HHH-11891 - Clarify documentation about Hibernate support for basic array types
Apply Steve suggestions
This commit is contained in:
parent
f0ccd7126a
commit
fa81aafb28
|
@ -744,11 +744,14 @@ include::{extrasdir}/collections-map-bidirectional-example.sql[]
|
|||
[[collections-array]]
|
||||
==== Arrays
|
||||
|
||||
When it comes to arrays, there is quite a difference between Java arrays and relational database array types (e.g. VARRAY, ARRAY).
|
||||
When discussing arrays, it is important to understand the distinction between SQL array types and Java arrays that are mapped as part of the application's domain model.
|
||||
|
||||
First, not all database systems implement the SQL-99 ARRAY type, and, for this reason, Hibernate doesn't support native database array types.
|
||||
Not all databases implement the SQL-99 ARRAY type and, for this reason,
|
||||
Hibernate doesn't support native database array types.
|
||||
|
||||
Second, Java arrays could be relevant only for basic types since storing multiple embeddables or entities should always be done using the Java Collection API.
|
||||
Hibernate does support the mapping of arrays in the Java domain model - conceptually the same as mapping a List.
|
||||
However, it is important to realize that it is impossible for Hibernate to offer lazy-loading for arrays of entities and, for this reason,
|
||||
it is strongly recommended to map a "collection" of entities using a List rather than an array.
|
||||
|
||||
[[collections-array-binary]]
|
||||
==== Arrays as binary
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue