finish section on ids

This commit is contained in:
Gavin 2023-05-08 11:23:03 +02:00 committed by Christian Beikov
parent 2c2c061be7
commit e678018b6b
1 changed files with 226 additions and 23 deletions

View File

@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ An entity must:
- be a non-`final` class,
- with a non-`private` constructor with no parameters.
On the other hand, the entity class may be concrete or `abstract`, and it may have any number of additional constructors.
On the other hand, the entity class may be either concrete or `abstract`, and it may have any number of additional constructors.
Every entity class must be annotated `@Entity`.
@ -42,14 +42,28 @@ class Book {
}
----
Alternatively, when XML-based mappings are used, the `<entity>` element is used to declare an entity class:
Alternatively, the class may be identified as an entity type by providing an XML-based mapping for the class.
[TIP]
.Mapping entities using XML
====
When XML-based mappings are used, the `<entity>` element is used to declare an entity class:
[source,xml]
----
<package>org.hibernate.example</package>
<entity-mappings>
<package>org.hibernate.example</package>
<entity class="Book"> ... </entity>
<entity class="Book">
<attributes> ... </attributes>
</entity>
...
</entity-mappings>
----
We won't have much more to say about XML-based mappings in this Introduction, since it's not our preferred way to do things.
But since the `orm.xml` mapping file format defined by the JPA specification was modelled closely on the annotation-based mappings, it's usually easy to go back and forth between the two options.
====
Each entity class has a default _access type_, either:
@ -62,17 +76,30 @@ Concretely:
- if a field is annotated `@Id`, field access is used, or
- if a getter method is annotated `@Id`, property access is used.
Back when Hibernate was just a baby, property access was quite popular in the Hibernate community.
Today, however, field access is _much_ more common.
[NOTE]
.Explicit access type
====
The access type may be specified explicitly using the `@Access` annotation, but we strongly discourage this, since it's ugly and never necessary.
The default access type may be specified explicitly using the `@Access` annotation, but we strongly discourage this, since it's ugly and never necessary.
====
[IMPORTANT]
.Mapping annotations should be placed consistently
====
If the `@Id` annotation occurs on a field, the other mapping annotations should also be applied to field; or, if the `@Id` annotation occurs on a getter, the other mapping annotations should be applied to getters.
It is in principle possible to mix field and property access using explicit `@Access` annotations at the attribute level.
We don't recommend doing this.
====
Every entity must have an identifier attribute.
[identifier-attributes]
=== Identifier attributes
Every entity must have an identifier attribute.
The attribute is usually a field:
An identifier attribute is usually a field:
[source,java]
----
@ -105,21 +132,32 @@ class Book {
}
----
An identifier attribute must be annotated `@Id` or `@EmbeddedId`.
Identifier values may be:
- assigned by the application, that is, by your Java code, or
- generated and assigned by Hibernate.
[generated-identifiers]
=== Generated identifiers
An identifier is often system-generated, in which case it should be annotated `@GeneratedValue`:
[source,java]
----
@Entity
class Book {
Book() {}
@Id @GeneratedValue
Long id;
...
}
@Id @GeneratedValue
Long id;
----
[TIP]
.Using surrogate keys
====
System-generated identifiers, or _surrogate keys_ make it easier to evolve or refactor the relational data model.
If you have the freedom to define the relational schema, we recommend the use of surrogate keys.
On the other hand, if, as is more common, you're working with a pre-existing database schema, you might not have the option.
====
JPA defines the following strategies for generating ids, which are enumerated by `GenerationType`:
|===
@ -132,20 +170,178 @@ JPA defines the following strategies for generating ids, which are enumerated by
| `GenerationType.AUTO` | `Long` or `Integer` | Selects `SEQUENCE` `TABLE`, or `UUID` based on the identifier type and capabilities of the database.
|===
For example, the following id maps to a SQL `identity`, `auto_increment`, or `bigserial` column:
[source,java]
----
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=IDENTITY)
Long id;
----
The `@SequenceGenerator` and `@TableGenerator` annotations allow further control over `SEQUENCE` and `TABLE` generation respectively.
Consider this sequence generator:
[source,java]
----
@SequenceGenerator(name="bookSeq", sequenceName="seq_book",
initialValue = 5, allocationSize=10)
----
Values are generated using a database sequence defined as follows:
[source,sql]
----
create sequence seq_book start with 5 increment by 10
----
[IMPORTANT]
.Check the `initialValue` and `allocationSize`
====
If you let Hibernate export your database schema, the sequence definition will have the right `start with` and `increment` values.
But if you're working with a database schema managed outside of Hibernate, makes sure the `initialValue` and `allocationSize` members of `@SequenceGenerator` match the `start with` and `increment` specified in the DDL.
====
Any identifier attribute may now make use of the generator named `bookSeq`:
[source,java]
----
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=SEQUENCE, generator="bookSeq")
Long id;
----
Actually, it's extremely common to place the `@SequenceGenerator` annotation on the `@Id` attribute that makes use of it:
[source,java]
----
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=SEQUENCE, generator="bookSeq")
@SequenceGenerator(name="bookSeq", sequenceName="seq_book",
initialValue = 5, allocationSize=10)
Long id;
----
[NOTE]
.JPA id generators may be shared between entities
====
A `@SequenceGenerator` or `@TableGenerator` must have a name, and may be shared between multiple id attributes.
This fits somewhat uncomfortably with the common practice of annotating the `@Id` attribute which makes use of the generator!
====
As you can see, JPA provides quite adequate support for the most common strategies for system-generated ids.
However, the annotations themselves are a little more intrusive than they should be, and there's no well-defined way to extend this framework to support custom strategies for id generation.
Nor may `@GeneratedValue` be used on a property not annotated `@Id`.
Since custom id generation is a rather common requirement, Hibernate provides a very carefully-designed framework for user-defined ``Generator``s.
[TIP]
.Defining your own id generators
====
JPA doesn't define a standard way to extend the set of id generation strategies, but Hibernate does:
- the `Generator` hierarchy of interfaces in the package `org.hibernate.generator` lets you define new generators, and
- the `@IdGeneratorType` meta-annotation from the package `org.hibernate.annotations` lets you write an annotation which associates a `Generator` type with identifier attributes.
Furthermore, the `@ValueGenerationType` meta-annotation lets you write an annotation which associates a `Generator` type with a non-`@Id` attribute.
These APIs are new in Hibernate 6, and supersede the classic `IdentifierGenerator` interface from older versions of Hibernate.
You can find out more from the Javadoc for `@IdGeneratorType` and for `org.hibernate.generator`.
====
Not every id maps to a (system-generated) surrogate key.
Primary keys which are meaningful to the user of the system are called _natural keys_.
Of particular interest are natural keys which comprise more than one database column, and such natural keys are called _composite keys_.
[composite-identifiers]
=== Composite identifiers
If your database uses composite keys, you'll need more than one identifier attribute.
There are two ways to map composite keys in JPA:
- using an `@IdClass`, or
- using an `@EmbeddedId`.
Perhaps the most immediately-natural way to represent this in an entity class is with multiple fields annotated `@Id`, for example:
[source,java]
----
@Entity
@IdClass(BookId.class)
class Book {
Book() {}
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=IDENTITY)
Long id;
@Id
String isbn;
@Id
int printing;
...
}
----
The `@SequenceGenerator` and `@TableGenerator` annotations allow further control over id generation:
But this approach comes with a problem: what object can we use to identify a `Book` and pass to methods like `find()` which accept an identifier?
The solution is to write a separate class with fields that match the identifier attributes of the entity.
The `@IdClass` annotation of the `Book` entity identifies the id class to use for that entity:
[source,java]
----
class BookId {
String isbn;
int printing;
BookId() {}
BookId(String isbn, int printing) {
this.isbn = isbn;
this.printing = printing;
}
@Override
public boolean equals(Object other) {
if (other instanceof BookId) {
BookId bookId = (BookId) other;
return bookId.isbn.equals(isbn)
&& bookId.printing == printing;
}
else {
return false;
}
}
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return isbn.hashCode();
}
}
----
IMPORTANT: Every id class should override `equals()` and `hashCode()`.
This is not our preferred approach.
Instead, we recommend that the `BookId` class be declared as an `@Embeddable` type:
[source,java]
----
@Embeddable
class BookId {
String isbn;
int printing;
BookId() {}
BookId(String isbn, int printing) {
this.isbn = isbn;
this.printing = printing;
}
...
}
----
And now the entity class may reuse this definition using `@EmbeddedId`:
[source,java]
----
@ -153,11 +349,18 @@ The `@SequenceGenerator` and `@TableGenerator` annotations allow further control
class Book {
Book() {}
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=SEQUENCE, generator="bookSeq")
@SequenceGenerator(name="bookSeq", sequenceName="seq_book",
allocationSize=10)
Long id;
@EmbeddedId
BookId bookId;
...
}
----
This second approach eliminates some duplicated code.
Either way, we may now use `BookId` to obtain instances of `Book`:
[source,java]
----
Book book = session.find(Book.class, new BookId(isbn, printing));
----