in <<naming-strategies>>.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
||||
[[nationalized-chars]]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -35,7 +35,13 @@ include::Mapping.adoc[]
|
|||
|
||||
include::Interacting.adoc[]
|
||||
|
||||
// include::../userguide/chapters/query/hql/QueryLanguage.adoc[]
|
||||
|
||||
<<<
|
||||
|
||||
include::Tuning.adoc[]
|
||||
// include::../userguide/chapters/query/hql/QueryLanguage.adoc[]
|
||||
|
||||
<<<
|
||||
|
||||
include::Advanced.adoc[]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue