fix assertion that I believe to be incorrect at least on Postgres

I don't think that's how Postgres arrays actually work
This commit is contained in:
Gavin King 2024-12-23 13:06:17 +01:00
parent 2f914a4fa9
commit e006427920
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1521,7 +1521,7 @@ class Event {
}
----
The `@Array` annotation is optional, but it's important to limit the amount of storage space the database allocates to the `ARRAY` column.
The `@Array` annotation is optional--it lets us specify an upper bound on the length of the `ARRAY` column.
By writing `@Array(length=7)` here, we specified that DDL should be generated with the column type `TINYINT ARRAY[7]`.
Just for fun, we used an enumerated type in the code above, but the array element time may be almost any <<basic-type-list,basic type>>.