minor language changes to HQL doc
This commit is contained in:
parent
32f635e752
commit
f9a0065976
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
[[basic-concepts]]
|
||||
== Basic concepts
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes Hibernate Query Language (HQL), which is, I suppose we could say, a dialect of the Java (now Jakarta) Persistence Query Language (JPQL).
|
||||
This document describes Hibernate Query Language (HQL), which is, I suppose we could say, a "dialect" of the Java (now Jakarta) Persistence Query Language (JPQL).
|
||||
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ In hindsight, it might have been better to define the whole language as case-sen
|
|||
[%unbreakable]
|
||||
[NOTE]
|
||||
====
|
||||
Incidentally, it's standard practice to use lowercase keywords in HQL and JPQL.
|
||||
Incidentally, it's standard practice to use lowercase keywords in HQL.
|
||||
|
||||
The use of uppercase keywords indicates an endearing but unhealthy attachment to the culture of the 1970's.
|
||||
====
|
||||
|
@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ This rule is the source of the famous (and controversial) _ternary logic_ of SQL
|
|||
A logical expression like `firstName='Gavin' and team='Hibernate'` isn't restricted to the values `true` and `false`.
|
||||
It may also be `null`.
|
||||
|
||||
This can in principle lead to some quite unintuitive results: we can't use the law of the excluded middle to reason about logical expressions in SQL!
|
||||
But in practice, we've once never run into a case where this caused us problems.
|
||||
This can, in principle, lead to some quite unintuitive results: we can't use the law of the excluded middle to reason about logical expressions in SQL!
|
||||
But in practice, we've never once run into a case where this caused us problems.
|
||||
|
||||
As you probably know, when a logical predicate occurs as a <<where-clause,restriction>>, rows for which the predicate evaluates to `null` are _excluded_ from the result set.
|
||||
That is, in this context at least, a logical null is interpreted as "effectively false".
|
||||
|
@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ For example:
|
|||
delete Author author where is empty author.books
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
As in SQL, the presence or absence of the `from` keyword has absolutely no effect on the semantics of the `update` statement.
|
||||
As in SQL, the presence or absence of the `from` keyword has absolutely no effect on the semantics of the `delete` statement.
|
||||
|
||||
Just like update statements, delete statements are polymorphic, and affect mapped subclasses of the given entity class.
|
||||
Therefore, a single HQL `delete` statement might result in multiple SQL delete statements executed against the database.
|
||||
|
@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ But at least we don't have to write them explicitly.
|
|||
[[select-new]]
|
||||
==== Instantiation
|
||||
|
||||
In JPA, and in older versions of Hibernate, this functionality required more ceremony.
|
||||
In JPQL, and in older versions of Hibernate, this functionality required more ceremony.
|
||||
|
||||
[cols="25,~,~,^15"]
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue